Kwan-Jin Jung1, Andrea Willhite2, and Susan Harkema2
1Radiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States, 2Neurosurgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States
Synopsis
The
phase offset in the phase contrast MR flow imaging was corrected using an
image-based method in order to account for the spatially inhomogeneous and
subject-dependent phase offset. The phase shift on the flow region was
estimated iteratively from the phase shift of the stationary tissue using the
low spatial distribution of the phase offset. This phase offset correction
method with an automated segmentation and iterative estimation of the phase
offset allowed us to study the cerebrospinal fluid flow in the spinal
subarachnoid space of ten healthy and ten spinal cord injury participants
reliably without elaborate manual effort.Purpose
In
spinal cord injury patients (SCI), the flow of the spinal cerebrospinal fluid
(CSF) has been studied due to its important physiological role. However, the
velocity-encoding gradient induces an eddy current which results in a baseline
phase offset in MR phase contrast cine flow measurement. A widely adopted
method is to use the phase offset in a manually selected adjacent stationary
tissue as a reference phase offset.
1
However, the phase offset due to eddy current is spatially inhomogeneous and
the reference stationary tissue can include small vessels and motion. Another approach is the image-based
extraction of the phase offset.
2 This method is further developed to study the
spinal CSF flow in a large number of participants reliably in an automated
procedure.
Methods
The
phase offset image can be segmented into stationary tissue, background, and
regions with flow using a spectral decomposition of the cine flow images in a
complex data format in the cardiac cycle direction.
3 Since the cardiac pulsation and the resulting
fluctuation of CSF flow are in a lower temporal frequency, the sum-of-square of
the 1st through 3rd harmonic components selects the image regions with
fluctuating flow. The phase shift in the flow and background region can be
initialized to an averaged phase shift of the stationary tissue. Assuming a
very low spatial frequency of the magnetic field induced from the eddy current,
the initial composite phase image is smoothed with a 2-D Gaussian smoothing
kernel (standard deviation = 1.5). The phase shift at the flow and background is
substituted with the smoothed phase shift. The phase shift at the flow and
background is updated iteratively by repeating the composition of the phase shift
followed by smoothing (Fig. 1). After
sufficient iterations, the smoothed composite phase shift can be considered as the
estimated phase offset due to the eddy current. The CSF flow velocity in the
cranial-caudal direction was measured at the 4th cervical spine level of 10
healthy and 10 chronic SCI participants with an injury below C3 using a 3 Tesla
MRI system, the velocity-encoding gradient of 10 cm/s, and a peripheral pulse
gating. The cyclic flow rates (a summation of volume flow rates times with the heart
period in one cardiac cycle) in the two populations were averaged over the spinal subarachnoid
space and statistically analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U-test for the
confidence level of p < 0.05.
Results
The 0th
component represented the stationary tissue, while the higher order components
included the vessels, CSF, and tissue with a motion. The CSF flow was mostly
collected at the 1st through 3rd harmonic components, while the flow in the
carotid arteries was spread out over the spectral range. A flow mask image was
constructed by thresholding the sum-of-square image of the 1st through 3rd
harmonic components as shown in Fig. 2.
The initial
phase shift obtained from a smoothed composite phase shift is shown in Fig. 3A. After 11 iterations, the initial
phase shift was refined to the phase shift induced by the eddy current as shown
in Fig. 3B and Fig. 3C. The phase shift was indeed
spatially inhomogeneous with a low spatial frequency.
The effect
of the phase offset correction was demonstrated as the velocity map at the
first cardiac phase (Fig. 4) and the flow curve over two cardiac
cycles (Fig. 5). The polarity of velocity was
positive for the flow direction from foot to head. Therefore, the negative
directional flow corresponded to the systole of the cardiac cycle. It was
noticeable that the phase (or velocity) offset varied significantly among
subjects in addition to spatial variation within a subject. The cyclic flow
rates were in the caudal direction (negative polarity) as -0.057 and -0.014 ml/cycle
for the healthy and SCI participants, respectively, with a statistical
significance.
4Conclusions
The
phase offset in the phase contrast MR flow images was confirmed to be spatially
inhomogeneous and it varied among subjects. The flow region was segmented
automatically using a spectral decomposition of the cine flow images. The phase
offset on the flow region was estimated using an iterative
estimation with a constraint of a low spatial frequency of the phase offset.
The proposed phase offset correction method was confirmed by
studying the cyclic flow rates of CSF in the spinal subarachnoid space of
healthy and SCI participants.
Acknowledgements
This work
was partially supported by: Kessler Foundation, the Leona M. and Harry B.
Helmsley Charitable Trust, Kentucky Spinal Cord Research Center, University of
Louisville Foundation, Jewish Hospital and St. Mary’s Foundation. Dr. Maxwell
Boakye granted the use of MRI images of healthy volunteers.References
1. ElSankari S, et al. Concomitant analysis of
arterial, venous, and CSF flows using phase-contrast MRI: a quantitative
comparison between MS patients and healthy controls. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab
2013;33(9):1314-1321.
2. Walker PG, et al. Semiautomated method for
noise reduction and background phase error correction in MR phase velocity
data. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI 1993;3(3):521-530.
3. Cho ZH, et al. MR Fourier transform
arteriography using spectral decomposition. Magnetic resonance in medicine :
official journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine / Society of
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 1990;16(2):226-237.
4. Edsbagge
M, et al. Spinal CSF absorption in healthy individuals. Am J Physiol Regul
Integr Comp Physiol 2004;287(6):R1450-1455.