Kevin K. Zhang1,2, Shivani Kumar2,3, Robba Rai3, Armia George3, Bin Dong1,4, and Gary P. Liney1,2,3,4
1Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia, 2South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, 3Department of Medical Physics, Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia, 4Centre for Medical Radiation Physics (CMPR), University of Wollongong, Sydney, Australia
Synopsis
Real-time
lung tumour tracking and motion analysis is important in MRI-based radiotherapy
planning to inform treatment margins and to permit accurate delivery for
developing MR-Linac technology. This work describes a template matching
approach to provide 3D motion assessment of lung tumours from real-time 2D
images. Compared to previous work the TRAC technique utilises a multi-angled
correlation analysis of the target region to correctly identify the tumour
position. Results in both a moving phantom and in lung cancer patients show
that the technique is feasible, accurate and can be easily adopted in widely
used single plane cine imaging.Purpose
Analysis of lung tumour motion is important to inform
treatment margins in radiotherapy planning. With the developments of MRI
simulators and MRI-guided linear accelerators (MR-Linac)1,2,3 real time lung tumour tracking is one of the key
applications of interest.
A number of studies have used MRI for target
tracking: Rapid imaging in a single plane can
be used to monitor motion during free breathing but this cannot account for through-plane motion4. Simultaneous excitation of two orthogonal scan planes can be used to inform 3D location
albeit at a slower rate5. Another approach is to use template
matching of the real-time dataset to a priori 3D image data as has been done
in the liver6. Lung tumour motion is more challenging due to
respiration and variations in motion that are dependent on location and changes
during treatment. Nevertheless, template matching has been shown to be useful in
lung tumours7. The purpose of this study was to examine an advanced
template matching method called Texture Reformatted Angle Correlation (TRAC),
which utilises a semi-automated selection region for the target and the
production of a library of multi-angled templates.
Methods
All imaging was conducted on a 3T MRI scanner (Siemens
Skyra) using an 18 channel body receiver coil and a 32 channel spine coil. The methodology
involves 5 steps outlined in Figure 1. As part of our existing lung protocol, a
3D volume (HASTE) sequence is first acquired during free breathing with a phase
navigator echo (TE/TR=92/2000ms, resolution = 1.25 x1.25 x 4.0 mm).
This dataset is used to generate a library of target
templates from multi-planar reconstructions. In contrast to previous studies, local rigidity of the template matching
method5 is maximised by using a segmented region of interest (Figure
2). The second improvement of the TRAC method is extracting tumour templates from
both orthogonal planes with angle α = 0° and oblique planes (1°, 5°, 10°, -3°,
-5°, -10°).
A real-time motion sequence is subsequently acquired using a rapid single
sagittal plane 2D TrueFISP acquisition (TE/TR = 1.44/419 ms; in-plane
resolution 0.70 x 0.70mm and 4 mm slice thickness) with 30 phases
at 500 ms per frame. A searching area was defined which was twice the size of
the tumour in two respective dimensions to determine a template per frame. This was then matched to the
appropriate library template by calculating a cross-correlation coefficient8
to determine the tumour location at each frame.
An in-house developed MR compatible motion platform
was used to simulate breathing and a piece of melon was used
as the tracking target. A stationary 3D scan of the phantom was acquired as the gold standard volume. The phantom was then imaged during motion (±2cm, 0.1 Hz) to verify the methodology.
Results
The tests with both patient and phantom datasets produced accurate tracking results.
Figure 3 shows examples of the TRAC method; the green
rectangle is the locus of interest and the red oval indicates the matched target.
The individual matched templates for each frame are used to measure motion in three dimensions. For this patient, viewing these images in a cine mode revealed predominantly superior-inferior with some out-of-plane motion. Figure 4 plots the slice position and angle for each frame. In all frames except frame 1 and 2, the tumour stayed within the planes located at +0.77(mm) and -0.48(mm) and variations between -5°/-10° rotation.
Results from the phantom test showed repeatable in-plane and through-plane tracking over the course of three cycles.
The cross-correlation coefficient ranged from
0.74 to 0.83 in the patient test, and 0.90 to 0.92 in the phantom test, which is
explained by the simpler phantom texture.
Discussion
In
this study, an improved tracking method (TRAC) has been described for 3D motion
tracking of lung tumours and tested using in vivo and phantom data. The method
can cope with through-plane translations and rotation of the target to
accurately measure motion from a single plane acquisition. The method can be
adopted for MRI planned radiotherapy and shows promise for MR-Linac tracking. Future
work is ongoing to look at speeding up the post-processing efficiency and the
dependency on temporal and spatial resolution. This
approach is particularly attractive for MR-Linac systems where a fast single
plane acquisition image can be used as the basis for tracking.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. B W Raaymakers, J J W Lagendijk, J Overweg, J G M Kok, A
J E Raaijmakers, E M Kerkhof, R W van der Put, I Meijsing, S P M Crijns, F
Benedosso, M van Vulpen, C H W de Graaff, J Allen and K J Brown, Integrating a
1.5T MRI scanner with a 6 MV accelerator: proof of concept, Physics in Medicine
and Biology, 54(2009), 229-237
2. B. G. Fallone, B. Murray, S. Rathee, T. Stanescu, S.
Steciw, S. Vidakovic, E. Blosser, and D. Tymofichuk, First MR images obtained
during megavoltage photon irradiation from a prototype integrated linac-MR
system, Medical Physics, 36(6)(2009), 2084-2088
3. P. Keall, M. Barton, and S. Crozier, The Australian
Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Linac Program. Seminars in Radiation Oncology,
24(3) (2014), 203-206.
4. K. Mooney, T. Diwanji, X. Shi, W. D D’Souza, and N.
Mistry, Lung Tumor Tracking with Simulated Navigator Echoes, Proc. ISMRM,
22(2014), 4094
5. T. Bjerre, S. Crijns, P. M. Rosenschold, M. Aznar, L.
Specht, R. Larsen, and P. Keall, Three-dimensional MRI-linac intra-fraction
guidance using multiple orthogonal cine-MRI planes, Physics in Medicine and
Biology, 58(2013), 4943-4950
6. L. Brix, S. Ringgaard, T. S. Sorensen, and P. R. Poulsen,
Three-dimensional liver motion tracking using real-time two-dimensional MRI,
Medical Physics, 41(4) (2014), 042302(10pp)
7. L. I Cervino, J. Du, and S. B Jiang, MRI-guided tumor
tracking in lung cancer radiotherapy, Physics in Medicine and Biology,
56(2011), 3773-3785
8. L. Ding, A. Goshtasby, and M. Satter, Volume
image registration by template matching, Image and Vision Computing, 19(2001), 821-832