Which is the best predictor for histological grade of glioma: DWI, MRS, 11C-methionine -, and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose -PET
Keiichi Kikuchi1, Yoshiyasu Hiratsuka1, Shiro Ohue2, Shohei Kohno2, and Teruhito Mochizuki1

1Radiology, Ehime University School of Medicine, Ehime, Japan, 2Neurosurgery, Ehime University School of Medicine, Ehime, Japan

Synopsis

Various imaging modalities are commonly used for preoperative examinations of brain tumors. Here we evaluated the specificity of ADC, MRS, and PET-CT to predict the WHO glioma grade and identified potential correlations with the Ki-67 index as a marker of tumor cell proliferation. In this limited patients series, minimum ADC was the best predictor of the histological glioma grade and it was also significantly negatively correlated with the Ki-67 index indicating its potential as a reliable marker of cellular proliferation.

Introduction

Various imaging modalities are commonly used for preoperative examinations of brain tumors among which ADC mapping, MRS, and PET provide noninvasive, spatially specific information about tumor cellularity and metabolism. ADC has been shown to be negatively correlated with tumor cell density and is useful in assessing the glioma grade1-3, whereas MRS is useful in evaluating in vivo biomarkers to predict the tumor grade4. 11C-methionine (MET)-, and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET have provided new prognostic information beneficial for identifying metabolically active tumors5-8.

In this study, we investigated the capacity of DWI, MRS, and PET-CT to predict the WHO glioma grade and identify correlations to the Ki-67 index as a marker of tumor cell proliferation9.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 32 glioma patients (13 men and 19 woman; mean age, 55.5 years; age range, 22–85 years) who underwent MRI and MET- and FDG-PET examinations. MRS data were obtained from 29 patients. All patients were pathologically diagnosed via surgical specimens (G-II, 6; G-III, 5; G-IV, 21). The Ki-67 proliferation index was assessed by histochemical staining. All examinations and subsequent surgeries were performed within 2 weeks.

MRI examinations were performed using a 3-T system. DWI was obtained using a single-shot EPI sequence with b values of 0 and 1,000 s/mm2 with automatic generation of ADC maps. To obtain the ADC value of the tumor, several round ROIs of 10-20mm2 were carefully placed on the ADC map to include the area with the lowest ADC value, as determined with visually, while avoiding cystic, necrotic, or hemorrhagic components of the tumor. The ROI with the lowest ADC was chosen as the minimum ADC (ADCmin).

MRS data was obtained using the PRESS sequence technique (TR = 2000ms, TE = 144ms; volume = 8mL) from the VOI, including the solid components of the tumor and Cho/Cr ratios (Cho/Cr) were recorded.

PET studies were performed in a three-dimensional acquisition mode. MET-PET data were acquired for 20 min after the administration of a MET dose of 5 MBq/kg body weight. For the FDG-PET study, enteral and parental sources of glucose were withheld for at least 6 h before the examination. The PET scan was initiated 90 min after the administration of an FDG dose of 3.5 MBq/kg body weight. Emission data were acquired for 20 min. The highest standard uptake values (SUV) was chosen among the ROIs over the tumor as the maximum SUV (SUVmax) on MET and FDG-PET images. The SUV ratio (MET-SUV and FDG-SUV) was calculated by dividing SUVmax of the tumor by the mean SUV of the contralateral normal cortex.

Results

ADCmin, Cho/Cr, MET-SUV, and FDG-SUV of each glioma grades are presented in Table 1. There were statistically significant deferences in the ADCmin values between each glioma grade and between grade G-II and G-IV by MET- and FDG-SUVs. A box-and-whisker plot of the WHO grade and ADCmin is shown in Figure 1.

The Spearman rank correlation coefficients between the Ki-67 index and these four parameters are presented in Table 2. An inverse correlation was observed between the Ki-67 index and ADCmin (ρ= −0.6898, p < 0.0001, Figure 2), whereas there were positive correlations between the other three parameters.

Discussions

ADCmin, Cho/Cr, MET-SUV, and FDG-SUV have been well correlated with the histological grade in previous reports1-3, 6, 9. Among these parameters, ADCmin was found to be the best predictor of the histological grade in our patient series. However, any differentiation between MET- and FDG-SUV was only significant between G-II and G-IV. Some authors reported that MET- and FDG-SUV were reliable prognostic factors of glioma7, 8. In this study, we were unable to further investigate the prognoses of our patients because of the limited follow-up duration; therefore, we plan to conduct further investigations with continuous follow-ups.

The antigen Ki-67 index is reportedly the most reliable marker of cellular proliferation because of its expression in almost all phases of the cell cycle, with the exception of the G0 phase9. Our results showed that these parameters and the Ki-67 index were significantly correlated with glioma; therefore, ADCmin, Cho/Cr, MET-, and FDG-SUV may be reliable markers of cellular proliferation of in gliomas.

Conclusion

The findings of this limited patient series showed that ADCmin was superior to Cho/Cr, MET0, and FDG-SUV as a preoperative histological predictor of glioma. ADCmin was also significantly negatively correlated with the Ki-67 index and thus, should be considered as a reliable marker of cellular proliferation.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

1. Kitis O, Altay H, Calli C, et al. Minimum apparent diffusion coefficients in the evaluation of brain tumors. Eur J Radiol 2005;55:393-400

2. Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Kochi M, et al. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI with echo-planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;9:53-60

3. Karavaeva E, Harris RJ, Leu K, et al. Relationship Between [18F]FDOPA PET Uptake, Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC), and Proliferation Rate in Recurrent Malignant Gliomas. Mol Imaging Biol 2015;17:434-442

4. Astrakas LG, Zurakowski D, Tzika AA, et al. Noninvasive magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging biomarkers to predict the clinical grade of pediatric brain tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:8220-8228

5. Dhermain FG, Hau P, Lanfermann H, et al. Advanced MRI and PET imaging for assessment of treatment response in patients with gliomas. Lancet Neurol 2010;9:906-920

6. Matsushima N, Maeda M, Umino M, et al. Relation between FDG uptake and apparent diffusion coefficients in glioma and malignant lymphoma. Ann Nucl Med 2012;26:262-271

7. Van Laere K, Ceyssens S, Van Calenbergh F, et al. Direct comparison of 18F-FDG and 11C-methionine PET in suspected recurrence of glioma: sensitivity, inter-observer variability and prognostic value. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2005;32:39-51

8. Kim S, Chung JK, Im SH, et al. 11C-methionine PET as a prognostic marker in patients with glioma: comparison with 18F-FDG PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2005;32:52-59

9. Calvar JA, Meli FJ, Romero C, et al. Characterization of brain tumors by MRS, DWI and Ki-67 labeling index. J Neurooncol 2005;72:273-280 .

Figures

Table1

Figure1

Table2

Figure2



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
4357