MRI acceleration using correlation imaging with tissue boundary sparsity
Yu Y. Li1

1Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, United States

Synopsis

In MRI data acquisition, gradient encoding introduces a non-uniform distribution of tissue contrast and boundary information in k-space. As a result, data correlation increases with tissue boundary sparsity from the center to the outer k-space. The presented work investigates a new approach to accelerating MRI by taking advantage of non-uniform k-space data correlation. In this approach, k-space data are collected and reconstructed in a region-by-region fashion using a previously developed high-speed imaging framework, "correlation imaging"1,2. It is demonstrated that region-by-region correlation imaging can introduce a gain over parallel imaging in imaging acceleration by utilizing more information.

Purpose

A medical image consists of tissue contrast and boundary information. Due to frequency differences, they can be separated by gradient encoding in MRI data acquisition. Typically the contrast information is concentrated within the center k-space while the outer k-space data provide most of the boundary information. In the presented work, we develop an approach to accelerating MRI by taking advantage of this non-uniform k-space distribution of tissue contrast and boundary information. A high-speed imaging framework developed in our previous works1,2, "correlation imaging", is used to reconstruct images from undersampled data. By converting image reconstruction into the estimate of correlation functions between parallel data acquisition channels, correlation imaging can benefit from both coil sensitivity encoding and tissue boundary sparsity. Our experiments demonstrate that this approach can provide an imaging speed gain over parallel imaging by utilizing more information in image reconstruction.

Methods

A correlation function between two channels i and j is defined as:

cij(k) = sum{ [di(k'+k)] conjugate[dj(k')] }over k' (1),

where {di(k), i=1,2,…,N} represents N-channel fully sampled k-space data. In correlation imaging1,2, if these correlation functions were estimated, they can be used to form a set of linear equations for resolving a set of k-space filters. Image reconstruction is given by the linear convolution of the resolved filters and the collected data. It should be noted that Equation 1 quantifies the correlation of k-space data samples in a distance of k. Typically, the correlation functions from a set of more correlated k-space data are more dominated by a spread-out pattern around the k-space center (i.e., higher correlation values between samples in a larger distance). It is thus possible to predict the performance of correlation imaging based on the k-space pattern of correlation functions.

In a medical image, tissue boundary is sparser than tissue contrast. As a result, image content sparsity increases with tissue boundary information from center to outer k-space. Since image sparsity may enhance data correlation, a more dominant spread-out pattern can be seen in the correlation functions calculated from an outer k-space region than those from a center k-space region (Figure 1). This indicates that outer k-space data are more correlated and correlation imaging performs better in outer k-space than in center k-space. For this reason, we can undersample outer k-space more than center k-space for improved imaging acceleration. As illustrated by Figure 2(a), the presented work divides the whole k-space into multiple local regions. Each region is undersampled uniformly and the undersampling factors increase from the center to the outer k-space regions. Image reconstruction is performed iteratively in a region-by-region fashion and every region is reconstructed using a different set of correlation functions (Figure 2b).

To validate the approach, a set of 3D brain imaging data was collected using a T1-weighted ultrafast gradient echo sequence (FOV 240x240x240 mm, matrix 240x240x154, TR/TE 9.3/4.6 ms, flip angle 8°, data acquisition time ~6 minutes) on a 3T clinical MRI scanner. The coil array for data collection had 8 elements uniformly positioned around the anatomy. The fully-sampled data were manually undersampled to simulate imaging acceleration. SENSE, GRAPPA, and SPIRiT were used as reference approaches.

Results

Figure 2 shows the reconstruction results for a center sagittal slice with a net imaging acceleration factor of 10 (corresponding to a data acquisition time of ~30 seconds). Compared with SENSE, GRAPPA, and SPIRiT, correlation imaging with non-uniform undersampling gives better image quality and smaller errors. This improvement is found in all the images generated from the collected 3D data.

Discussion

Parallel imaging acceleration is dependent on coil sensitivity encoding and limited by the channel number. Using an 8-channel coil with an acceleration factor of 10, our experiments were run beyond the parallel imaging limit. For this reason, parallel imaging performs poorly. In contrast, the presented approach performs well. This gain should be attributed to the following two factors. First, region-by-region reconstruction can utilize both coil sensitivity encoding and the priori information about medical images, i.e., the k-space variation of data correlation associated with tissue boundary sparsity. Second, as shown in Figure 2(right), the reconstructed data are iteratively used as a constraint on the estimation of correlation functions for the reconstruction of each k-space region in correlation imaging. This additional constraint can translate more information about data correlation into image reconstruction for improved correlation imaging.

Conclusion

We have developed a new correlation imaging approach to utilizing tissue boundary sparsity to accelerate MRI. It is demonstrated that this approach can provide a gain in imaging acceleration over parallel imaging.

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by NIH/NICHD R21HD071540.

References

1. Li, Y et al., MRM 2012; 68:2005-2017.

2. Li, Y et al., MRM 2014; Doi: 10.1002/mrm. 25546.

Figures

Figure 1. Tissue boundary sparsity introduces non-uniform data correlation in k-space. (a) A brain image example. (b) k-space is divided into multiple regions. (c) With the increase of image-space sparsity from the center to the outer k-space (top), the correlation function shows a more and more dominant spread-out pattern (bottom).

Figure 2. Non-uniform undersampling (left) and region-by-region image reconstruction (right). Correlation imaging is performed region-by-region from the center to the outer k-space. In each region, correlation functions are estimated only for those areas to be reconstructed, e.g., the grey zones in region 1 (left).

Figure 3. In reference to the real image (leftmost), correlation imaging (rightmost) gives better performance than SENSE, GRAPPA, and SPIRiT with the same net acceleration factor (10 fold) in a 3D brain imaging experiment with an 8-channel coil array.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
4204