Marcel Gratz1,2, Marc Schlamann3,4, Sophia Göricke4, Stefan Maderwald2, and Harald H. Quick1,2
1High Field and Hybrid MR Imaging, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany, 2Erwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany, 3Neuroradiology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg GmbH, Giessen, Germany, 4Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
Synopsis
Highly
undersampled contrast-enhanced intracranial MR angiography (SPARSE
CE-MRA) was evaluated regarding the vascular visibility and image
quality in a clinical setting on a 3T MRI system for 23 patients with
various pathologies. The overall performance is comparable to TOF MR
angiography, yet with much shorter acquisition times and a
high-resolution whole-head coverage in both arterial and venous
phase. However, a strong dependence of the obtained MRA quality on
the bolus timing of the contrast agent was found and needs to be
properly addressed by the operators to minimize the arterio-venous
overlap in the imagery for best diagnostic quality.Purpose
Highly
undersampled contrast-enhanced MR angiography (SPARSE CE-MRA)
1 with high spatial resolution and full head coverage was set up and
evaluated in a clinical environment for different intracranial
pathologies. Thus, potentials and pitfalls were identified and
compared to the performance of conventional time-of-flight (TOF) MR
angiography.
Methods
Twenty-three
patients, 19 of them with intracranial pathologies, underwent a
routine MR Head protocol at 3T (MAGNETOM Skyra, Siemens Healthcare,
Erlangen, Germany) including the application of contrast agents,
which was extended by three identical SPARSE MRA runs (at the
pre-contrast, arterial and venous post-contrast phase). These
prototype sequence provide high spatial resolution (0.7mm³
isotropic) and large spatial coverage (field of view:
265 x 232 x 214 mm³) while keeping the
acquisition times at a few seconds only (TA = 10s) using an overall
acceleration factor of 30 together with a spiral phyllotaxis sampling
pattern) as needed particularly for the acquisition of a pure
arterial phase. Although an inline reconstruction based on a
redundant Haar wavelet based L1-regularized iterative SENSE algorithm
with modified FISTA algorithm was available
1, the obtained 3D raw
datasets were iteratively reconstructed by a custom-written batch
script after working hours due to their rather long reconstruction
times of about 6 to 8 minutes per dataset for the current setup.
Subsequently, all 23 patient datasets were presented to two
radiologists and evaluated using 24 parameters and vascular segments
on a 5-point ordinary scale (5 – very good vascular
visibility/quality, 1 – insufficient visibility/quality). Where
available, these results obtained from the SPARSE MRA sequences were
compared to the performance of intracranial TOF MR angiography
(TA=5 min, field of view: 128 x 117 x 68 mm³,
spatial resolution 0.3x0.3x0.5mm³) using identical rating criteria.
Results
The
mean overall rating of the SPARSE MRA across all patients was found
to be 3.50 ± 1.07. The average rating across different
features was 3.56 ± 0.95. Here, segments such as the
carotid bifurcation (4.36 ± 0.75) and AVM nidus
(4.33 ± 0.52), if applicable, were found to be represented
best whereas worst ratings were observed for the ophthalmic artery
(2.09 ± 0.81) and superior cerebellar artery
(1.87 ± 0.91). Interobserver reliability as provided by
Cohen's κ
was 0.54, while for 65.1% of the ratings there was full agreement and
34.7% only differed by one point. A
significant dependence of the image quality and vascular visibility
on the bolus timing was observed. Thus, a separated analysis of the
patients with correct and inaccurate timing, respectively, revealed
average image quality scores of 3.76 and 3.15 across patients. These
rating differences were mainly caused by the difference of the
depiction of the arteries in the image data. The average performance
of intracranial TOF was rated slightly better than for SPARSE MRA
(3.84 ± 0.87 across all patients, 3.54 ± 0.62
across all features).
Discussion
and Conclusion
SPARSE
MRA sequences in this application provide a very fast overview of the
whole cranial vascular system with high spatial resolutions, which
proves to be particularly useful for patients with vascular
pathologies such as stenosis, fistulae and arterio-venous
malformations (AVMs) and in restless patients. Although, intracranial
TOF was found to have a slightly better performance, acquisition
times of TOF protocols are much longer compared to SPARSE MRA.
Moreover the used TOF protocol provides only images of the arterial
phase or (in the presence of contrast agents) a mixed arterio-venous
phase. Furthermore, within clinically acceptable scan times only a
section of the intracranial structure can be acquired with TOF
whereas SPARSE MRA provides whole-head coverage. Thus, SPARSE MRA is
able to reveal segments such as
A.lingualis that are commonly not
depicted in TOF datasets. However, special care must be taken for
contrast bolus timing to obtain well separated arterial and venous
phases, respectively, with a minimum of overlap for best diagnostic
image quality.
Acknowledgements
The
authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the support of Michaela
Schmidt and Dr. Aurelien Stalder, both Siemens Healthcare GmbH,
Erlangen, Germany in providing and implementing the sparse MRA
sequence and for providing further support and valuable feedback
during data acquisition.References
1. Stalder
et al., Magn Reson Med (2014)