Synopsis
Various imaging modalities are commonly
used for preoperative examinations of brain tumors. Here we evaluated the
specificity of ADC, MRS, and PET-CT to predict the WHO glioma grade and
identified potential correlations with the Ki-67 index as a marker of tumor
cell proliferation. In this limited patients series, minimum ADC was the best
predictor of the histological glioma grade and it was also significantly
negatively correlated with the Ki-67 index indicating its potential as a reliable
marker of cellular proliferation.Introduction
Various imaging modalities are commonly
used for preoperative examinations of brain tumors among which ADC mapping,
MRS, and PET provide noninvasive, spatially specific information about tumor
cellularity and metabolism. ADC has been shown to be negatively correlated with
tumor cell density and is useful in assessing the glioma grade1-3, whereas MRS is useful in evaluating
in vivo biomarkers to predict the tumor grade4. 11C-methionine (MET)-, and
18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET have provided new prognostic
information beneficial for identifying metabolically active tumors5-8.
In this study, we investigated the
capacity of DWI, MRS, and PET-CT to predict the WHO glioma grade and identify
correlations to the Ki-67 index as a marker of tumor cell proliferation9.
Materials and Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the medical
records of 32 glioma patients (13 men and 19 woman; mean age, 55.5 years; age range,
22–85 years) who underwent MRI and MET- and FDG-PET examinations. MRS data were
obtained from 29 patients. All patients were pathologically diagnosed via
surgical specimens (G-II, 6; G-III, 5; G-IV, 21). The Ki-67 proliferation index
was assessed by histochemical staining. All examinations and subsequent surgeries
were performed within 2 weeks.
MRI
examinations were performed using a 3-T system. DWI was obtained using a
single-shot EPI sequence with b values of 0 and 1,000 s/mm2 with
automatic generation of ADC maps. To obtain the ADC value of the tumor, several
round ROIs of 10-20mm2 were carefully placed on the ADC map to
include the area with the lowest ADC value, as determined with visually, while
avoiding cystic, necrotic, or hemorrhagic components of the tumor. The ROI with
the lowest ADC was chosen as the minimum ADC (ADCmin).
MRS
data was obtained using the PRESS sequence technique (TR = 2000ms, TE = 144ms;
volume = 8mL) from the VOI, including the solid components of the tumor and
Cho/Cr ratios (Cho/Cr) were recorded.
PET
studies were performed in a three-dimensional acquisition mode. MET-PET data
were acquired for 20 min after the administration of a MET dose of 5 MBq/kg
body weight. For the FDG-PET study, enteral and parental sources of glucose
were withheld for at least 6 h before the examination. The PET scan was
initiated 90 min after the administration of an FDG dose of 3.5 MBq/kg body
weight. Emission data were acquired for 20 min. The highest standard uptake
values (SUV) was chosen among the ROIs over the tumor as the maximum SUV
(SUVmax) on MET and FDG-PET images. The SUV ratio (MET-SUV and FDG-SUV) was
calculated by dividing SUVmax of the tumor by the mean SUV of the contralateral
normal cortex.
Results
ADCmin, Cho/Cr, MET-SUV, and FDG-SUV of
each glioma grades are presented in Table 1. There were statistically
significant deferences in the ADCmin values between each glioma grade and
between grade G-II and G-IV by MET- and FDG-SUVs. A box-and-whisker plot of the
WHO grade and ADCmin is shown in Figure 1.
The
Spearman rank correlation coefficients between the Ki-67 index and these four
parameters are presented in Table 2. An inverse correlation was observed
between the Ki-67 index and ADCmin (ρ= −0.6898, p <
0.0001, Figure 2), whereas there were positive correlations between the other
three parameters.
Discussions
ADCmin, Cho/Cr, MET-SUV, and FDG-SUV
have been well correlated with the histological grade in previous reports1-3, 6, 9. Among these parameters, ADCmin was
found to be the best predictor of the histological grade in our patient series.
However, any differentiation between MET- and FDG-SUV was only significant
between G-II and G-IV. Some authors reported that MET- and FDG-SUV were
reliable prognostic factors of glioma7, 8. In this study, we were unable to
further investigate the prognoses of our patients because of the limited
follow-up duration; therefore, we plan to conduct further investigations with continuous
follow-ups.
The
antigen Ki-67 index is reportedly the most reliable marker of cellular
proliferation because of its expression in almost all phases of the cell cycle,
with the exception of the G0 phase9. Our results showed that these
parameters and the Ki-67 index were significantly correlated with glioma;
therefore, ADCmin, Cho/Cr, MET-, and FDG-SUV may be reliable markers of
cellular proliferation of in gliomas.
Conclusion
The findings of this limited patient series showed
that ADCmin was superior to Cho/Cr, MET0, and FDG-SUV as a preoperative
histological predictor of glioma. ADCmin was also significantly negatively correlated
with the Ki-67 index and thus, should be considered as a reliable marker of
cellular proliferation.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Kitis O, Altay H, Calli C, et al.
Minimum apparent diffusion coefficients in the evaluation of brain tumors. Eur J Radiol 2005;55:393-400
2. Sugahara
T, Korogi Y, Kochi M, et al. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI with
echo-planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;9:53-60
3. Karavaeva
E, Harris RJ, Leu K, et al. Relationship Between [18F]FDOPA PET Uptake,
Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC), and Proliferation Rate in Recurrent
Malignant Gliomas. Mol Imaging Biol
2015;17:434-442
4. Astrakas
LG, Zurakowski D, Tzika AA, et al. Noninvasive magnetic resonance spectroscopic
imaging biomarkers to predict the clinical grade of pediatric brain tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:8220-8228
5. Dhermain
FG, Hau P, Lanfermann H, et al. Advanced MRI and PET imaging for assessment of
treatment response in patients with gliomas. Lancet Neurol 2010;9:906-920
6. Matsushima
N, Maeda M, Umino M, et al. Relation between FDG uptake and apparent diffusion
coefficients in glioma and malignant lymphoma. Ann Nucl Med 2012;26:262-271
7. Van Laere K, Ceyssens S, Van
Calenbergh F, et al. Direct comparison of
18F-FDG and 11C-methionine PET in suspected recurrence of glioma: sensitivity,
inter-observer variability and prognostic value. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2005;32:39-51
8. Kim
S, Chung JK, Im SH, et al. 11C-methionine PET as a prognostic marker in
patients with glioma: comparison with 18F-FDG PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2005;32:52-59
9. Calvar JA, Meli FJ, Romero C, et al. Characterization
of brain tumors by MRS, DWI and Ki-67 labeling index. J Neurooncol 2005;72:273-280 .