Daniel Daniel Hernandez1, Eric Michel1, Ki Soo Kim1, and Soo Yeol Lee1
1Bio-medical engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yogin, Korea, Republic of
Synopsis
We propose a method to correct phase drift artifact from MR thermometry measurements with the use of Magnetic field monitoring (MFM). Field variations are measured with an array of MFM probes and correction maps are computed from the frequency shifts of FID signals. This method allows to have better resolution and can be used with any MR thermometry pulse sequence.Purpose
Phase
drift correction methods in MR temperature mapping are based on computing
correction maps by polynomial fitting of phase shifts at reference points. Such
reference phase shifts are measured either from extra oil phantoms placed
around the imaging object or from fatty tissues inside the object. However, the
use of oil phantoms necessitates a large FOV thereby limiting the spatial resolution
of MR images, and it could limit oblique scanning. Correction with phase
reference at fatty tissues has also limitations in low fat region apart from
need of a special pulse sequence to separate fat region from water region.
In
this work, we explore the use of magnetic field monitoring (MFM) to correct main
field drift effects even at the region of low fat concentration, avoiding the
use of extra phantoms and potentially allowing oblique scanning.
Method
Temperature
measurement in MR thermometry is based on the proton resonance frequency (PRF)1
shift of water molecules, which states that the temperature change ΔT in an object is proportional to the
phase difference Δϕ from the
reference time. The temperature change is given as:
$$$ \triangle T=\frac{\triangle\phi}{\alpha TE \gamma B_{0}} $$$ (1)
where γ is
the gyromagnetic ratio, B0 is the main magnetic field strength, and
α is the thermal coefficient of proton resonance frequency shift of water
molecule (-0.01 ppm/°C). Phase drift is corrected by subtracting the correction
map ΔϕB from equation 1:
$$$ \triangle T=\frac{\triangle\phi -\triangle \phi_{B}}{\alpha TE \gamma B_{0}} $$$ (2)
The maps ΔϕB
were computed from the frequency shifts of FID signals, acquired by an array of
MFM probes2-3 attached around a Birdcage coil. For comparison
proposes, we also placed four oil tubes around the object to get reference phases
for computing the correction maps.
Figure 1
shows the MFM and MR thermometry pulse sequences. First, FID signals were
acquired with four MFM probes, which were excited with a 1W rectangular pulse
with a pulse length of 11us. The data acquisition of 10,000 samples was done
with a sampling interval of 10us. Phase information was obtained from a gradient
echo sequence with TR/TE of 150/10ms, flip angle of 60° and field of view of
230x230 mm2. This sequence was repeated 8 times every 5 minutes.
Images were acquired from a tissue-mimicking agar phantom4 that has
electrical conductivity of 0.1 S/m at the background region. In the middle of
the phantom was a tumor-tissue-mimicking insert that has electrical
conductivity of 0.6 S/m. In addition, an optic fiber temperature sensor was
inserted to the center of the phantom to evaluate accuracy of MR thermometry.
Results & Discussion
Phase correction
maps were computed by bilinear interpolation of the frequency shifts at MFM probes
or the phase shifts at the oil tubes, and they are shown in Fig. 2. The
correction maps obtained with MFM are similar to the oil reference correction
maps.
In the
temperature maps without correction (Fig. 3A), the effect of phase drift is
evident. The temperature change at the end of 40 minutes experiments is about 2°C
even though the optic fiber temperature sensor reads constant temperature at
the middle of the phantom. In addition to that, the temperature change is space
variant. After applying Eq.2, the temperature map is corrected as shown in Fig.
3C whereas Fig. 3B shows the temperature maps corrected by the oil reference
method.
Figure 4 compares the temperatures measured with the optic fiber sensor and
the MR thermometry with and without correction. The temperature at the center
of the phantom remained constant at 18°C during the 40 minutes when read by the
optic fiber sensor. For an ROI of 3x3 located at the center of the phantom, the
average temperature over time for the PRF method without correction was 17.6° with
the standard deviation of 0.26°; whereas the average and standard deviation for
the corrected maps with oil-reference method and MFM reference method were
18.03°± 0.24 and 17.95°± 0.07, respectively.
Conclusions
We introduced a method to correct the phase drift effects in MR
thermometry by using magnetic field monitoring. The proposed method can be used
in combination with any MR thermometry pulse sequence without making any changes
in the sequence. In addition, the use of MFM probes allows to have better
resolution because the reference points are not inside the FOV. This method has
also a potential to make oblique temperature maps if more MFM probes are placed
surrounding the desired FOV.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by ERC program (2015 R1A5A1 037656) of NRF in Korea and by Samsung Electronics.
References
1)
Rieke, V. and
Butts Pauly, K. (2008), MR thermometry. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging,
27: 376–390.
2)
De Zanche,
N., Barmet, C., Nordmeyer-Massner, J. A., & Pruessmann, K. P. (2008). NMR probes for measuring
magnetic fields and field dynamics in MR systems. Magn Reson Med, 60(1), 176-186.
3)
Eric
Michel, Daniel Hernandez, Min Hyoung Cho, and Soo Yeol Lee, (2015) Design of
Sample-Immersed Microcoil (SIM) Probes and their Magnetic Field Monitoring
Capabilities. Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 23
4) Kim, K. S., Hernandez, D., & Lee, S. Y. (2015). Time-multiplexed
two-channel capacitive radiofrequency hyperthermia with nanoparticle
mediation. Biomedical engineering online, 14(1), 95.