Synopsis
Conventional
methods of measuring renal function including estimated GFR are insensitive to
early renal dysfunction and cannot assess single kidney function/dysfunction.
Advance MR imaging techniques including diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) are
being investigated to study renal microstructure and function in health and
disease. Various flavors of diffusion weighted imaging including intra-voxel
incoherent motion (IVIM) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) have shown
considerable promise in evaluation of kidney structure and function. Abstract
Quantitative
Biomarkers in Renal MRI:
Adding
Physiologic Information to the Morphologic Assessment
Diffusion
Weighted Imaging
Anatomic
abnormality such as change in renal size or atrophy is a late marker of
irreversible renal dysfunction. Therefore, it is imperative to utilize other
measures of renal function to evaluate patients with known or suspected renal
disease. Currently blood test based measure of serum creatinine is used to
compute glomerular filtration rate (GFR). This is considered the standard of
care in the evaluation of kidney function but suffers from number of major
limitations such as inability to provide function of each kidney separately,
has lower sensitivity for early renal damage, cannot discriminate between
reversible and irreversible renal damage, and is inaccurate in elderly, thin
and obese subjects.
Over the last 2 decades, magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI), conventionally used for tissue anatomic imaging, is
also being explored for assessing microstructure and function of various organs
including kidneys. MRI techniques, such as, diffusion-weighted MRI, dynamic
contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI, and blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) MRI,
enables evaluation of various aspects of renal structure and function. Diffusion
Weighted Imaging (DWI) has shown considerable promise and various flavors of
DWI being investigated to study renal structure and function will be discussed
(1, 2).
Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI)
DWI is a technique that quantifies
the motion of water molecules in tissues. It derives image contrast based on
differences in the mobility of protons, which are primarily associated with
water. DWI is most simply performed with 2 b values, such as 0 or 50 sec/mm2
and 500 to 1000 sec/mm2; with two b values, the exponential decay of signals is
approximated using a monoexponential fit to arrive at a decay constant,
referred to as the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) (3-5). Tissues that are highly cellular or highly complex tend to restrict the
motion of water and have lower ADC compared to the tissues that are less
complex or less cellular.
Intra-Voxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM)
ADC provides in vivo quantification
of the combined effects of capillary perfusion and true diffusion. Le Bihan et al., in pioneering
work on intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) modeling of diffusion-weighted
imaging, suggested that movement of blood in microvasculature could be modeled
as a pseudo-diffusion process which is measurable at low b values (< 200
sec/mm2) (6-7). IVIM or perfusion effects can be resolved from true tissue
diffusion by using sufficient b-value sampling and a biexponential curve fit
analysis.
This model assumes two compartments:
(1) a vascular compartment, occupying a perfusion fraction fp of the tissue
volume in each voxel and showing a pseudodiffusion coefficient Dp, and (2) a
tissue compartment, occupying the remaining volume fraction (1-fp) and showing
a tissue diffusivity Dt. Both
compartments are assumed to demonstrate exponential signal decay with diffusion
weighting factor b (8-10).
Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI)
ADC is a scalar property, i.e. it
has magnitude but no directionality. However, diffusion of water molecule in a
kidney, especially in the renal medulla, is a three dimensional process with
both magnitude and direction. This
directionality of diffusion also known as anisotropy can be measured by
applying diffusion gradients in multiple (at least 6) directions. Anisotropy can
provide information about the microstructure and this degree of anisotropy can
be expressed by the term fractional anisotropy (FA). FA values range from 0 to
1, with 0 being isotropic diffusion without directionality and 1 being
completely anisotropic diffusion in only one direction (1, 9, 11-13). Combined
DTI and IVIM analysis although challenging is possible to assess directionality
in the slow and fast component of the diffusion signal (14).
These
techniques are being utilized to study various renal diseases such as kidney
tumor, renal artery stenosis, diabetic nephropathy, chronic renal failure, and
renal transplant dysfunction. Application of these techniques will be briefly
discussed.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Chandarana H,
Lee VS. Renal functional
MRI: Are we ready for clinical application? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009
Jun;192(6):1550-7
2. Zhang JL,
Rusinek H, Chandarana H, Lee VS. Functional MRI of the kidneys. J Magn Reson
Imaging. 2013 Feb;37(2):282-93.
3. Taouli B,
Thakur RK, Mannelli L, Babb JS, Kim S, Hecht EM, Lee VS, Israel GM. Renal
lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted imaging versus
contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
Radiology.
2009 May;251(2):398-407
4. Thoeny HC, De
Keyzer F. Diffusion-weighted
MR imaging of native and transplanted kidneys. Radiology. 2011
Apr;259(1):25-38.
5. Thoeny HC, De
Keyzer F, Oyen RH, Peeters RR. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of kidneys in
healthy volunteers and patients with parenchymal diseases: initial experience.
Radiology. 2005 Jun;235(3):911-7.
6. Le Bihan D,
Breton E, Lallemand D, et al. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in
intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology 1988;168:497-505.
7. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, et
al. MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and
perfusion in neurologic disorders. Radiology 1986;161:401-407.
8. Chandarana H,
Lee VS, Hecht E, Taouli B, Sigmund EE.
Comparison
of biexponential and monoexponential model of diffusion weighted imaging in
evaluation of renal lesions: preliminary experience. Invest Radiol. 2011
May;46(5):285-91.
9. Sigmund EE,
Vivier PH, Sui D, Lamparello NA, Tantillo K, Mikheev A, Rusinek H, Babb JS,
Storey P, Lee VS, Chandarana H.
Intravoxel
incoherent motion and diffusion-tensor imaging in renal tissue under hydration
and furosemide flow challenges.
Radiology.
2012 Jun;263(3):758-69.
10. Thoeny HC,
Binser T, Roth B, Kessler TM, Vermathen P. Noninvasive assessment of acute
ureteral obstruction with diffusion-weighted MR imaging: a prospective study.
Radiology. 2009 Sep;252(3):721-8.
11. Heusch P,
Wittsack HJ, Kröpil P, et al. Impact of blood flow on diffusion coefficients of
the human kidney: a time-resolved ECG-triggered diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI)
study at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Jan;37(1):233-6.
12.
Notohamiprodjo M, Dietrich O, Horger W, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)
of the kidney at 3 tesla-feasibility, protocol evaluation and comparison to 1.5
Tesla. Invest Radiol. 2010 May;45(5):245-54.
13.
Notohamiprodjo M, Glaser C, Herrmann KA, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of the
kidney with parallel imaging: initial clinical experience. Invest Radiol. 2008
Oct;43(10):677-85.
14.
Notohamiprodjo M, Chandarana H, Mikheev A, et al. Combined intravoxel
incoherent motion and diffusion tensor imaging of renal diffusion and flow
anisotropy. Magn Reson Med. 2015 Apr;73(4):1526-32.