Radka Tušková1,2,3, Ladislav Valkovič1,3,4,5, Martin Gajdošík1,3, Thomas Heckmann6, Norbert Bachl6, Harald Tschan6, Siegfried Trattnig1,3, and Martin Krššák1,3,7
1High-Field MR Center, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 2Faculty of Chemical and Food Technology, Department of NMR Spectroscopy and Mass Spectrometry, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia, 3Christian Doppler Laboratory for Clinical Molecular MR Imaging, Vienna, Austria, 4John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 5Department of Imaging Methods, Institute of Measurements Science, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia, 6Center of Sport Science and University Sport, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 7Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Synopsis
Carnitine plays an important role in fat metabolism. A long-echo
time (TE of 350ms) proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy protocol was
implemented for detection of skeletal muscle acetylcarnitine at rest on a
clinical 7T scanner in the calf (soleus) and thigh (vastus lateralis) muscle. T2
relaxation times of the 2.13 ppm signal of acetlylcarnitine at 7T were assessed
as 137.8±47.7ms. Concentrations of acetylcarnitine in vastus lateralis muscle
in four healthy volunteers were found to be 1.69±0.21mmol/kg wet weight,
whereas lower concentrations (i.e., 0.54±0.19mmol/kg) were found in soleus
muscle. Introduction
Carnitine plays an important role in fat metabolism, as it serves as
a shuttle for acetyl groups from cytosol to mitochondrial matrix [1]. Therefore, it is crucial in glucose metabolism and pathogenesis of
insulin resistance and of type 2 diabetes mellitus [2]. The main reservoir of carnitine is skeletal muscle. Acetylcarnitine
(AC) could be observed at 2.13 and 3.17ppm chemical shifts in proton (1H)
MR spectra. The fact, that in in vivo
the AC line at 2.13ppm overlaps with lipid resonances and the line at 3.17ppm with
trimethyl ammonium (TMA) peak, hinders a straight-forward detection and
quantification of AC in skeletal muscle. Typically, the altered carnitine
mechanism and increased concentration of AC after exercise enables the
detection of AC [3] in difference spectra. Recently,the differences
in T2-relaxation times of AC and lipids have been employed for
detection of the 2.13ppm line of AC in long TE 1H MR spectroscopy
(MRS) of quadriceps muscle at rest at 3T [4].
In this work we aimed to detect the AC resonance at 2.13ppm in calf
(soleus) muscle and thigh muscle (vastus lateralis) in m. quadriceps femoris at
rest, using long TE MRS at 7T; to determine itsT2– relaxation times; and to compare
the AC concentrations in both muscle groups.
Methods
All measurements were
performed on a 7T whole body Magnetom MR system (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen,
Germany). A 28 channel knee coil (QED, Mayfield Village, OH, USA) was used to
acquire spectra from the calf and quadriceps muscles of the left leg. Four
healthy, active, male volunteers (age 30.2±4.0 years, BMI 23.2±0.7 kg/m2)
were recruited for this study. Spatial
selection was achieved using a STEAM localization sequence (TR/TE=2000/350ms,
spectral bandwidth=3kHz, number of averages=128, delta frequency=2.5ppm,
preparation scans=4). The voxel of interest (40x35x15mm3) was placed
in the soleus (SOL) or vastus lateralis (VL) muscles. Due to the long TE
applied, water suppression was redundant. For the assessment of T2-relaxation
time of AC peak at 2.13ppm at 7T a series of seven spectra with variable TE’s
(100-450ms) were acquired in both muscles in all volunteers. Remaining sequence
parameters were identical. All spectra were fitted in AMARES in the jMRUI
software [5]. T2-relaxation time was calculated in MATLAB by fitting
the data with the monoexponential function MTE=M0.e(-TE/T2).
Using the residual water peak as an internal reference the absolute concentration of AC (in
mmol/kg) was calculated according to the formula for molar concentration in wet
weight:
CAC=(SAC/Sw)*(CFw/CFAC)*cw*nw*w%
where
S are signals of metabolites (w-water, AC-acetylcarnitine), CF are correction
factors for T2 relaxation, cw=55 mol/L is the molar concentration of
the water,nw=2 is the number of protons in a water molecule and w% is the
approximate water content of skeletal muscle tissue, i.e. 0.7 l/kg wet weight
of the tissue.
Results
Using long TE, we were able to detect AC resonance line at 2.13ppm at
rest in both muscles (Fig. 1) in all four volunteers. The T2 of AC
in VL muscle was found to be 137.8±47.7ms (Tab. 1) and the comparison of
visibility of the AC signal at different TE’s is shown in Fig. 2. Unfortunately
we were not able to resolve the AC peak in SOL muscle spectra with short TE. However,
the T2 of TMA, lipids and water peak in SOL are almost equal as in
VL muscle, so we can assume similar T2 of AC in SOL muscle as well. Concentrations
of AC from SOL and VL muscles are shown in Tab. 2.
Discussion
Our results demonstrate effective detection of AC using
long TE at rest at 7T in both muscle groups. The assessed concentration of AC
from VL in healthy volunteers was found to be 1.69±0.21mmol/kg
wet weight, which is in good agreement with the results of Lindeboom et al. who
reported 1.58±0.30 mmol/kg in endurance-trained subjects [4]. The AC concentration in SOL at rest was found to be lower i.e., 0.54±0.19mmol/kg. Observed differences in skeletal muscle AC among
different volunteers could be caused due to different training status, as was
shown in study by Lindeboom et al. [4].
Conclusion
The long-TE 1H MRS measurement at 7T represents successful
method for the detection and quantitation of AC at rest. This method can be
applied to clarify the role of AC levels in relation to impaired mitochondrial
oxidation of fatty acids and insulin resistance in different skeletal muscle
groups.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the ÖNB Jubiläumsfond (grant #15455 to L.V., grant #16133 to W.B. and grant #15363 to M.K.), by Christian Doppler Society – Clinical Molecular MR Imaging (MOLIMA) and as well by grants from the Agency of the Slovak Academy of Science, VEGA 2/0013/14.References
[1] H. Karlic
and A. Lohninger, Nutrition, 709–715, 2004.
[2] G. Mingrone,
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 99–107, 2004.
[3] J. Ren, et al. Magn. Reson.
Med., 7–17, 2013.
[4] L.
Lindeboom, et al. J. Clin. Invest., 4915–25, 2014.
[5] L. Vanhamme,
et al. J. Magn. Reson., 35–43, 1997.