Borjan Gagoski1,2, Patrick McDaniel3, André J. W. van der Kouwe2,4, Himanshu Bhat5, Lawrence L. Wald2,4,6, Elfar Adalsteinsson3,6, P. Ellen Grant1,2, and M. Dylan Tisdall2,4
1Fetal Neonatal Neuroimaging and Developmental Science Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States, 2Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States, 3Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States, 4Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States, 5Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc, Charlestown, MA, United States, 6Harvard-MIT Health Sciences and Technology, Institute of Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
Synopsis
Although heavily used in clinical fetal imaging due to its encoding efficiency,
the image quality of T2-weighted singe-shot fast-spin-echo (ss-FSE,
or HASTE) acquisitions is often compromised by fetal head motion. We have
implemented and tested an enhanced version of the HASTE acquisition scheme that
includes EPI-based volumetric navigators (EPI-vNavs) played each TR, enabling detection
and estimation of fetal head motion along six degrees of freedom in real time,
while maintaining equivalent T2 contrast in the fetal head compared
to the original HASTE acquisition. Purpose
Fetal brain MRI suffers from unpredictable fetal motion, limiting the
types of MR acquisition schemes practical for use in clinical settings to fast
single-shot encoding techniques, such as Half-Fourier-Acquisition Single-Shot
Turbo-Spin-Echo (HASTE). EPI-based volumetric navigators (EPI-vNavs) have been
embedded into a T
1-weighted MPRAGE acquisition scheme to successfully
detect and prospectively correct for head motion each TR
1, but only
postnatally. Standalone EPI-vNavs were successfully used to estimate fetal head
motion
2, and here we extend
prior work by implementing a novel combination of EPI-vNavs and HASTE readouts,
thus enabling detection and estimation of fetal head motion in real time (each
TR). We demonstrate quantitative measurements of fetal head displacement and
rotation per TR, and importantly, that the EPI-vNavs in the HASTE sequence do
not compromise HASTE image contrast in the fetal brain.
Methods
All
fetal scans were performed on a 3T Skyra scanner (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) using spine and body flex
receive arrays (30-36 coil elements). Pregnant women signed informed consent
forms approved by BCH’s IRB. EPI-vNavs were embedded in the standard HASTE
acquisition (Figure 1) where the EPI-vNav volume orientation could be
prescribed independently from the HASTE slices. The EPI-vNav was based on a 3D GRE-EPI
readout (TR=41ms, TE=13ms, voxel size=5x5x5mm3, FA=30,
FOV=30x30x12cm3, fat saturation=ON, TAC=738ms) and it followed the
HASTE readout (TE=119ms, voxel size=1.2x1.2x3mm3, FOV=30x30cm2,
partial Fourier=5/8, GRAPPA R=2). The minimum TR of the combined sequence was
1.5s including a ~350ms gap after the EPI-vNav readout to allow for full Mz relaxation before the HASTE readout (Figure 1). Nevertheless, all scans used TR=2s to safely comply with SAR limits.
Motion
detection and estimation from the EPI-vNav volumes followed the procedures
described in 2. An ROI was identified in the first EPI-vNav volume
that included the high-contrast areas of the skull base and cervical vertebral
bodies (Figure 4). This ROI was registered to each subsequent volume using the
FSL FLIRT tool to measure time series of 3 translational and 3 rotational
coordinates. When EPI-vNav volumes were acquired in a different orientation from
the HASTE slice slab, dark bands due to spin-history effects were observed, and
were manually masked out prior to the registration process.
Results
Figure 2 shows comparisons of a representative slice from the conventional
HASTE (Figure 2a) and vNav-HASTE (Figure 2b) acquisitions. Aside from the
saturated lipid signals in the vNav-HASTE acquisition (due to fat-saturation in
EPI-vNav readouts for improved image quality), the signal intensities and
contrast in the fetal brain and surrounding maternal/fetal organs looks
equivalent. Figure 3 shows EPI-vNav volumes from three different TRs of the vNav-HASTE
acquisition. One can clearly see the
dark bands through the EPI volumes, as the HASTE readouts loop through
different slices of the fetal brain. These dark bands are due to spin-history
effects from the HASTE acquisition, and do not affect the robustness of the
registration process or fetal head motion estimation. Figure 4 shows the head translation
and rotation plotted against time for one representative vNav-HASTE acquisition.
Position was measured at every TR even in the presence of spin history
artifacts from the HASTE readouts (Figure 4, yellow arrow).
Discussion/Conclusion
A
novel MRI sequence with volumetric EPI navigators in HASTE readouts enables
reliable detection and estimation of fetal head motion in each TR. The
navigators’ excitation pulses do not visibly impair image contrast of the
relevant anatomy in HASTE. In our current implementation, the motion estimates are
calculated offline using MATLAB scripts that require manual masking of an EPI-vNav
volume to segment the fetal head from the rest of the pregnant abdomen, and processing
time for calculation of the 6 motion parameters for one EPI-vNav volume takes ~6mins
on an Intel Xeon E50269 processor. Future work will address these limitations
with the goal of fetal head motion estimates that are calculated in real time,
enabling the possibilities for prospective motion mitigation in HASTE imaging. In
addition, future work will also integrate the vNav motion estimates with
post-processing algorithms that use multiple HASTE acquisitions of the fetal
brain prescribed in at least three different orientations, and apply
super-resolution reconstruction techniques to produce a single high-resolution
volume of the fetal brain.
Acknowledgements
NIH-R01EB017337,
NIH-1U01HD087211, NIH-R01EB008547, NIH-R01HD071664, NICHD-4R00HD074649-03, NIH-NIA-R21AG046657
and NICHD-R01HD071664References
1. Tisdall
MD, Hess AT, Reuter M, Meintjes EM, Fischl B, van der Kouwe AJ. Volumetric navigators for prospective motion
correction and selective reacquisition in neuroanatomical MRI. Magn Reson
Med. 2012 Aug;68(2):389-99.
2. McDaniel
P, Gagoski B, Tisdall MD, van der Kouwe AJW, Grant PE, and Wald LL,
Adalsteinsson E; Quantification of Fetal
Motion Tracked with Volumetric Navigator MRI Acquisitions; 23rd Annual Proceedings of the International
Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Toronto, Canada, June 2015.