Reduced GABA levels and altered sensory function in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Nicolaas AJ Puts1,2, Ericka L Wodka3,4, Ashley D Harris1,2,5,6, Deana Crocetti7, Mark Tommerdahl8, Richard AE Edden1,2, and Stewart H Mostofsky3,7,9

1Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States, 2F.M. Kirby Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States, 3Center for Autism and Related Disorders, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States, 4Psychiatry and behavioral sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States, 5Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, 6Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, 7Laboratory for Neurocognitive and Imaging Research, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States, 8Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States, 9Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States

Synopsis

Children with Autism often show difficulties processing sensory stimuli, but the underpinnings are poorly understood. Multiple lines of evidence suggest that GABA, the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the brain, plays a role in the pathophysiology of ASD. Here we show reduced GABA levels in children with ASD, which is associated with abnormal performance on vibrotactile tasks related to inhibition. We show that alterations in GABA can contribute to alterations in sensory processing in ASD.

Purpose

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a developmental disorder characterized by impairments in social cognition, communication, and repetitive behaviors1. In addition, difficulties with sensory stimuli have been increasingly recognized and are now included as a diagnostic feature of ASD. Multiple lines of evidence suggest that GABA, the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the brain, plays a role in the pathophysiology of ASD (e.g.2). It is well known that GABA plays a key role in regulating tactile processing3-5. However, the link between GABA and autism-associated impairments in vibrotactile processing remains unclear. GABA can be measured using edited Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) and we developed a technique to measure tactile sensitivity in children objectively, in tasks linked to inhibition6. In this study, in a large cohort, we aimed to investigate whether 1) children with ASD have reduced GABA levels, 2) children with ASD show altered vibrotactile processing, and 3) altered GABA levels are associated with abnormal tactile processing in ASD.

Methods

Subject and parental consent were obtained under local IRB approval. Eligibility: Children with ASD met the DSM-V criteria for ASD, confirmed using the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-Version 2 (ADOS-2). All Typically Developing Children (TDC) were free of criteria for psychiatric disorders using the Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents. Data were acquired in 37 children with ASD (10.69 ± 1.4 years, 6F) and 35 TDC (10.09 ± 1.25 years; 8F). Children had normal IQ. Imaging: GABA-edited MR spectra were acquired from (3 cm)3 voxels over right primary sensorimotor (Fig 1A&B) and occipital cortices using MEGA‑PRESS, on a 3T Philips ‘Achieva’ scanner (Philips Medical Solutions, Best, the Netherlands). Parameters: TE 68 ms; 14 ms editing pulse at 1.9 (ON) and 7.46 (OFF) ppm; TR 2000ms; 320 transients, 32-channel head coil. A T1w MPRAGE was acquired prior to MRS acquisition for voxel placement and segmentation (TR = 7.99 ms, TE = 3.76 ms, Flip angle = 8°). GABA levels were calculated against the unsuppressed water signal from the same voxel. Data were tissue corrected, normalized to a cohort (ASD + TDC) voxel average grey and white matter ratios as described previously7, and implemented within Gannet8. Behavioral: Children performed: 1) Static and Dynamic detection tasks (where the increasing (dynamic) sub-threshold stimulus is thought to act through feed-forward inhibition9); 2) Amplitude discrimination with- and without an adapting stimulus (linked to lateral inhibition10); and 3) Frequency discrimination (encoded through GABAergic inhibition3,11; FD).

Results

Sensorimotor GABA levels were significantly reduced in children with ASD compared to TDC (2.20 ± 0.44 i.u. and 2.40 ± 0.25 i.u. respectively, p = 0.016). There were no group differences in occipital GABA levels. For children with ASD, sensorimotor GABA levels correlated positively with dynamic detection threshold, with higher GABA levels indicating a higher detection threshold (Fig 2A). The difference between a static and dynamic detection threshold (Figure 2B) were significantly correlated with GABA levels within the entire cohort (R = 0.39, p < 0.005); this finding was driven by children with ASD (Fig 2B), such that those with lower GABA levels showed a reduced effect of sub-threshold stimulation. Amplitude discrimination performance after single-site adaptation correlated with GABA levels in TDC (R = 0.44, p = 0.019) but not in ASD (R =-0.21, p = 0.3; Fig 2B) and the effect of adaptation was absent in ASD. Tactile FD is correlated with GABA in TDC, which has been previously reported11 (R = -0.41, p =0.025; Fig 2C); this association was not observed in ASD.

Discussion

Sensorimotor GABA levels were reduced in children with ASD compared to TDC, while occipital levels are normal, consistent with previous work12. Tactile abnormalities in ASD were consistent with previous work, and the absence of the effect of either a sub-threshold stimulus, or an adapting stimulus, in ASD, is consistent with reduced GABA-mediated inhibition. Our correlative results are consistent with the prediction for children with ASD; reduced GABA level was associated with stronger effect of modulating stimuli (sub-threshold and adaptation). Finally, GABA levels in TDC are correlated with FD, which is consistent with published findings in healthy adults. While children with ASD do not show differences in FD performance, they do not show GABA-FD correlation, suggesting that GABA does not act similarly to TDC in terms of frequency encoding.

Conclusion

Children with ASD show reduced GABA levels, and are associated with abnormalities in tactile performance. Altered in vivo GABA levels might contribute to abnormal tactile-information processing in ASD. The GABA system may be a future and novel target for therapies in ASD.

Acknowledgements

NAJP was funded by an Autism Speaks Translational Post-doctoral Fellowship. This work was further supported by NIH P41 EB015909 and R21 MH098228 and NIH / NINDS: R01 MH078160; R01 EB016089

References

1. Rogers SJ, Ozonoff S. Annotation: what do we know about sensory dysfunction in autism? A critical review of the empirical evidence. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2005;46:1255-1268.

2. Rubenstein JL, Merzenich MM. Model of autism: increased ratio of excitation/inhibition in key neural systems. Genes Brain Behav 2003;2:255-267.

3. McLaughlin DF, Juliano SL. Disruption of layer 4 development alters laminar processing in ferret somatosensory cortex. Cereb Cortex 2005;15:1791-1803.

4. Juliano SL, Whitsel BL, Tommerdahl M, Cheema SS. Determinants of patchy metabolic labeling in the somatosensory cortex of cats: a possible role for intrinsic inhibitory circuitry. J Neurosci 1989;9:1-12.

5. Dykes RW, Landry P, Metherate R, Hicks TP. Functional role of GABA in cat primary somatosensory cortex: shaping receptive fields of cortical neurons. J Neurophysiol 1984;52:1066-1093.

6. Puts NA, Edden RA, Wodka EL, Mostofsky SH, Tommerdahl M. A vibrotactile behavioral battery for investigating somatosensory processing in children and adults. J Neurosci Methods 2013.

7. Harris AD, Puts NA, Edden RA. Tissue correction for GABA-edited MRS: Considerations of voxel composition, tissue segmentation, and tissue relaxations. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015.

8. Edden RA, Puts NA, Harris AD, Barker PB, Evans CJ. Gannet: A batch-processing tool for the quantitative analysis of gamma-aminobutyric acid-edited MR spectroscopy spectra. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;40:1445-1452.

9. Blankenburg F, Taskin B, Ruben J, et al. Imperceptible stimuli and sensory processing impediment. Science 2003;299:1864.

10. Tommerdahl M, Favorov OV, Whitsel BL. Dynamic representations of the somatosensory cortex. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2010;34:160-170. 11. Puts NA, Edden RA, Evans CJ, McGlone F, McGonigle DJ. Regionally specific human GABA concentration correlates with tactile discrimination thresholds. J Neurosci 2011;31:16556-16560.

12. Gaetz W, Bloy L, Wang DJ, et al. GABA estimation in the brains of children on the autism spectrum: Measurement precision and regional cortical variation. Neuroimage 2013.

Figures

Figure 1. A. SM1 voxel location, centered on the hand-region of the motor cortex and rotated to align with the edge of the brain. B. Spectra from all participants in the ASD and TDC groups. There were no differences in spectral quality between groups. GABA is significantly reduced in ASD.

Figure 2. A. GABA correlates with dynamic detection threshold in ASD. B. Effect of sub-threshold-stimulation correlates with GABA levels in the entire cohort, and ASD alone. C. Amplitude discrimination after adaptation correlates with GABA in TDC but not ASD. Tactile FD is correlated with GABA in TDC,but not in ASD.




Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
4429