Ferumoxytol: Should We Be Using It in Clinical Practice?
Mustafa Bashir1

1Duke University Medical Center

Synopsis

Ferumoxytol has seen increasing use as a contrast agent in both clinical and research MRI. This talk will describe some of the potential uses and risks associated with the agent.

Ferumoxytol - what is it?

Ferumoxytol is an ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) agent initially approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an iron replacement therapy for patients with anemia due to chronic renal failure. It is composed of iron oxide particles surrounded by a carbohydrate coat. Recently, ferumoxytol has been investigated extensively as an intravenous contrast agent in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). It has been postulated as an alternative to gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) in patients in whom GBCA administration is contraindicated due to renal dysfunction, dialysis dependence, and other risk factors for nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF).

What can it be used for?

Since it causes regional T1 and T2 * shortening in vivo, conventional pulse sequences can be used following ferumoxytol administration to demonstrate signal enhancement or loss. Ferumoxytol can be administered as either a rapid bolus or slow infusion, though the FDA advises against bolus administration. It has a long intravascular half-life on the order of 14-15 hours, making it a potentially useful agent for vascular and perfusion-weighted MRI.

A variety of intravascular applications of ferumoxytol have been described, including aortoiliac imaging, assessment for endoleaks after stent-graft repair, DVT imaging, and renal transplant vascular imaging. In addition, it may have utility as an intravascular contrast agent in assessing vascular invasion by tumors such as renal cell carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma, in patients who cannot receive GBCAs.

Ferumoxytol is ultimately taken up by macrophages and broken down, with trafficking of the iron moieties into the reticuloendothelial system in the liver, spleen, and lymph nodes. This uptake mechanism is being explored as a novel imaging technique for vascular lesions, tumors, and lymph nodes. In this setting, ferumoxytol functions as an in vivo label for macrophages and can be used to track macrophage localization. Small studies have suggested that cerebral aneurysms and carotid plaques at elevated risk for rupture can be differentiated from stable lesions based on localization of ferumoxytol-labeled macrophages. Imaging for lymph node metastases has also been described, based on absence of macrophage/ferumoxytol accumulation in nodes replaced by metastasis. Brain tumor imaging using the same mechanism has also been described.

What are the risks?

In comparison to other USPIOs, ferumoxytol is less limited by allergic and idiosyncratic reactions. However, serious reactions to ferumoxytol administration have been described, including hypotension and anaphylaxis. Reaction rates appear to be higher than those associated with gadolinium-based contrast agents, thus risks and benefits must be weighted carefully prior to choosing to administer ferumoxytol. Like any medication, ferumoxytol must be administered in a setting where appropriate support and timely response to reactions is available.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

1. Auerbach M, Strauss W, Auerbach S, Rineer S, Bahrain H. Safety and efficacy of total dose infusion of 1,020 mg of ferumoxytol administered over 15 min. Am. J. Hematol. 2013;88:944–947.

2. Provenzano R, Schiller B, Rao M, Coyne D, Brenner L, Pereira BJG. Ferumoxytol as an intravenous iron replacement therapy in hemodialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009;4:386–393.

3. Bircher AJ, Auerbach M. Hypersensitivity from intravenous iron products. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2014;34:707–723, x–xi.

4. Prince MR, Zhang H, Zou Z, Staron RB, Brill PW. Incidence of immediate gadolinium contrast media reactions. Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:W138–W143.

5. Prince MR, Zhang HL, Chabra SG, Jacobs P, Wang Y. A pilot investigation of new superparamagnetic iron oxide (ferumoxytol) as a contrast agent for cardiovascular MRI. J Xray Sci Technol 2003;11:231–240.

6. Li W, Tutton S, Vu AT, Pierchala L, Li BSY, Lewis JM, Prasad PV, Edelman RR. First-pass contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in humans using ferumoxytol, a novel ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO)-based blood pool agent. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;21:46–52.

7. Hamilton BE, Nesbit GM, Dosa E, Gahramanov S, Rooney B, Nesbit EG, Raines J, Neuwelt EA. Comparative analysis of ferumoxytol and gadoteridol enhancement using T1- and T2-weighted MRI in neuroimaging. Am J Roentgenol 2011;197:981–988.

8. Bremerich J, Bilecen D, Reimer P. MR angiography with blood pool contrast agents. Eur Radiol 2007;17:3017–3024.

9. Ersoy H, Jacobs P, Kent CK, Prince MR. Blood pool MR angiography of aortic stent-graft endoleak. Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:1181–1186.

10. Bashir MR, Bhatti L, Marin D, Nelson RC. Emerging applications for ferumoxytol as a contrast agent in MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;41(4):884–898.

11. Bashir MR, Jaffe TA, Brennan TV, Patel UD, Ellis MJ. Renal transplant imaging using magnetic resonance angiography with a non-nephrotoxic contrast agent. Transplantation 2013;96:91–96.

12. Li W, Salanitri J, Tutton S, Dunkle EE, Schneider JR, Caprini JA, Pierchala LN, Jacobs PM, Edelman RR. Lower extremity deep venous thrombosis: evaluation with ferumoxytol-enhanced MR imaging and dual-contrast mechanism—preliminary experience. Radiology 2007;242:873–881.

13. Bashir MR, Mody R, Neville A, Javan R, Seaman D, Kim CY, Gupta RT, Jaffe TA. Retrospective assessment of the utility of an iron-based agent for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance venography in patients with end stage renal diseases. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;40:113–118.

14. Nayak AB, Luhar A, Hanudel M, Gales B, Hall TR, Finn JP, Salusky IB, Zaritsky J. High resolution, whole-body vascular imaging with ferumoxytol as an alternative to gadolinium agents in a pediatric chronic kidney disease cohort. Pediatr Nephrol. 2015;30:515–521.

15. Ruangwattanapaisarn N, Hsiao A, Vasanawala SS. Ferumoxytol as an off-label contrast agent in body 3T MR angiography: a pilot study in children. Pediatr Radiol 2015;45:831–839.

16. Gahramanov S, Muldoon LL, Varallyay CG, Li X, Kraemer DF, Fu R, Hamilton BE, Rooney WD, Neuwelt EA. Pseudoprogression of glioblastoma after chemo- and radiation therapy: diagnosis by using dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging with ferumoxytol versus gadoteridol and correlation with survival. Radiology 2013;266:842–852.

17. Sankineni S, Smedley J, Bernardo M, et al. Ferumoxytol as an intra-prostatic MR contrast agent for lymph node mapping of the prostate: a feasibility study in non-human primates. Acta Radiol 2015. doi:10.1177/0284185115586023.

18. Vasanawala SS, Nguyen KL, Hope MD, Bridges MD, Hope TA, Bashir MR. Safety and technique of ferumoxytol administration for MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2016 Feb 18. Doi:10.1002/mrm.26151.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)