Alfredo Liubomir Lopez Kolkovsky1,2, Benjamin Marty1,2, Eric Giacomini1, and Pierre G Carlier1,2
1NMR Laboratory, Institut of Myology, Paris, France, 2NMR Laboratory, CEA/DSV/I2BM/MIRCen, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
Synopsis
NMR allows to investigate multiple aspects of physiological
parameters like regional perfusion, blood and tissue oxygenation, intracellular
pH or high-energy phosphate metabolism. In the past, interleaved
multiparametric multinuclear dynamic NMR imaging and spectroscopy of skeletal
muscle was developed on prototype scanners. Here we evaluated an interleaved
pulse sequence combining the NMR acquisition of a 1H image and 31P
spectrum on a clinical system without any hardware modifications from the
customer. Having the possibility to run interleaved
multinuclear sequences on unmodified clinical systems will greatly facilitate
simultaneous measurements
of tissue perfusion, oxygen content and mitochondrial ATP production in
clinical research studies.Purpose
NMR allows to investigate multiple aspects of physiological
parameters in vivo such as regional
perfusion, blood and tissue oxygenation, intracellular pH or high-energy
phosphate metabolism. Classically, NMR acquisition schemes rarely explore more
than a few biological parameters which are often measured in separate
experimental sessions, adding experimental variability
1 on biological processes
which are already multifactorial
2,3. The benefit of interleaved multinuclear
dynamic NMR imaging and spectroscopy has been demonstrated and exploited for
decades, but only on modified prototype scanners
4-8.
This has limited the impact of such an approach in spite of the wealth of additional
information it brings on muscle physiological and biochemical regulation
1,4,9-11.
With the latest hardware configuration available on advanced commercial scanners,
obstacles have been lifted. Here we evaluated an interleaved pulse sequence
combining the NMR acquisition of a
1H image and
31P
spectrum in a clinical system without any hardware modifications done by the
customer. T
2* changes induced by the blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) response as well as the
phosphocreatine (PCr) and inorganic phosphate (Pi) concentrations were
monitored during and after exercise in the calf muscle.
Methods
Experimental Setup
Two healthy male subjects (29±1 years
old) participated in this study. The protocol was approved by the local
ethical committee. NMR examinations were done on the right calf muscle. An
amagnetic pneumatic ergometer interfaced with LabVIEW (National Instruments,
Austin, Texas, USA) was used during plantar flexions (starting resistance 70 N,
10 N increase every 90s).Experiments were done on a 3-T/60-cm bore Siemens
Magnetom Prisma MR system (Siemens Healthcare, Erlagen, Germany) equipped with the
multi-nuclear option. Contrary to previous models from this constructor, the 1H
and X-nuclei RF channels are separated, allowing an independent reception for
each nucleus. A dual-tuned 1H/31P flex transceiver coil was
used (RAPID Biomedical GmbH, Rimpar, Germany). The coil was wrapped around the
calf with the 11-cm-diamater surface 31P coil facing the gastrocnemius
muscle.
Interleaved NMR
Muscle BOLD response to exercise
and energy metabolism was studied within the same paradigm by interleaving a 31P
MRS non-localized acquisition and a GRE MRI module within a single repetition.
A data set was generated every 3 s over a total scan duration of 15 mins. Exercise
began after 1 min and lasted 5 mins (1/3 Hz pedaling frequency). Each data set
consisted of a 31P MRS spectrum (0.5-ms-long square pulse, 0.2 ms
acquisition delay, 1024 complex points, 4 kHz Bandwidth) and a T2*-weighted
1H Fast low-angle shot (FLASH) image (10 mm thickness, 256x64 matrix
size, 1.5x1.5 mm in-plane resolution, 330 Hz/Pixel). Images were acquired with
alternating TEs (= 5, 15, 25 ms).
Data Analysis
The raw interleaved data was first
exported and then separated and reconstructed into imaging and spectroscopy
data sets using in-house Matlab routines (The MathWorks, MA, USA). No motion
correction was applied. 31P spectra were zero-filled to 2048 points
and zero- and first-order phase corrections were applied. Normalized concentrations
were obtained by integrating the area under the curve of PCr (0±0.45 ppm) and
Pi (5±0.45 ppm) and dividing them by the PCr integral at rest. T2*
maps were estimated from each consecutive set of 3 images and were fitted with
a 2-parameter monoexponential function. Average T2* values
were measured over two regions-of-interest (ROI) in the gastrocnemius muscle.
Results
Figure 1 shows a single
31P
spectrum. Figure 2 shows the evolution of PCr and Pi during the experiment, depicting
a depletion of PCr to 55% at the end of the exercise. Figure 3 displays the time
courses of the average T
2* values in the internal and external
gastrocnemius, increasing from 25.2 ms at rest to 26.4 ms and 27.7 ms during
recovery, respectively. Figure 4 shows T
2*-maps
before and after exercise, evidencing the solicited muscles during plantar
flexions.
Discussion and Conclusion
A 1H/31P
interleaved pulse sequence was developed on a modern clinical scanner without
the need of hardware modifications from the customer. Although the sequence was
relatively simple, no major obstacles are foreseen for future extensions including
ASL perfusion, 1H spectroscopy of deoxymyoglobin, lactate editing or
localized 31P MRS. Motion correction13
and cardiac triggering14 could in principle also be included
to improve perfusion measurements quality during exercise.
The necessity of hardware modifications4-8,12 has severely hampered the diffusion and exploitation
of multiparametric acquisitions techniques by specialists of muscle physiology
and metabolism as well as by clinical investigators, despite the numerous
possible applications8-11. Having the possibility to run synchronous multinuclear sequences on unmodified clinical systems is
expected to accelerate and encourage their inclusion in clinical studies as
well as in providing new insights into muscular energy regulation processes.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Carlier PG, Bertoldi D et al. NMR Biomed. 2006; 19:954-967.
2.
Toussaint JF, Kwong KK et al. J Appl Physiol. 1996; 81: 2221–2228.
3. Gillies RJ. NMR in Physiology and Biomedicine. Academic Press: San Diego, CA, 1994.
4. Thulborn KR, Soffe NF and
Kadda G. J Magn Reson. 1981; 45: 362-366.
5.
Brillaut-Salvat C, Giacomini E et al. NMR Biomed. 1997; 10(7): 315-323.
6. Meyerspeer M, Schmid AI et al. ESMRMB (2015); 504.
7.
Brillaut-Salvat C, Giacomini E et al. Cell
Mol Biol (Noisy-Le-Grand). 1997; 43(5): 751-762.
8.
Meyerspeer M, Krssák E et al. MAGMA. 2005; 18(5): 257-262.
9. Baligand C, Wary C et al. NMR Biomed. 2011; 24(3): 281-290.
10. Duteil S, Bourrilhon C et al. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp
Physiol. 2004; 287: R 1441-1449.
11. Wary C, Nadaj-Pakleza A et al. NMD. 2010; 20(8): 548-558.
12. Kaggie JD, Sapkota N et al. ISMRM (2014); 3789.
13. Giraudeau C, Knowles BR et al. ISMRM (2015); 541.
14. Wu WC, Mazaheri Y and Wong EC. IEEE Trans Med Imag. 2007;
26(1): 84-92.