Automatic Gradient Predistortion Applied to Clinical 2D-UTE
Kevin D Harkins1, Mary Katherine Manhard1,2, William A Grissom1,2,3, and Mark D Does1,2,3,4

1Institute of Image Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States, 2Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States, 3Electrical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States, 4Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States

Synopsis

Transient gradient waveform errors can degrade MRI quality. This work presents an automatic implementation of gradient waveform predistortion, which has been applied to half-pulse excited 2D-ultrashort echo time imaging. The predistortion method reliably improves image quality and quantification of ultrashort T2 species by reducing out-of-slice signal that contaminates half-pulse excited images.

Purpose

Errors in gradient waveforms used for RF excitation or encoding during signal acquisition can significantly degrade MR image quality. For example, errors in half-pulse (HP) slice selection1, commonly used in 2D ultrashort echo time (UTE) imaging, can lead to errors in the evaluation of short-T2 signals present in several tissues, including bone2,3. In HP-UTE, two acquisitions excited with complementary half pulses are digitally combined to cancel unwanted out-of-slice signal, resulting in the desired excitation profile. However, gradient errors caused by eddy currents or gradient amplifier limitations can cause these two half-pulses to be out of alignment, and out-of-slice signal to be present within 2D-UTE images.

While several methods have been proposed to account for gradient errors, including methods specifically applied to HP-UTE4-6, these methods usually require careful calibration before imaging. In this abstract, we present an automatic method to perform gradient predistortion to optimize HP-UTE slice selection.

Methods

All MRI experiments were collected on a 3T Philips Achieva system with a Philips 8 channel knee coil for reception. After scout images were acquired, a RF waveform and a bipolar slice-select gradient waveform were automatically generated based upon gradient slew and acceleration rate limits. Gradient waveforms were measured7, and iterative predistortion was performed using the update rule:

$$ G_{app}^{i+1}=G_{app}^{i}+K\Delta $$

where Gapp is the applied gradient waveform, ∆ is the difference between the ideal and measured gradient waveforms, and

$$ K=\kappa\left(A^tA-\lambda I\right)^{-1}A $$

Here, the matrix A represents an estimate of a linear system response, while $$$\kappa$$$ (=1) and $$$\lambda$$$ (=0.5) are regularization parameters6. For each iteration, the sequence to measure gradient waveforms lasted 20 s, and feedback was provided to the user stating if the iteration had converged.

Before and after gradient predistortion was applied, HP-excited 2D-UTE was performed within the tibia at 6 echo times, te = 0.15, 0.25, 0.4, 0.6, 1.0 and 2.0 ms, with a repetition time, tr = 10 ms. Three phantoms were included next to the leg, containing T2s of ≈ 10 ms (one small diameter tube) and ≈ 50 ms (two larger diameter tubes), within a FOV of 230 mm and a 5 mm slice thickness.

Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows the nominal ideal gradient waveform and the predistorted gradient waveform optimized to minimize the overall gradient error, which was achieved after 4 iterations. Gradient errors (i.e. the difference between the ideal and measured gradient waveforms) are also shown in Figure 1 when the ideal and predistorted waveforms were applied. The normalized root squared gradient error improved from 0.0413 to 0.0105.

Cropped 2D-UTE images are given in Figure 2 (te = 0.15 ms) when the nominal and predistorted gradient waveforms were applied for half-pulse slice selection. In the nominal image, errors in the alignment of the two half-pulses allowed out-of-slice signal to be present. This resulted in an apparent smearing of the image, which is related to the orientation of the leg in the regions outside the desired slice thickness.

Plots of signal vs. te are also shown in Figure 2 for an ROI in the cortical bone (yellow), as well as in water phantoms with T2 = 10 (blue) and 50 ms (red). For signals acquired with the nominal gradient waveform, increases in image intensity with echo time were due to transient gradient errors, which cause out-of-slice signals to come in and out of phase. In the images acquired with predistorted gradient waveforms, the water phantoms decay at a rate similar to their intrinsic T2 relaxation time-constants. Further, in the cortical bone, the signal exhibits a bi-exponential T2, where ultrashort and longer T2 components arise from distinct bound- and pore-water compartments known to exist in cortical bone2,3.

Conclusion

This implementation of automatic gradient predistortion allows HP-excited 2D-UTE to be reliably used for the fast evaluation of ultrashort-T2 signals. In general, automatic gradient waveform predistortion is a useful tool to eliminate image artifacts related to gradient waveform errors.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

1. Pauly J, Conolly S, Nishimura D, et al. A Slice Selective Excitation for Very Short T2 Species. Proc ISMRM 1989;28

2. Horch RA, Nyman JS, Gochberg DF, et al. Characterization of 1H NMR signal in human cortical bone for magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Res Med 2010;64(3):680-687

3. Du J, Diaz E, Carl M, et al. Ultrashort echo time imaging with bicomponent analysis. Magn Res Med 2012;67(3):645-649

4. Lu A, Daniel BL, Pauly JM, et al. Improved slice selection for R2* mapping during cryoablation with eddy current compensation. J Magn Res Imag 2008;28(1):190-198

5. Fabich HT, Benning M, Sederman AJ, et al. Ultrashort echo time (UTE) imaging using gradient pre-equalization and compressed sensing. J Magn Res 2014;245:116-124

6. Harkins KD, Does MD, Grissom WA. Iterative method for predistortion of MRI gradient waveforms. IEEE–TMI 2014;33(8):1641-1647

7. Duyn JH, Yang Y, Frank JA, et al. Simple correction method for k-space trajectory deviations in MRI. J Magn Res 1997;132(1):150-153

Figures

Figure 1: The nominal and predistorted gradient waveforms (left) along with the measured gradient errors when applying these waveforms (right).

Figure 2: UTE images (te=0.15 ms) and signal vs. te when predistorted and nominal gradient waveforms were used for slice selection. Automatic predistortion corrects for out-of-slice signal contamination present in the nominal image, which affects short T2 signal characterization.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
4289