Synopsis
MR-based quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIBs) can
provide anatomic and functional measures critical to the successful delivery of
precision medicine by informing treatment selection, providing early non-invasive
assessment of treatment response, and providing post-treatment surveillance. In spite of these opportunities, however,
there are significant barriers to successful implementation of such measures
across imaging systems, centers, and time.
Several scientific organizations and agencies are currently seeking to
address barriers to successful QIB implementation. This presentation will provide examples of
MR-based QIBs, describe key challenges to their disseminated implementation,
and provide examples of efforts of agencies and organizations to address those
challenges.Objectives:
1) Understand the opportunities for MR quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIBs) in
research and clinical applications.
2) Understand key challenges of MR QIBs and
current barriers to implementation.
3) Understand current strategies to address the
challenges of MR QIBs based on efforts of national and international agencies
and organizations, including the ISMRM, RSNA, NIST, and NCI.
Abstract:
Over the past decade, there has been an increasing
focus on quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIBs), which have been defined as “objective
characteristics derived from in vivo images as indicators of normal
biological processes, pathogenic processes, or response to a therapeutic
intervention” [1]. There are many
examples of successful QIB implementation and use for research and clinical
care in single centers of excellence. Successful
implementation of QIBs across systems, centers, and time, however, requires the
development and standardization of data acquisition, data analysis, and data
display techniques, as well as appropriate reporting structures. As such, successful implementation of QIBs
relies on expertise from the fields of medical physics, radiology, statistics,
and informatics as well as collaboration from vendors of imaging acquisition, data
analysis, and reporting systems. When
successfully implemented, QIBs provide image-derived metrics with known bias
and variance that can be validated with anatomically and physiologically
relevant measures, including treatment response, and the heterogeneity of that
response, and outcome. Such non-invasive
quantitative measures can then be used confidently and effectively in translational
research as well as patient care.
In addition to modality-specific QIB efforts of modality-specific
scientific organizations, other national and international agencies and organizations,
including the NCI, RSNA, FDA, and NIST, appreciating the tremendous potential
of QIBs but also understanding the associated challenges, have become
increasingly involved. This presentation
will focus on 1) briefly discussing selected MR-based QIBs and illustrating why
they are important in research and clinical applications, even though
challenging to implement across systems, centers, and time, and 2) providing examples
of efforts of national and international organizations, including the ISMRM, RSNA,
NCI, and NIST, to address barriers to successful implementation and validation
of MR-based QIBs.
Acknowledgements
NIBIB Contracts HHSN268201000050C, HHSN268201300071C, and HHSN268201500021CReferences
1. Sullivan,
Obuchowski, Kessler, et al., Metrology Standards for Quantitative
Imaging Biomarkers, Radiology 277(3):813-825, 2015