Matthias Weigel1, Orso Pusterla1, Monika Gloor1, and Oliver Bieri1
1Dept. of Radiology, Radiological Physics, University of Basel Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Synopsis
A
high-resolution T1 mapping protocol for the spinal cord (SC) based on ultra-fast RF
spoiled gradient echo sequences with initial precise B1-Tx mapping was
developed. The measured T1 values for white matter (WM-SC) of 976ms and for gray matter (GM-SC) of 1154ms
deviate notably from the corresponding T1 values found for the human cerebellum
at 3T. This finding may partially explain the relatively low contrast between
GM-SC and WM-SC frequently observed in SC imaging. Furthermore, the knowledge of these
precise T1 values will allow to set up dedicated SC imaging protocols with an
optimized GM-SC/WM-SC contrast in the future.Purpose
Inflammatory
disorders of the central nervous system such as multiple sclerosis often
involve the spinal cord (SC) besides the brain. However, imaging of the SC
poses more technical challenges due to the smaller and more mobile structure.
Additionally, it is often observed that the SC exhibits a quite low gray matter
(GM) and white matter (WM) contrast in standard MRI protocols. In order to
develop optimized SC MRI sequences in the future and to facilitate a further tissue
characterization of the SC, a dedicated and precise T1 mapping protocol for the
SC was developed.
Methods
Fast T1 relaxometry
with high in-plane resolution was facilitated by using ultra-fast 3D RF spoiled
gradient echo sequences with Half-Fourier reconstruction (VIBE): FOV = 104mm x
208mm, resolution = 0.4mm x 0.4mm x 5mm, 8 slices in one slab, 100% slice oversampling,
GRAPPA parallel acquisition technique with acceleration factor 2, TE = 7.38ms,
TR = 13.3ms, no signal averaging per acquisition, TA = 50sec. The center of the
transversal slab, located between the cervical vertebrae C5 and C6, was
orthogonally orientated to the course of the spinal cord. The VIBE acquisitions
were performed alternatingly with flip angles of 5 deg and 15 deg until 42
acquisitions were completed for each flip angle resulting in a total experiment
time of 2x42x50sec = 70min.
The two differently
T1 weighted series of 42 image datasets each were co-registered using elastic
registration algorithms of the Elastix toolbox [2]. Based on the two
resulting averaged datasets of different T1 contrast, quantitative T1 maps of
the SC were calculated. For this, the signal equation for RF spoiled gradient
echo (and therefore VIBE) sequences was analytically solved for T1 according to
Ref. [3]. In order to achieve precise T1 values, additional mapping of the B1+
RF transmit field was performed as published by Ganter [4]. The resulting B1+
data was used for correcting the RF flip angle to the real (effective) value in
the human body. All measurements were performed on a 3T whole-body MR system.
Regions of Interest
(ROI) were drawn on the calculated T1 maps: For GM at the cornu anterius
and cornu posterius, left and right, thereby omitting the commisura
grisea with the canalis centralis, and for WM in the central part
between the corni posterii (i.e. the sulcus medianus posterior). The
two central slices of the slab were evaluated, the peripheral slices of the
slab discarded due to the immanent slab excitation profile.
Results
Figure 1
illustrates mean images of the VIBE acquisitions in one of the two evaluated
slices for both the 5deg and 15deg acquisitions. Figure 2 demonstrates a
resulting T1 map. Both Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 were extremely zoomed into the SC, since
it is the only region of interest.
Table 1 presents the assessed T1 values for GM
and WM of the SC.
Discussion & Conclusion
The
present work quantified T1 relaxation times in GM and WM of the SC. Since
elastic registration methods were employed, the impact of such techniques on
the resulting T1 values could be of concern. However, initial investigations
with different frame parameters showed that the impact on the T1 values was
practically negligible compared to the "natural scattering" of the T1 values.
It is worth to note that the mean
results determined for WM-SC (976ms) and GM-SC (1154ms) deviate notably from
the corresponding T1 values found for the cerebellum at 3T: approx. 900ms (WM-cerebellum)
and approx. 1500ms (GM-cerebellum) [5]. As a matter of fact, the measured small T1
difference for the SC of only 178ms may partially explain the relatively low
contrast between GM and WM frequently observed in SC imaging.
In the
future, the knowledge of these precise T1 values will allow to set up dedicated
SC imaging protocols with an optimized GM-WM contrast (e.g. magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo, MPRAGE). These
optimized SC imaging protocols may be expected to lead to further benefit in the MRI based
investigation and diagnosis of SC pathologies.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1]
Kearney H et al. Nat Rev Neurol 2015;11:327-338.
[2] Klein
S et al. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2010;29:196-205.
[3] Deoni
SCL et al. Magn Reson Med 2005;53:237-241.
[4] Ganter
C et al. Magn Reson Med 2013;70:1515-23.
[5]
Weigel M et al. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:826-35.