Chengcheng Zhu1, Xuefeng Zhang2, Andrew J Degnan3, Qi Liu2, Luguang Chen2, Zhongzhao Teng4, David Saloner1, and Jianping Lu2
1Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States, 2Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China, People's Republic of, 3Radilogy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States, 4Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Synopsis
Intracranial large artery atheroma is a major cause
of stroke, however its natural history is still poorly understood. In this
study we followed 63 symptomatic patients who had intracranial atherosclerotic
plaque for up to 3 years. Multi-contrast black blood vessel wall MRI and
clinical brain imaging were performed. Initial results included 22 patients who
were followed for 6 months showed an overall plaque volume progression rate of
0.8%, however with a large standard deviation (20.1%) and range (-45.9% to
40.1%). Patients with hypertension or low HDL tended to progress faster. The
feasibility of MRI for monitoring intracranial plaque pathological changes was demonstrated. Purpose
Intracranial large artery atheroma is a major cause
of stroke worldwide, however the optimal treatment has not been established
1. With the development of high resolution black blood MRI
techniques, intracranial vessel wall characteristics have been increasingly
studied as possible markers of neurological symptoms
2.
However, the natural history of intracranial atherosclerotic plaque is still
poorly understood. Previous longitudinal studies using angiography or
trans-cranial ultrasound failed to evaluate pathological changes of the vessel
wall
3. This study aims: 1) to evaluate the feasibility of MRI for
monitoring intracranial plaque progression in patients with recent stroke or
TIA, and 2) to preliminary investigate the possible risk factors correlated
with plaque progression and recurrence of ischemic events.
Methods
Study population: 63 patients (49 male, mean age 66) with recent stroke or TIA who
were identified with intracranial artery stenosis were recruited in the MIPP
study. 76 stenotic intracranial arteries were identified including 65 middle
cerebral arteries (MCAs) and 11 basilar arteries (BAs). Patients first underwent
baseline MRI imaging, and then were followed with repeated MRI at least once
(follow up time 3 months to 3 years). Recurrence of neurological symptoms during
the follow up period was recorded. All patients were under best medical therapy.
MRI
acquisition: For each visit, patients underwent multi-contrast high
resolution MRI of the plaque and clinical brain MRI. Plaque imaging included
black blood sequences: pre- and post-Gd contrast T1-weighted fast spin echo
(FSE), T2 and proton-density (PD) weighted FSE. An in-plane resolution of 0.4mm
and a slice thickness of 2mm were used. Brain imaging included T1/T2-weighted
FSE, FLAIR and DWI.
Image analysis: Lumen and outer wall boundaries were manually segmented
on T2-weighted images by a radiologist and the plaque area and volume were
quantified. Contrast enhancement on T1-weighted MRI was graded by three categories:
0: no enhancement; 1: possible enhancement; 2: obvious enhancement.
Statistics:
T-tests were used to compare the group differences. We documented patient clinical
characteristics and performed multivariable logistic regression analysis to
investigate their correlation with plaque progression.
Results
In this initial report,
we analysed data from 22 patients (18 male, age 56±13, stenosis 70.2±22.9%) with follow
up scan at ~6 months. 26 plaques were identified (22 MCAs, 4 BAs). Two patients
had recurrent TIAs; however, no additional infarcts were identified on DWI in
all patients. Overall there was no significant plaque volume change (annual
progression rate: 0.8±21.0%),
however with a big SD and range (-45.9% to 40.1%). Representative images of
patients with plaque progression (Figure 1), regression (Figure 2) and no
change (Figure 3) are shown. At baseline, 4 plaques showed no enhancement, 8
plaque showed possible enhancement, and 10 plaques showed strong enhancement.
At follow up, 5 plaques showed a category decrease in contrast enhancement,
while 17 plaques were un-changed. Regression analysis showed that there was no significant
correlation between clinical factors, contrast enchantment status, stenosis
values or baseline volume with progression rate (p>0.05). However, patients
with hypertension tended to progress faster compared with patients without
hypertension with a borderline significance (p=0.057) (Table 1), and there was
a moderate inverse relationship between baseline HDL levels and plaque
progression (Pearson’s r = -0.34, p=0.08, Figure 4).
Discussion
To our best knowledge, this is the first study that
reports the natural history of the intracranial artery wall. We showed that
high resolution MRI is feasible for monitoring intracranial plaque progression
even during a relatively short period of time. Plaque volume and contrast
enhancement changes were evident, indicating an active progress of the
intracranial plaque development. Therefore, vessel wall MRI has the potential
to evaluate treatment response in a short period of time, rather than waiting
for patient long-term outcome data. The current initial report is limited by a small
sample size and short follow up time, thus the statistics did not reach significance.
Plaque volume was used in this study as the only end point given that only two
patients had recurrent TIAs. In a previous reproducibility study
4, we have proved that plaque volume was more sensitive to detect
changes compared with plaque area.
Conclusion
High resolution vessel wall MRI is feasible to
monitor intracranial plaque progression and pathological changes in a short
period of time. These techniques can be potentially used to better understand
the natural history of intracranial plaque, evaluate treatment response, and investigate
risk factors associated with future ischemic events.
Acknowledgements
This study is supported by NIH grants
R01HL114118 and R01NS059944.References
1. Arenillas,
J. F. Intracranial atherosclerosis: current concepts. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation 42, S20-23, (2011).
2. Dieleman,
N. et al. Imaging intracranial vessel
wall pathology with magnetic resonance imaging: current prospects and future
directions. Circulation 130, 192-201, (2014).
3. Komotar,
R. J. et al. Natural history of
intracranial atherosclerosis: a critical review. Neurosurgery 58,
595-601; discussion 595-601, (2006).
4. Zhang,
X. et al. Scan-Rescan Reproducibility
of High Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Atherosclerotic Plaque in the
Middle Cerebral Artery. PloS one 10, e0134913,
(2015).