Razmara Nizak1, Joris Bekkers1, Pim de Jong2, and Daniel Saris1
1Orthopedics, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, 2Radiology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Synopsis
Autologous subchondral bone grafting
combined with ACI (sandwich procedure) is a well-accepted procedure for the
treatment of osteochondral lesions of the knee. This requires a
different surgical technique and preoperative planning. Also pain from bone
marrow donor site location is expected and should be part of patient consent
and expectations. This study evaluates whether MRI is able to predict the need
for a sandwich procedure to help in optimizing the preoperative planning and
consent.Purpose
Lesions
of the articular cartilage in the knee can cause serious reduction in quality
of life of patients and if left untreated can be the cause of osteoarthritis of
the joint.1 Autologous
subchondral bone grafting combined with autologous chondrocyte implantation
(sandwich procedure) is a well-accepted procedure for the treatment of
osteochondral lesions of the knee. Sandwich procedure requires a different
surgical technique and preoperative planning. Also pain from bone marrow donor
site locations is expected and should be part of patient consent and
expectations. However, the assessment of subchondral bone lesion and the need
for using autologous bone graft is only done per-operatively.
MRI
imaging plays an important role in diagnosing cartilage defects and the
follow-up. It is widely used as a pre-operative tool to estimate defect size.2
A systematic review by Blackman et al. showed a correlation between MRI
findings and clinical outcome after cartilage repair, proving it could be a
good way of non-invasive follow-up after surgery.3 However, there is
no evidence about the use of MRI for defining the need for a sandwich procedure
preoperatively. This study evaluates
whether MRI can help in diagnosing these subchondral bone plate lesions and is
able to predict the need for a sandwich procedure to help in optimising the
preoperative planning and consent.
Material and Methods
A total
of 109 preoperative MRI scans (PD and T2 sequences) of patients planned for ACI
were included. Sagittal PD images were obtained using a TSE sequence with voxel
size= 0.5x0.5x3mm, TR/TE= 4000/12 ms, FOV= 170x170 mm, FA= 90. The T2 images
were obtained with fat suppression using SPAIR/SPIR, voxel size= 0.5x0.5x3mm,
TR/TE= 3200/60 ms, FOV= 170x170mm, FA= 90.The integrity of the subchondral bone
and lamina were scored by four different observers (3 experienced radiologists,
experienced orthopaedic resident) as being intact or not. Also the depth of the
defect was measured perpendicular from the subchondral layer to the bottom of
the bony lesion. The area under the curve (AUC) for subchondral defect on MRI
(i.e. lamina or bone defect) and eventual sandwich procedure were calculated.
Also inter-observer Kappa values were determined using SPSS v21.0.
Results
The AUC’s
(0.75-0.82 for lamina and 0.67-0.82 for bone defect) and inter-observer Kappa’s
(ranging from 0.34-0.76) for lamina and bone defect were moderate indicating a
large inter-observer variation and moderate prediction of the need for a
sandwich procedure based on the presence of lamina and or subchondral bone
defect on MRI. However, depth measurements resulted in an AUC of 0.92 (95%CI:
0.87-0.97, p=0.001) with an optimal cut-off point at 5.5 mm depth of the lesion
(92% sensitivity, 80% specificity) to predict the need for a sandwich
procedure.
Conclusion
Our
results show that the integrity of the subchondral layer on MRI moderately
predicts the need for an eventual autologous bone graft to augment ACI whereas
a depth of the lesion above 5.5 mm accurately predicts the need for a sandwich
procedure.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Hunziker et al. An educational review of cartilage repair: precepts
& practice, myths & misconceptions e progress & prospects;
osteoarthritis cartilage, 2015 (23); 334-350
2. Campbell AB et al., Preopertive MRI underestimtes articular cartilage defect size compared with
findings at arthroscopic Kneesurgery; Am J Sports Med. 2013
Mar;41(3):590-5
3. Blackman AJ et al. Correlation between magnetic
resonance imaging and clinical outcomes after cartilage repair surgery in the
knee: a systematic review and meta-analysis; Am
J Sports Med. 2013
Jun;41(6):1426-34