Effect of dystrophin levels on brain volumes in Duchenne muscular dystrophy mouse models
Bauke Kogelman1, Artem Khmelinskii2,3, Maaike van Putten4, and Louise van der Weerd1,4

1Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 2Division of Image Processing, Dept. of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 3Percuros B.V., Enschede, Netherlands, 4Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

Synopsis

Besides muscle, Duchenne muscular dystrophy also affects the brain, resulting in memory and behavior problems. The consequences of dystrophinopathy on gross macroscopic alterations in the mouse brain are unclear. We used a number of mouse models that express either 0%(mdx), 100%(Bl10-WT) or a low amount of dystrophin(mdx-Xist∆hs). We showed that while whole brain volume does not significantly differ between mdx and Bl10-WT mice, there are differences in volumes of individual brain substructures. These results are in line with human data, where brain volume was found to be reduced only in patients lacking both full-length dystrophin and the shorter isoform Dp140.

Purpose

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is an X-linked neuromuscular disease characterized by severe and progressive muscle weakness, due to mutations in the dystrophin gene, resulting in wheelchair dependency and death between the 2nd to 4th decade of life due to cardiorespiratory failure(1–3). Dystrophin, both full-length and smaller isoforms, is also expressed in brain tissue and its absence there is associated with behavioral and cognitive problems. The mdx mouse is the most commonly used DMD mouse model, which lacks full-length dystrophin (Dp427) and presents with memory and behavior problems(4,5). The consequences of dystrophinopathy on gross macroscopic alterations in the mouse brain are unclear. We investigated the effect of dystrophinopathy on brain structure in post-mortem mdx and wild-type control mice, as well as in a novel mouse model expressing low amounts of dystrophin, using high-resolution MRI after Gd-DOTA staining.

Methods

We used the following groups:

1. N=8 C57Bl/10ScSn-mdx/J (mdx) mice (0% dystrophin)

2. N=10 wild type C57BL/10ScSnJ (Bl10-WT) mice (100% dystrophin)

3. N=7 mdx-Xist∆hs mice: a mouse model with 1.08-12.18% dystrophin expressed in brain (measured in n=8 mdx-Xist∆hs mice of another study). Xist∆hs mice have an C57BL/6Jico background.

4. N=9 wild type C57BL10/ScSnJ-Xist∆hs (Bl10/Bl6-WT)

At the age of three months, mice were anesthetized with isoflurane and perfused for one minute with 1x phosphate buffer saline (PBS) and for four minutes with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA). The skull was stored in 4% PFA overnight and transferred to 4% PFA+1:40 v/v Dotarem (Manufacturer: Guerbet, USA) at 4°C for three weeks. Then they were transferred to a solution of 1x PBS, 1:40 v/v Dotarem and 0.01% sodium azide and a MRI scan was acquired after 24-48 hours.

Imaging was performed on a 7 Tesla Bruker Pharmascan with ParaVision 5.1, using a 23 mm volume coil. Scan details: 3D gradient echo (FLASH) with TE=5.3 ms; TR=15ms; FA=30°; FOV=[18x13x13]mm; zero-filling=1.34; matrix size=[256x186 x186]; isotropic resolution=0.070 mm; averages=12.

Brain segmentation was performed as described in (6) using a template image with 22 manually annotated structures (based on the Waxholm, Franklin and Paxinos and the Allen Brain Atlases using v5, FEI Software, Oregon, USA) (7–9), see figure 1.

Data was analysed using independent samples T-test in SPSS (v21). Analysis was done on absolute volumes data and in this exploratory study no correction was done for multiple comparisons.

Results

Effect of dystrophin

The whole brain volume of the mdx mice was not significantly different from Bl10-WT mice, although there was a trend for a larger brain volume, consistent with two previous studies showing a non-significant increase in whole brain volume in mdx mice (10,11). However, several brain structures showed an increased volume in mice compared to WT-Bl10, as shown in table 1. The mdx-Xist∆hs mice were compared to Bl10/Bl6-WT mice, where no differences were found between whole brain volume. However 14 out of 22 brain structures were larger in mdx-Xist∆hs mice compared to Bl10/Bl6-WT mice, as shown in table 1.

Effect of body mass and genetic background

Body mass of mdx mice was significantly larger compared to Bl10-WT, mdx-Xist∆hs and Bl10/Bl6-WT mice, due to disease-related muscle hypertrophy.

Unexpected large background effects, with Bl10/Bl6-WT background having 8.7% larger brain volume compared to mdx and Bl10-WT mice, prevented direct comparison between the strains. Therefore, mdx mice were compared to Bl10-WT mice and mdx-Xist∆hs compared to Bl10/Bl6-WT mice.

Discussion

From literature it is known that dystrophin is predominantly expressed in cortex, hippocampus and cerebellum(12) as shown in figure 1. Human data suggest that DMD patients have reduced brain volume(13), though this is most prominent in patients also lacking isoform Dp140, whereas mdx mice only lack Dp427. Similar to the human data, structural changes are wide-spread, involving many structures. Unexpectedly, we found small increases in volume. Future studies will therefore look into mice lacking Dp140.

Within our study we identified two important caveats for structural analysis in general. Firstly, a number of mouse studies used brain data normalized for body weight, but for this mouse model, the muscle hypertrophy results in increased body weight, leading to the erroneous conclusion that mdx brain volume is reduced. Secondly, even though our two mouse models have closely related genetic backgrounds (Bl10 vs Bl10/Bl6J, we observed a large background effect on the mouse brain volume, indicating that the background needs to be carefully controlled. More importantly, it is likely that the background will also influence the structural and behavioral phenotype.

Conclusion

This study shows that mdx mice have a have non-significant increase in whole brain volume. This is in agreement with patient data, where only patients lacking Dp140 show reduced brain volume.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

1. Bushby K, Finkel R, Birnkrant DJ, Case LE, Clemens PR, Cripe L, et al. Diagnosis and management of Duchenne muscular dystrophy, part 1: diagnosis, and pharmacological and psychosocial management. Lancet Neurol [Internet]. Elsevier Ltd; 2010;9(1):77–93. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70271-6

2. Kohler M, Clarenbach CF, Böni L, Brack T, Russi EW, Bloch KE. Quality of Life, Physical Disability, and Respiratory Impairment in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med [Internet]. 2005;172(8):1032–6. Available from: http://www.atsjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1164/rccm.200503-322OC

3. Moser H. Duchenne muscular dystrophy: pathogenetic aspects and genetic prevention. Hum Genet [Internet]. 1984;66(1):17–40. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6365739

4. Muntoni F, Mateddu A, Serra G. Passive avoidance behaviour deficit in the mdx mouse. Neuromuscul Disord [Internet]. 1991;1(2):121–3. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0960896691900592

5. Vaillend C, Rendon A, Misslin R, Ungerer A. Influence of dystrophin-gene mutation on mdx mouse behavior. I. Retention deficits at long delays in spontaneous alternation and bar-pressing tasks. Behav Genet. 1995;25(6):569–79.

6. Hammelrath L, Škokic S, Khmelinskii A, Hess A, van der Knaap N, Staring M, et al. Morphological maturation of the mouse brain: An in vivo MRI and histology investigation. Neuroimage [Internet]. 2015 Oct 14;125:144–52. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053811915009039

7. Franklin KBJ PG. The mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates. Academic Press; 2008.

8. Sunkin SM, Ng L, Lau C, Dolbeare T, Gilbert TL, Thompson CL, et al. Allen Brain Atlas: An integrated spatio-temporal portal for exploring the central nervous system. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(D1).

9. Johnson GA, Badea A, Brandenburg J, Cofer G, Fubara B, Liu S, et al. Waxholm Space: An image-based reference for coordinating mouse brain research. Neuroimage [Internet]. Elsevier Inc.; 2010;53(2):365–72. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.067

10. Miranda R, Sébrié C, Degrouard J, Gillet B, Jaillard D, Laroche S, et al. Reorganization of inhibitory synapses and increased PSD length of perforated excitatory synapses in hippocampal area CA1 of dystrophin-deficient mdx mice. Cereb Cortex. 2009;19(4):876–88.

11. Xu S, Shi D, Pratt SJP, Zhu W, Marshall A, Lovering RM. Abnormalities in brain structure and biochemistry associated with mdx mice measured by in vivo MRI and high resolution localized (1)H MRS. Neuromuscul Disord [Internet]. 2015;1–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26236031

12. Lidov HGW, Byers TJ, Kunkel LM. The distribution of dystrophin in the murine central nervous system: An immunocytochemical study. Neuroscience. 1993;54(1):167–87. 13. Doorenweerd N, Straathof CS, Dumas EM, Spitali P, Ginjaar IB, Wokke BH, et al. Reduced cerebral gray matter and altered white matter in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Ann Neurol [Internet]. 2014;76:403–11. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/ana.24222

13. Doorenweerd N, Straathof CS, Dumas EM, Spitali P, Ginjaar IB, Wokke BH, et al. Reduced cerebral gray matter and altered white matter in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Ann Neurol [Internet]. 2014;76:403–11. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/ana.24222

Figures

Figure 1: 3D gradient echo images were registered to a template brain and subsequently segmented using a brain atlas. In this figure three regions are shown where dystrophin is expressed in brain: Cortex, hippocampus and cerebellum.

Table 1: Volumes of different brain structures expressed in cubic millimeters. Mean volumes are presented together with the standard deviation. Mdx and Bl10-WT mice were compared to each other and due to background effects mdx-Xist∆hs mice were compared to Bl10/Bl6J. Significant differences (P<0.05) are indicated with bold numbers.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
4459