Osteochondral lesion depth on MRI can help predict the need for a sandwich procedure
Razmara Nizak1, Joris Bekkers1, Pim de Jong2, and Daniel Saris1

1Orthopedics, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, 2Radiology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

Synopsis

Autologous subchondral bone grafting combined with ACI (sandwich procedure) is a well-accepted procedure for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the knee. This requires a different surgical technique and preoperative planning. Also pain from bone marrow donor site location is expected and should be part of patient consent and expectations. This study evaluates whether MRI is able to predict the need for a sandwich procedure to help in optimizing the preoperative planning and consent.

Purpose

Lesions of the articular cartilage in the knee can cause serious reduction in quality of life of patients and if left untreated can be the cause of osteoarthritis of the joint.1 Autologous subchondral bone grafting combined with autologous chondrocyte implantation (sandwich procedure) is a well-accepted procedure for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the knee. Sandwich procedure requires a different surgical technique and preoperative planning. Also pain from bone marrow donor site locations is expected and should be part of patient consent and expectations. However, the assessment of subchondral bone lesion and the need for using autologous bone graft is only done per-operatively. MRI imaging plays an important role in diagnosing cartilage defects and the follow-up. It is widely used as a pre-operative tool to estimate defect size.2 A systematic review by Blackman et al. showed a correlation between MRI findings and clinical outcome after cartilage repair, proving it could be a good way of non-invasive follow-up after surgery.3 However, there is no evidence about the use of MRI for defining the need for a sandwich procedure preoperatively. This study evaluates whether MRI can help in diagnosing these subchondral bone plate lesions and is able to predict the need for a sandwich procedure to help in optimising the preoperative planning and consent.

Material and Methods

A total of 109 preoperative MRI scans (PD and T2 sequences) of patients planned for ACI were included. Sagittal PD images were obtained using a TSE sequence with voxel size= 0.5x0.5x3mm, TR/TE= 4000/12 ms, FOV= 170x170 mm, FA= 90. The T2 images were obtained with fat suppression using SPAIR/SPIR, voxel size= 0.5x0.5x3mm, TR/TE= 3200/60 ms, FOV= 170x170mm, FA= 90.The integrity of the subchondral bone and lamina were scored by four different observers (3 experienced radiologists, experienced orthopaedic resident) as being intact or not. Also the depth of the defect was measured perpendicular from the subchondral layer to the bottom of the bony lesion. The area under the curve (AUC) for subchondral defect on MRI (i.e. lamina or bone defect) and eventual sandwich procedure were calculated. Also inter-observer Kappa values were determined using SPSS v21.0.

Results

The AUC’s (0.75-0.82 for lamina and 0.67-0.82 for bone defect) and inter-observer Kappa’s (ranging from 0.34-0.76) for lamina and bone defect were moderate indicating a large inter-observer variation and moderate prediction of the need for a sandwich procedure based on the presence of lamina and or subchondral bone defect on MRI. However, depth measurements resulted in an AUC of 0.92 (95%CI: 0.87-0.97, p=0.001) with an optimal cut-off point at 5.5 mm depth of the lesion (92% sensitivity, 80% specificity) to predict the need for a sandwich procedure.

Conclusion

Our results show that the integrity of the subchondral layer on MRI moderately predicts the need for an eventual autologous bone graft to augment ACI whereas a depth of the lesion above 5.5 mm accurately predicts the need for a sandwich procedure.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

1. Hunziker et al. An educational review of cartilage repair: precepts & practice, myths & misconceptions e progress & prospects; osteoarthritis cartilage, 2015 (23); 334-350

2. Campbell AB et al., Preopertive MRI underestimtes articular cartilage defect size compared with findings at arthroscopic Kneesurgery; Am J Sports Med. 2013 Mar;41(3):590-5

3. Blackman AJ et al. Correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and clinical outcomes after cartilage repair surgery in the knee: a systematic review and meta-analysis; Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jun;41(6):1426-34

Figures

Depth measurements on sagittal PD-weighted and coronal T2 fat-suppressed images

Table 1: Lamina defect. AUC ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 (mean 0.79) which corresponds with a moderate accuracy. Kappa values ranged 0.60 to 0.76 (mean 0.68), which is a good agreement between the observers. Table 2: Bone defect. The ROC curve showed an AUC ranging from 0.67 to 0.82 (mean 0.76) which corresponds with a moderate accuracy. Kappa values range 0.34-0.73 (mean 0.57), a moderate agreement between the observers.

Table 3: Lesion Depth. The depth measurements show an AUC of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.87-0.97, p=0.001) which corresponds with an excellent accuracy. Highest sensitivity and specificity found at a depth of 5.5 mm (sens: 0.92, spec: 0.80).



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
4491