Xiao Chen1, Christopher C. Cline1,2, Boris Mailhe1, Qiu Wang1, and Mariappan S. Nadar1
1Medical Imaging Technologies, Siemens Healthcare, Princeton, NJ, United States, 2Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
Synopsis
In MRF, a single image is reconstructed from data
collected from each short TR due to the non-repeatable magnetization history. The
highly-undersampled single-shot imaging leads to high levels of noise and
artifacts. In this study, an SR preparation module was introduced to MRF, enabling
multi-shot MRF without a waiting time for magnetization recovery. The SR
prepared multi-shot MRF can achieve similar or even better accuracy than the original
single-shot IR prepared MRF with the same amount of data collected.Purpose
Magnetic Resonance
Fingerprinting (MRF) excites the imaging object with an inversion recovery (IR)
RF pulse followed by a sequence of RF pulses with randomized flip angles (FA) and
repetition times (TR) [1]. A
single image is reconstructed from data collected from each short TR due to
the non-repeatable magnetization history. The highly-undersampled single-shot
imaging leads to high levels of noise and artifacts, and requires increased
temporal frames in order to achieve accurate fingerprint matching. Saturation
recovery (SR) is a commonly used preparation scheme in conventional MR to reset
the magnetization to zero, which can be utilized to achieve a “multi-shot” MRF
acquisition without waiting for magnetization recovery. However, the SR,
instead of IR, may decrease the dynamic range of the magnetization in MRF. In
this work, we show that an SR prepared multi-shot MRF can achieve similar or
even better accuracy than the original IR prepared MRF with the same amount of
data collected.
Methods
SR prepared MRF Sequence:
An SR module including a 90˚ RF pulse with spoiling
gradients applied before and after the 90˚ pulse was used to reset the
magnetization spins to zero before each MRF repetition (Figure 1). No
relaxation waiting time is needed between each repetition. A different part of k-space
can then be sampled with each repetition, making this a multi-shot acquisition.
To compensate for the decreased dynamic range due
to the saturation recovery, an SR and IR (SR+IR) hybrid MRF sequence was also proposed.
In the SR+IR case, an SR module was applied at the beginning of each
repetition, and one or more IR pulses were used during each repetition (Figure 1).
Experiment design:
For each of the IR, SR and SR+IR MRF sequences,
1000 TRs were simulated using a balanced SSFP acquisition. Pseudorandom FAs
with the same pattern and amplitude were used for all the sequences. A single
spiral was acquired within each TR (~14ms). Repetitions of 2 and 4 were
simulated for SR based MRF, resulting in 2 spirals/image x 500 images and 4
spirals/image x 250 images, respectively (Table 1). Multiple spirals were
distributed uniformly within each image and were rotated by 2pi/48 for
succeeding images. Ground truth T1, T2 and proton density brain maps were
obtained from BrainWeb [2], zero padded to matrix
size 256x256. Off-resonance values ranged linearly from -60Hz to 60Hz.
Reconstruction:
An accelerated iterative MRF (AIR-MRF)
reconstruction method [3], integrated with dictionary compression and fast
searching were developed and used to reconstruct the MRF data. Briefly, the
reconstruction compressed the images and the fingerprints in the dictionary along
the temporal direction, and iteratively updated estimates in the compressed
image space and the tissue parameter space. An approximate nearest neighbor
search [4] was used instead of an
exhaustive search to speed up the reconstruction. The dictionary contained
around 51k atoms, covering normal brain tissue T1, T2 and off-resonance ranges.
Dictionary compression through SVD [5] was used to compress
the fingerprint length (see Table 1).The number of iterations was fixed at 5
with sufficient convergence typically observed.
The reconstructed parameter maps were compared to the ground truth and normalized mean square error (NMSE) was utilized to quantify the results.
Results
Figure 2 shows example T1, T2 maps from several
sequences, along with ground truth and corresponding error maps. Zoomed-in T1
and T2 maps from all tested sequences are shown in Figure 3. Less noise can be
observed on the SR+IR results in the grey and white matter regions, compared to
the IR and SR. The SR+IR presented similar quality on the dura mater region as
the IR, better than the SR. Figure 4 shows the NMSE analysis and the
reconstruction time of all the tested sequences. The SR+IR at different
repetitions achieved better performances than IR.
Conclusions
In this study, an SR
preparation module was introduced to MRF, enabling multi-shot MRF without a
waiting time for magnetization recovery. Thanks to the non-steady-state
property of MRF, IR pulses were combined with SR to compensate (to some extent)
for the shortage of the decreased magnetization range and the hybrid SR+IR
sequence achieved better parameter estimation than using SR alone. The
multi-shot SR+IR MRF achieved similar or even better parameter estimation than
the single-shot IR MRF. With the multi-shot scheme, MRF can be readily extended
to Cartesian trajectory sampling, 3D imaging, etc., using conventional MRI
techniques. The SR preparation may open the door for MRF to more applications
and easy implementation. Future study will include implementing the sequence
and validating on real acquired data.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] D. Ma, V. Gulani, N. Seiberlich, K. Liu, J. L. Sunshine, J.
L. Duerk, and M. A. Griswold. Magnetic resonance fingerprinting. Nature 2013;495:187–192
[2] BrainWeb: Simulated Brain Database. [Online]. Available:
http://brainweb.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/. [Accessed:
08-Sep-2015].
[3] C.C. Cline, X. Chen, B. Mailhe, Q. Wang, and
M. Nadar. Accelerated iterative reconstruction for magnetic
resonance fingerprinting (AIR-MRF). ISMRM 2016.
[4] M. Muja and D. G. Lowe. Fast Approximate Nearest Neighbors
with Automatic Algorithm Configuration. VISAPP 2009; 1(2).
[5] D. F. McGivney, E.
Pierre, D. Ma, Y. Jiang, H. Saybasili, V. Gulani, and M. A. Griswold. SVD
Compression for Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting in the Time Domain. IEEE
Trans. Med. Imaging 2014;33(12):2311–22.