Xuejiao Che1, Ryan Brown 1,2, Leeor Alon1,2, Ravinder R Regatte1, and Prodromos Parasoglou1
1Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States, 2NYU WIRELESS, Polytechnic Institute of New York University, Brooklyn, NY, United States
Synopsis
In this work, we
designed and constructed an inexpensive MR compatible ergometer that can be used
for studying lower leg muscle metabolism. This ergometer allows subjects to
perform a plantar flexion exercise protocol while 31P-MR data are
acquired. The
device is easy to use, and it can be positioned inside the bore of the magnet
in less than 10 min. The mechanical power exerted by the subject can be
estimated from force and angle displacement signals that are continuously monitored,
while the exersice intensity can be varied by changing the number and/or the
material of the resistive elastic cords.PURPOSE
To design and construct
a low-cost MR compatible ergometer that enables human subjects to perform a
plantar flexion exercise protocol while inside a whole–body MR scanner.
BACKGROUND
Phosphorus (
31P) Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
(MRS) is a well-established method for measuring the rate of phosphocreatine
(PCr) resynthesis after exercise, which is an index of mitochondrial oxidative
metabolism in the muscle,
1-3
and has been used extensively to differentiate between normal and pathological states.
4-7
Acquisition of
31P-MR data during a rest-exercise-recovery protocol
requires an ergometer that records the force exerted during exercise and is compatible
with the high magnetic field of modern MR scanners. In this work, we present an
in-house developed MR compatible ergometer, which enables human subjects to
perform a plantar flexion exercise protocol while
31P-MR data are
acquired.
METHODS
The mechanical body of the ergometer, including the foot
pedal and mounting board (Fig.1) was made entirely of custom machined plastic
to enable use in the MR environment. Forces applied to the pedal were
continuously monitored with non-magnetic force transducer and angle sensors (Tekscan,
MA). The analog force and angle signals were digitized outside the magnet on an
Arduino Uno Rev 3 board and inputted to Matlab for real-time processing and
display. The angle sensor (Fig.1b,d) triggered a LED on top of the pedal that
provided real-time feedback to the subject, indicating when the predetermined
flexion angle threshold had been reached (Fig.1c). Rubber bands were used to generate
the defined forces that counteract the plantar flexion, ranging from 0 to approximately
250 N. The total cost of the plastic materials and electronics to construct the
ergometer was under 500 USD.
We tested the ergometer on a 7 T whole-body magnet (Siemens
Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) with a dual tuned (
31P/
1H)
quadrature transmit-receive kneel coil (Rapid MRI Ohio). A 32 year old male
subject performed a 2.5-min plantar exercise at 0.33 Hz to an acoustic cue. The
ergometer was used to measure plantar force exerted during the experiment,
while PCr signal in the gastrocnemius was acquired with a spectrally selective
three-dimensional turbo spin echo (TSE) sequence with a temporal resolution of 6-s.
12
RESULTS
A PCr image in a
cross-section of the lower leg is shown in Figure 2a. During the plantar
flexion, PCr signal decreases and recovers after the plantar flexion is
stopped. The signal in a segmentation of the gastrocnemius is shown (Fig.2b).
The forces generated during the plantar flexion exercise are continuously
monitored as shown in Figure 2c.
DISCUSSION
In
this work, we designed and constructed a robust low-cost ergometer that can be
used to quantify force generated inside the magnet while acquiring
31P-MR
data. The main advantage of this pedal is that it is easy to construct at a
very low cost (under 500 USD) and can be easiliy connected and placed on the
magnet bed. Despite its low cost, it allows continuous measurement of the
effort exerted by the exercising subject. That is mainly because of the use of
inexpensive, yet efficient componensts, such as the Arduino microcontroller. One
of the limitations of this ergometer is that resistance forces cannot be
changed during the experiment. Such changes can be more easily performed using
pneumatic resistances.
11 Also, visual feedback is only given by an LED
light when subjects reach the desired displacement angle. More sophisticared
approaches have incorporated MR compatible mounted displays, which would
increase the total cost significantly.
13CONCLUSION
We constructed a low
cost MR compatible ergometer. This ergometer allows subjects to perform a
plantar flexion exercise protocol while
31P-MR data are acquired. It
is easy to build and can be used on whole-body MR scanners.
Acknowledgements
The
authors thank Jerzy Walczyk and Cornel
Stefanescu for their help with the construction of the ergometer. This study was supported by NIH grants RO1 DK106292,
R01 AR056260, and R01 AR060238, and was performed under the rubric of the
Center of Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), a NIBIB Biomedical
Technology Resource Center (NIH P41 EB017183).References
1.Arnold DL, et al. Magn Reson Med 1984; 1(3):307-315.
2.Kemp G, et al. J Neurol Sci 1993;
116(2):201-206.
3.Prompers JJ, et al. NMR Biomed 2006;
19(7):927-953.
4.Crowther GJ, et al. Am J Physiol Endocrinol
Metab 2003; 284(4):E655-E662.
5.Isbell DC, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;
47(11):2289-2295.
6.Keller U, et al. Eur J Clin Invest 1985;
15(6):382-388.
7.Khushu S, et al. Magn Reson Imaging 2010;
28(5):683-689.
8.Francescato MP, Cettolo V Magn Reson Med
2001; 46(5):1000-1005.
9.Bangsbo J, et al. J Appl Physiol 1993;
74(4):2034-2039.
10.Ghomi RH, et al. Skeletal Radiol 2011; 40(10):1349-1354.
11.Meyerspeer M, et al. Magn Reson Mater Phys
Biol Med 2005; 18(5):257-262.
12.Parasoglou P, et al. NMR Biomed 2013;
26(3):348-356.
13.Tschiesche K, et al. Med Eng Phys 2014;
36(7):933-937.