Marko Hoehne1, Andreas Graessl2, Antje Els2, Thomas Herold3, and Thoralf Niendorf4
1HELIOS Klinikum Berlin Buch, Radiology, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine (MDC) Berlin,Ultrahigh Field Facility (B.U.F.F.), Berlin, Germany, 2Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine (MDC), Ultrahigh Field Facility (B.U.F.F.), Berlin, Germany, 3HELIOS Klinikum Berlin Buch, Radiology, Berlin, Germany, 4Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine (MDC), Experimental and Clinical Research Center (ECRC), Charite Campus Berlin Buch, Humboldt University Berlin, Ultrahigh Field Facility (B.U.F.F.), Berlin, Germany
Synopsis
Technology advances in ultra-high field systems improve significantly
diagnose of different musculoskeletal structures. A
challenge of this work examines relative RF power
deposition for shoulder MRI with dual echo steady state imaging at 3.0T and
7.0T.
Volunteers (n=10, mean
age 36.5 ± 8.51 years) were
investigated at 3.0 T and 7.0 T. The flip angle was varied
for each field strength.
A comparison of flip angle
between 3.0T and 7.0T showed a SAR gain of approximately 2.6 for the
local RF coil setup used at 7.0 T versus the body coil configuration employed
at 3.0 T. It is important to considering a
right choice of sequences and these parameters.Purpose
This work is of interest for clinical scientist, applied scientist and
experts in musculoskeletal MR at 3.0T and 7.0T.
MRI of subtle anatomical structures of the shoulder joints constitutes a
challenge for diagnostic imaging due to spatial resolution constraints at 1.5 T
and 3.0 T. Progress in ultrahigh field MR holds the promise to address this
challenge with the ultimate goal to put the intrinsic sensitivity advantage at 7T
into clinical use. Yet, some of the inherent advantages of UHF-MR are offset by
practical
obstacles including RF power deposition constraints. Recognizing this challenge this work
examines relative RF power deposition for shoulder MRI with dual echo steady
state imaging at 3.0T and 7.0T.
Methods
Volunteers (n=10,
mean age 36.5 ± 8.51 years) were
investigated at 3.0 T and 7.0 T using whole body MR scanners (3.0T,
MagnetomVerio, 7.0T, Magnetom (Siemens, Erlangen Germany). At 3.0 T (1H
123Hz) a body coil was used for excitation while a 4 channel shoulder coil
(Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) was used for reception. At 7.0 T (1H 297Hz) a 12 channel
transceiver RF coil array dedicated for shoulder imaging was employed. The
array comprises three modestly shaped sections to conform to an averaged
shoulder. Each section contains 4 loop elements. The elements are organized in
a 2 x 2 matrix. Electromagnetic (EM) field and SAR simulations were performed
using Studio Suite 2012 (CST, Darmstadt, Germany) together with the voxel model
Duke from the Virtual Family (ITIS Foundation, Zurich, Switzerland).
A circular polarized
mode with phases according to the angular position of the modules was employed.
All elements were connected to multipurpose transmit/receive switch boxes with
integrated low-noise preamplifiers. No specific tuning and matching or subject
transmission field shaping was applied. For all volunteers dual echo steady
state (DESS) was performed in normal operating mode [1] using the same parameters (TR=17.52ms.
TE=5.41ms, slice thickness= 2.0 mm, acquisition time were TA=6:40min, FOV=200 x
200 mm2, matrix size=320 x 320, receiver bandwidth=155Hz/pixel, no
fat saturation, slices per slab=40) at 3.0T and 7.0T. Local SAR limits were applied
for the 12 channel transceiver array applied at 7.0 T. Global SAR limits were
applied for the body coil transmission at 3.0 T. The flip angle was varied for
each field strength ranging from 0.09 rad (5 degree) to the maximal flip angle
supported by the SAR limits. Relative SAR was obtained from the SAR monitoring
routine provided with the scanners operating software. Statistical evaluation
was conducted with a paired Mann-Whitney-U-test. Using statistical package for the social
sciences, (SPSS, version 23, Chicago, Illinois) and Microsoft excel.
Results
All volunteers were scanned
at 3.0T and 7.0T using the same parameters for 3D DESS. At 3.0T a flip angle
range of 0.09 rad to 1.571 rad (90 degree) was achieved before hitting the SAR
limit. At 7.0T the maximum flip angle range
was limited to 0.785 rad (45 degree) due to the RF power deposition limits. The
flip angle comparison between 3.0T and 7.0T showed a SAR gain of approximately 2.6
for the local RF coil setup used at 7.0 T versus the body coil configuration
employed at 3.0 T.
Discussion and Conclusions
Transferring
musculoskeletal ultrahigh field MR from clinical research into clinical routine
is at an early stage of the development process. Notwithstanding this challenge
7.0T MRI holds the potential to advance the capabilities of musculoskeletal
imaging. To meet this goal, the suboptimal copy and paste approach to protocol
migration from 3.0T to 7.0T needs to be supplanted application-targeted
redesign of imaging protocols including RF power deposition considerations.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] IEC 60601-2-33 medical electrical equipment, Part 2-33, Particular
requirements for safety of magnetic resonance equipment for medical diagnosis, 2010