Veronika Rackayova1, Olivier Braissant2, Corina Berset3, Jocelyn Grosse4, Daniela Capobianco5, Paola Mastromarino5, Valérie A. McLin6, and Cristina Cudalbu3
1Laboratory of Functional and Metabolic Imaging, Center for Biomedical Imaging, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2Service of Biomedicine, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland, 3Center for Biomedical Imaging, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland, 4Laboratory of behavioral genetics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland, 5Sapienza University of Rome, Department of Public Health and Infectious diseases, Section of Microbiology, Rome, Italy, Rome, Italy, 6Swiss Center for Liver Disease in Children, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospitals Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland, Geneva, Switzerland
Synopsis
We investigated
potential therapeutic effect
of probiotic treatment with anti-inflammatory proprieties (VSL#3) in a rat
model of Chronic Liver Disease induced Hepatic Encephalopathy (HE). 1H
MRS at 9.4T revealed significantly lower increase of glutamine (typical sign of
HE) and better osmoregulation in the hippocampus together with overall better
performance in behavioural tests in treated animals. These results are very promising.Purpose of the
study:
Recent research brings more evidence that dysbiosis
accompanies many diseases: atherosclerosis, diabetes, obesity, colon cancer, chronic
liver disease (CLD)
1-3 and plays an important role in their
evolution/progression. Consequently appropriate modulation of intestinal flora
could improve the course or prognosis of patients with CLD by reducing
pro-inflammatory mechanisms in the gut, intestinal permeability and consequent
bacterial translocation as well as by decreasing intestinal ammonia production
(main toxin in CLD-induced Hepatic Encephalopahy, HE). In addition,
inflammation, acting alone or in concert with ammonia, may play an important
role in HE. Therefore, we aimed to investigate potential therapeutic effect of probiotic
treatment with anti-inflammatory proprieties (VSL#3) in CLD-induced HE.
Methods:
Bile duct ligated (BDL) rats were used to study
CLD-induced HE
4,5. Probiotic treatment (VSL#3) started 2 weeks before
BDL-surgery ('week -2') and was administrated daily by gavage (60 billion
bacteria/kg of rat) during the whole study. 38 adult Wistar male rats were
studied, divided into 4 groups: BDL-rats without treatment (‘BDL’,n=14),
BDL-rats+VSL#3 (‘BDL+VSL#3’,n=14), sham-operated animals without treatment (‘sham’,n=5) and shams+VSL#3 (‘sham+VSL#3’,n=5).
Longitudinal in vivo
1H-MRS was performed
on a 9.4T system (Varian/Magnex Scientific) using a home-built 14mm diameter
quadrature
1H-coil as a transceiver. First and second order shims
were adjusted using FASTMAP (linewidth=9-11Hz). A VOI of 2×2.8×2mm
3
localized in the hippocampus (due to its role in memory - symptom in HE) was measured
using the SPECIAL
6 spectroscopy sequence (TE/TR=2.8/4000ms,160averages).
Metabolite concentrations were calculated by LCModel using water as reference.
1H-MRS
and plasma measurements of bilirubin were performed before the BDL-surgery ('week
0') and 2,4,6 and 8 weeks after BDL. Open field test (motor activity) was
performed at 4,6 and 8 weeks after BDL-surgery to evaluate the degree of HE
7.
Faeces were collected before the treatment and after every two weeks for microbiota
analysis.
Results and
discussion:
Plasma measurements of bilirubin confirmed the
presence of CLD in both, BDL+VSL#3 and BDL rats, with no differences between
the two groups (Fig.1A).
BDL rats showed brain glutamine (Gln) increase (due to
ammonia detoxification) and subsequent diminution of other osmolytes (mIns,Tau,tCho) as an osmoregulatory, often incomplete response (i.e. continuous
increase of osmolyte sum and presence of mild brain edema)
8-10. In
this study,
1H-MRS revealed a significantly smaller increase in
brain Gln in BDL+VSL#3 (+107%) compared to BDL (+138%) at week8 (p=0.03)
together with a constant sum of osmolytes in BDL+VSL#3 (Fig.2D,F). This pattern
is also visible in Fig.3. Differences among other brain metabolites are
presented in Fig.2.
The increase of genus Bifidobacteria in BDL+VSL#3 is shown in Fig.1B. In addition, a negative correlation between increase of Bifidobacteria
at week4 and increase of Gln at week6 in BDL+VSL#3 was found (r=-0.64, p=0.05),
suggesting a positive treatment effect.
There was no significant difference in behavioural
test performance between BDL+VSL#3 and BDL at week8. However, the course of
the disease varied between both groups: BDL+VSL#3 did not show a significant
decrease in motor activity while the BDL group did (Fig.4A,B). This finding is
in agreement with the negative correlation between Gln and motor activity (r=-0.52,
p=0.004, valid in BDL+VSL#3 as well as in BDL), suggesting that increased Gln is
associated with the decrease in motor activity.
Interestingly, ~30% of treated animals did not display
the characteristic increase in brain Gln (Fig.2C). They also showed slight diminution in
the sum of brain osmolytes (Fig.2D) and very stable performance in
behavioural tests (Fig.4C,D), suggesting that in some individuals, VSL#3 may be
protective. Fig.5 shows the relation between Gln and
mIns/osmolytes in different groups. Since bacterial load could contribute to
this effect, we looked at the
amount of Bifidobacteria in 'low-Gln' compared to other BDL+VSL#3 rats: the
most striking difference was at week4 (Fig.1C).
Regarding the amount
of Bifidobacteria in 'low-Gln' compared to other BDL+VSL#3 rats, the most
glaring difference was at week4 (Fig.1C) that could stand behind the
difference in brain Gln. Fig.5 shows the relation between Gln and
mIns/osmolytes in different groups.
Conclusions:
In BDL rats VSL#3 treatment was associated with
positive effect on brain Gln, osmotic equilibrium and motor activity. Some
individuals showed no increase in Gln during the whole course of disease and displayed
significantly better performance on behavioural tests. These results are
promising. However further studies in which probiotics would act
synergistically with non-absorbable disaccharides (e.g. lactulose
11),
or poorly or non-absorbable antibiotics (e.g. rifaximin
12) are
needed to further potentiate the effect of treatment. Additionally, probiotics could
be used in an alternating fashion with antibiotics in order to avoid
multiresistant organisms
13. Nevertheless probiotics bring the
advantage of very mild treatment, easy administration, possibility to take on long
term and represent a safer, better tolerated therapy
14.
Acknowledgements
Supported by CIBM of the UNIL, UNIGE, HUG, CHUV,
EPFL, the Leenaards and Jeantet Foundations. EU: FP7-PEOPLE-2012-ITN project
316679 TRANSACT; The authors thank Prof Carmen Sandi (Laboratory of behavioral genetics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de
Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland) for her support in
behavioural part.References
1Shen et al, J Clin
Invest 2015; 2Lemon et al, Sci Trans Med 2012; 3Backhed,
Cell Host Microbe 2012; 4Biecker et al, J
Pharmacol Exp Ther 2005; 5Butterworth et al, Liver Int 2009; 6Mlynárik et al, Magn Reson Med 2006; 7Leke et al, Plos one 2012; 8Rackayova et al, Metab Brain Dis 2015; 9Cudalbu, Metab Brain
Dis 2013; 10Brusilow et al, Neurotherapeutics 2010; 11Morgan,
Metab Brain Disease 2007; 12Bajaj et Riggio, Hepatology 2010; 13Lighthouse,
Hepatol Res 2004; 14Ding et al, Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2014