Quantitative assessment of lumbar disc degeneration by non-Gaussian diffusion-weighted imaging
Masaki Katsura1,2, Yuichi Suzuki2, Akihiro Kasahara2, Harushi Mori1, Akira Kunimatsu1, Yoshitaka Masutani3, Masaaki Hori4, Shigeki Aoki4, and Kuni Ohtomo1

1Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, 2Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, 3Intelligent Systems, Graduate School of Information Sciences, Hiroshima City University, Hiroshima, Japan, 4Radiology, School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan

Synopsis

We performed q-space imaging(QSI) analyses for lumbar intervertebral discs(IVDs) in patients suffering from lower back pain with different stages of degeneration. We evaluated the correlation between the quantitative QSI measurements and the qualitative grading(Pfirrmann's scale) of disc degeneration. Our results suggest that the degenerative process of IVDs involves narrowing of the space for free water movement and a generally higher degree of microstructural complexity, in which we are unable to assess with conventional quantitative MR measurements. QSI may provide sensitive biomarkers for IVD degenerative microstructural changes and can potentially become a tool to allow characterization of various IVD pathologies.

Background

Degeneration of intervertebral discs(IVDs) has been implicated as a major etiologic component of lower back pain1. Morphological magnetic resonance(MR) imaging allows a grading of degeneration as assessed by the widely accepted Pfirrmann scale2. Diffusion-weighted imaging(DWI) has been applied for the quantification of IVD degeneration as the apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC)3, and is expected to reflect microstructural changes such as matrix composition(water, proteoglycan, and collagen) and matrix integrity. Conventional DWI analysis is based on an assumption that the water molecules follow a Gaussian distribution. However, human tissue including the IVD is a complex and restricted environment that hinders the distribution of water molecules, resulting in distributions that are far from Gaussian4. Q-space imaging(QSI) analysis does not assume a Gaussian shape for the underlying probability density function of water molecule diffusion5. QSI has shown promise for evaluating the microstructure of tissues in vivo because it can provide additional diffusion metrics, namely the root mean square displacement(RMSD) and apparent kurtosis coefficient(AKC)6, which give in vivo microstructural information that complements the ADC values. We therefore hypothesized that QSI analysis would be able to provide more information about degenerative changes in the microstructural complexity in IVDs.

Purpose

The purpose of the current study is to evaluate the correlation between the quantitative measurements obtained from QSI analyses and the IVD degeneration grades in patients suffering from lower back pain.

Materials and Methods

Thirty patients(mean age, 57.4 years) suffering from lower back pain were prospectively recruited in our institution. Prior to the study, the research protocol was approved by the institutional review board, and informed consent was obtained from each patient. Patients with history of spine surgery, major systemic disease(e.g. autoimmune disease), serious illness(e.g. tumor, infection), or spinal fractures, were excluded. Images were acquired using 3-Tesla MR(Signa HDx; General Electric). After routine fast spin-echo(FSE) T2-weighted sagittal and axial imaging, QSI data were acquired in the axial plane of the IVD between the fourth and fifth lumbar vertebrae. FSE T2-weighted images were not only used for anatomical reference but for the visual Pfirrmann grading of IVDs2. QSI was performed in accordance with previously published literature7 by using a spin-echo diffusion weighted echo-planar imaging sequence(Figure 1). QSI analyses were performed using the free software Volume-One 1.72(http://www.volume-one.org/) and dTV.II.FZR(http://www.ut-radiology.umin.jp/people/masutani/dTV.htm). Five equally sized circular regions-of-interest(ROIs) on the central slice of the axial plane(Figure 2) were manually drawn to measure RMSD and AKC values. The most anterior and most posterior ROIs(ROI 1 and ROI 5) were interpreted as anterior and posterior annulus fibrosus(AF), respectively. The ROIs in between(ROIs 2-4) were interpreted to represent the nucleus pulposus(NP). Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to measure the association between the qualitative clinical grading of disc degeneration(Pfi rrmann scale) and the quantitative diffusion values(RMSD and AKC). A P value less than 0.05 was considered to be significant.

Results

There were 2 discs(10.0%) classified as Pfi rrmann grade 1, 3(10.0%) as grade 2, 10(33.3%) as grade 3, 10(30.0%) as grade 4, and 5(16.7%) as grade 5. Histograms of the RMSD and AKC values within each ROI are shown in Figure 3. RMSD values in the NP regions of IVDs were found to decrease with the increasing Pfirrmann grades, while AKC values were found to increase. The results of correlation analysis are shown in Figures 4 and 5. For the ROIs 2-4(representing NP), there were significant negative correlations between the Pfirrmann grades and the RMSD values(Spearman's ρ= -0.58, -0.75, and -0.74 for ROI 2, ROI 3, and ROI4, respectively; all P<0.01), while there were significant positive correlations between the Pfi rrmann grades and the AKC values(ρ= 0.61, 0.72, and 0.70; all P<0.01). No significant correlations could be assessed for ROIs 1 and 5(representing AF) between the Pfi rrmann grades and the RMSD and AKC values.

Discussion

Water molecule diffusion in the IVDs is restricted in a complex manner by several factors such as extracellular matrix(e.g. collagen fibers and proteoglycan). In general, RMSD is not influenced by the viscosity of water, but by the space for free water movement5. AKC describes the deviation of the water diffusion pattern within a voxel from a Gaussian distribution, which is thought to reflect the changes in microstructural complexity8. Our results suggest that the degenerative process of IVDs involves narrowing of the space for free water movement and a generally higher degree of microstructural complexity.

Conclusion

The RMSD and AKC values obtained from QSI analyses may be sensitive biomarkers for IVD degenerative microstructural changes in which we are unable to assess with conventional diffusion-weighted imaging metrics based on an assumption of a Gaussian shape and model of water molecules.

Acknowledgements

Authors state that there is no financial relationship to disclose.

References

1. Luoma K Riihimaki H, Luukkonen R, et al. Low back pain in relation to lumbar disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:487-492.

2. Pfi rrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, et al. Magnetic resonance classifi cation of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:1873-1878.

3. Niu G, Yang J, Wang R, et al. MR imaging assessment of lumbar intervertebral disk degeneration and age-related changes: apparent diffusion coefficient versus T2 quantification. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1617-1623.

4. Karger J. NMR self-diffusion studies in heterogeneous systems. J. Adv Colloid Inter-face Sci 1985;23:129-148.

5. Callaghan PT, Coy A, MacGowan D, et al. Diffraction-like effects in NMR diffusion studies of fluids in porous solids. Nature 1991;351:467–469.

6. Assaf Y, Ben-Bashat D, Chapman J, et al. High b-value q-space analyzed diffusion-weighted MRI: application to multiple sclerosis. Magn Reson Med 2002;47:115-126.

7. Katsura M, Suzuki Y, Hata J, et al. Non-Gaussian diffusion-weighted imaging for assessing diurnal changes in intervertebral disc microstructure. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;40:1208-1214.

8. Jensen JH, Helpern JA, Ramani A, et al. Diffusional kurtosisimaging: the quantification of non-Gaussian water diffusion bymeans of magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 2005;53:1432–40.

Figures

Figure 1. Imaging parameters for QSI are summarized.

Figure 2. Positioning of the regions-of-interest (ROIs). Five equally sized circular ROIs were manually drawn on the central slice of the axial planes. Each ROI measured 20% of the midline disc diameter in the axial plane. The most anterior and most posterior ROIs (ROI 1 and ROI 5) were interpreted as anterior and posterior annulus fibrosus tissue, respectively. The ROIs in between (ROIs 2-4) were interpreted as nucleus pulposus.

Figure 3. RMSD (a), and AKC (b) values versus Pfirrmann grading within each region-of-interest (ROI). Error bars represent standard deviation.

Figure 4. Mean values (± standard deviation) of RMSD values (µm) in different regions-of-interest (ROIs) of the lumbar intervertebral disc for different Pfirrmann grades are shown. Spearman's rank correlation analysis showed significant negative correlations (* < 0.01) between RMSD values and Pfirrmann grades within ROIs 2-4 (nucleus pulposus), while no significant correlations were observed within ROIs 1 and 5 (annulus fibrosus).

Figure 5. Mean values (± standard deviation) of AKC values in different regions-of-interest (ROIs) of the lumbar intervertebral disc for different Pfirrmann grades are shown. Spearman's rank correlation analysis showed significant positive correlations (* < 0.01) between AKC values and Pfirrmann grades within ROIs 2-4 (nucleus pulposus), while no significant correlations were observed within ROIs 1 and 5 (annulus fibrosus).



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
4468