Projected Fast Iterative Soft-thresholding Algorithm for Tight Frames in Compressed Sensing Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Xiaobo Qu1, Yunsong Liu1, Zhifan Zhan1, Jian-Feng Cai2, Di Guo3, and Zhong Chen1

1Department of Electronic Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China, People's Republic of, 2Department of Mathematics, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong, 3School of Computer and Information Engineering, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen, China, People's Republic of

Synopsis

Redundant sparse representations can significantly improve the MRI image reconstruction with sparsity constraint. An appropriate sparse model is very important to improve image quality even with the same sparsifying transforms and undersampled data. We propose a new fast, stable, compatible and simple iterative thresholding algorithm to solve the analysis sparse models that can obviously improve the image reconstruction for tight-frame-based sparsifying transform in compressed sensing MRI. We theoretically prove the convergence of the proposed projected fast iterative soft-thresholding algorithm (pFISTA). Numerical results show that pFISTA achieves better reconstruction than state-of-art FISTA for synthesis sparse model and more stable and compatible than the state-of-art SFISTA.

Purpose

Compressed sensing has shown great potentials in accelerating magnetic resonance imaging1. Fast image reconstruction and high image quality are two main issues faced by this technology. It has been shown that, redundant image representations, e.g. tight frames, can significantly improve the image quality2,3. But how to efficiently solve the reconstruction problem with these redundant representation systems is still challenging. In this paper, we propose a projected iterative soft-thresholding algorithm (pISTA) and its acceleration (pFISTA) for MRI image reconstruction via sparse representation under tight frames. We theoretically prove that pISTA converges to a minimizer of an objective function with a balanced tight frame sparsity4,5. Our algorithms use much less memory than typical algorithms for both the synthesis and analysis sparse models. Besides, compared with the synthesis sparse model, the proposed algorithms achieve better image quality. Also, both pISTA and pFISTA have only one parameter to tune and the numerical solution is stable to it in terms of image reconstruction errors, which allows easily setting in many fast MRI applications.

Methods

With the canonical dual frame, we rewrite the analysis model to be a constrained synthesis-like one. This inspires us to apply algorithms that are usually fit for synthesis models, e.g. iterative soft-thresholding algorithm (ISTA), to analysis models. In order to keep the simplicity of ISTA, we propose to replace a constrained proximal map by an unconstrained proximal map plus the orthogonal projection onto the constrained subspace. Therefore, the proposed algorithm is called projected ISTA (pISTA). Furthermore, the same accelerating strategy as FISTA6 is introduced, resulting in the projected FISTA (pFISTA).

We proved that the the proposed algorithm converges to a minimizer of an objective function with a balanced tight frame sparsity. The derivation of pFISTA is shown in Fig.1.

Our pFISTA works in image domain, and there is no need to store any tight frame coefficients. Therefore, the pFISTA can significantly reduce memory consumption for highly redundant systems. Besides, this algorithm allows compatible programming for various tight-frames with different redundancy since one only need the forward and inverse tight-frame and thresholding.

Results

Fig.2 shows the empirical convergence of FISTA6, SFISTA7 and pFISTA using shift-invariant discrete wavelet transform (SIDWT). It implies that both pFISTA and SFISTA, solving approximately analysis sparse models, produce much lower reconstruction error, than the original FISTA, solving synthesis sparse model. Advantage of analysis sparse model is also found on the reconstructed images as shown in Fig. 4, where wavelet basis-like artifacts are observed for FISTA method. Fig.3 shows that our pFISTA leads to similar reconstruction errors with only one free parameter $gama$ while the state-of-the-art SFISTA is sensitive to an free parameter $miu$.

Conclusions

We propose a projected iterative soft-threshoding algorithm (pISTA) and futher accelerate it with the same strategy as FISTA, namely pFISTA, to solve sparse image reconstruction from undersampled measurements in fast magnetic resonance imaging. We theoretically prove that the proposed algorithm converges to the balanced sparse model. Numerical results show that pFISTA achieves better reconstruction than FISTA for synthesis sparse model and converges faster or comparable to the state-of-art SFISTA7 for analysis sparse model. One main advantage of pFISTA is that reconstructed errors are stable to the step size, thus allowing widely usage for different tight frames in magnetic resonance image reconstructions. In the future, the convergence of pFISTA for general frames/dictionaries will be analyzed and this algorithm will be used for other advanced adaptively sparse representations in compressed sensing MRI. More information can be found at the full-length paper shared at arXiv 8.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the NNSF of China (61571380, 61201045, 61302174 and 11375147), Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China (2015J01346), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (20720150109, 2013SH002) and NSF DMS-1418737. Correspondence should be addressed to Prof. Xiaobo Qu with Email: quxiaobo@xmu.edu.cn.

References

1. Lustig M, Donoho D, Pauly JM. Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2007; 58(6): 1182-1195.

2. Qu X, Guo D, Ning B, et al. Undersampled MRI reconstruction with patch-based directional wavelets. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2012; 30(7): 964-977.

3. Qu, X, Hou Y, Lam F, et al. Magnetic resonance image reconstruction from undersampled measurements using a patch-based nonlocal operator. Medical Image Analysis. 2014; 18(6): 843-856.

4. Cai JF, Chan RH, Shen Z. A framelet-based image inpainting algorithm. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis. 2008; 24(2):131-149.

5. Liu Y, Cai JF, Zhan Z, et al. Balanced sparse model for tight frames in compressed sensing magnetic resonance imaging. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10(4): e0119584.

6. Beck A, Teboulle M. A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems. SIAM Journal on Imaging Science. 2009; 2(1): 183-202.

7. Tan Z, Eldar YC, Beck A, et al. Smoothing and decomposition for analysis sparse recovery. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. 2014; 62(7): 1762-1774.

8. Liu Y, Zhan Z, Cai JF,et al. Projected iterative soft-thresholding algorithm for tight frames in compressed sensing magnetic resonance imaging. arXiv: 1504.07786.

Figures

The derivation of pFISTA.

Empirical convergence of FISTA6, SFISTA7 and pFISTA using SIDWT.

Empirical convergence of pFISTA with different step sizes γ using SIDWT.

Reconstructed images using three methods. (a) is a zoom-in region of the ground truth image. (b)-(d) are zoom-in regions of reconstructed images of FISTA6, SFISTA7 and pFISTA. (f)-(h) are 10x scaled difference images of (b)-(d) to (a).



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
4205