Synopsis
This work is to provide perfusion parameters such as
cerebral blood volume at high spatial resolution, for detailed delineation of
tumor borders and to guide stereotactic surgery biopsies in locating the
most aggressive tumorous tissue. This is achieved with an k-t-undersampled EPI
acquisition and PEAK-GRAPPA reconstruction. Additionally, an advanced iterative
reconstruction method is developed incorporating partial separability constraint into parallel imaging with SPIRiT kernels (PS-SPIRiT). Two half-dose first-pass perfusion acquisitions in tumor
patients allow direct comparison of the standard clinical protocol with the
proposed acquisition and reconstruction schemes. Purpose
For histological estimation of brain tumors, it is essential to identify
the most aggressive tumor areas for sampling1. Whereas high
resolution anatomical MR images are available, assessment of functional
indicators like cerebral blood volume (CBV) is usually restricted to low
spatial resolutions due to a trade-off between temporal resolution
and quantification fidelity. This work aims at performing cerebral perfusion
acquisitions with high spatial resolution without sacrificing temporal
resolution. This is achieved using PEAK-EPI2,3 and by employing
a new reconstruction technique: PS-SPIRiT.
Methods
Dynamic-susceptibility-weighted imaging of cerebral perfusion, incorporating
peripherarily injected gadoteridol tracer, is performed based on k-t-undersampled EPI
acquisitions with inplace Nyquist-sampled ACS data and PEAK-GRAPPA4
reconstruction. Further, a new reconstruction method that integrates temporal basis functions
(derived based on the partial separability5,6 of (k,t)-space data) with parallel imaging (employing SPIRiT7,8) is
evaluated.
Two repeated half-dose first-pass bolus perfusion
acquisitions were performed (acquisition parameters in Fig.$$$~$$$1) in six patients
(only two shown) with different diagnostic backgrounds on a$$$~$$$3T clinical scanner
(Tim TRIO, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany): 1.$$$~$$$a standard clinical EPI protocol and
2.$$$~$$$PEAK-EPI at reduction factor $$$R=5$$$ with our in-house developed (PEAK-)EPI sequence2,3.
With PEAK-EPI, a nominal spatial resolution of 1.4$$$~$$$mm was achieved, as
opposed to a nominal resolution of 1.8$$$~$$$mm in the standard measurement.
The further proposed PS-SPIRiT reconstruction was achieved based on solving
the following inverse problem for the unknown image weights $$$U\in\mathbb{C}^{N_{x}N_{y}\times{L}}$$$ and given the sampled data $$$d\in\mathbb{C}^{N_x(N_y/R)N_tN_c}$$$:
$$\arg\min_{U\in\mathbb{C}^{N_{x}N_{y}\times{L}}}~||~d-(\mathbf{\Omega}\circ\mathbf{F})(U\hat{V})~||~^2_2+||~\mathbf{\hat{G}}(U\hat{V})-U\hat{V}~||^2_2+R(U),$$
where $$$\hat{V}\in\mathbb{C}^{L\times{N_t}}$$$ and $$$\mathbf{\hat{G}}$$$ refer to the a priori determined temporal basis functions and SPIRiT-reconstruction operator, both estimated from the Nyquist-sampled ACS data at full temporal resolution. The operators $$$\mathbf{F}$$$ and $$$\mathbf{\Omega}$$$ denote the coil-wise Fourier transform and undersampling mask, respectively. The subspace dimension was restricted to $$$L=8$$$ and $$$R(U)$$$
was chosen to promote spatial-spectral sparsity,$$$~$$$e.g.9.
The standard EPI was additionally reconstructed offline with POCS10 to account for Partial-Fourier-sampling. CBV maps were derived off-line and re-scaled to $$$\left[0,1\right]$$$ for depiction with a common threshold in case of PEAK-, PS-SPIRiT- and POCS-EPI. The first two were further compared in terms of tSNR, average temporal evolution and correlation of relative CBV values.
Results
Figure$$$~$$$2
and$$$~$$$3 demonstrate the improved spatial resolution for PEAK-EPI
acquisitions with PEAK-GRAPPA and PS-SPIRiT reconstruction. Fine capillary
structures - whose composition yield a marker of tumor growth - and prominent
veins draining into the left ventricle are much better distinguishable in the
proposed acquisition as compared to the standard protocol (Fig.$$$~$$$2). Due
to the better spatial resolution in the PEAK-EPI acquisition, the small lesion
in the cingulate cortex as shown in Fig.$$$~$$$3 is easier to distinguish from
the vessels of the anterior interhemispheric fissure than in standard EPI. The
high resolution CBV maps further exhibit finer gradations of CBV within the tumorous
area.
As further demonstrated in Fig.$$$~$$$3, the PEAK-EPI measurement is less
affected by susceptibility artifacts due to the reduced readout length (white oval).
Comparison between PEAK- and PS-SPIRiT-EPI indicate a slightly better tSNR for
the latter (Fig.$$$~$$$4) and correlated CBV values with higher -$$$~$$$yet
relative$$$~$$$- values for PS-SPIRiT-EPI (Fig.$$$~$$$5). However, only one
case is regarded in the comparison.
Discussion
The achieved echo train length reduction and faster k-space traversal
mitigates distortion and susceptibility artifacts, while facilitating an
increase of spatial resolution without sacrificing temporal resolution. In the
Cartesian acquisition scenarios used in our method, this was achieved in both,
PEAK-EPI with PEAK-GRAPPA reconstruction as well as with the new PS-SPIRiT
reconstruction. High resolution information is substantial in angiogenesis
assessment.
When comparing
relative CBV values emulating equivalent windowing, the additional information
provided by the high resolution CBV maps is clearly visible.
The flexible PS approach allows for various undersampling patterns, which were not assessed
here. Next steps therefore comprise further analysis of the optimal parameters
for PS-SPIRiT and to explore more complex undersampling scenarios, potentially
enabling higher reduction factors. Currently, a static SPIRiT-kernel was employed which will be extended to dynamic SPIRiT-kernels in further experiments.
The presented scenarios can be readily applied in multi-echo acquisitions,
e.g.11, where either the higher reduction factor can be used to
increase the echo train length or SNR can be improved with the same reduction
due to PEAK-GRAPPA12. Our methods can be readily combined with
multiband-EPI13,14,15 to further increase temporal resolution
of the measurement.
Conclusion
The high resolution CBV maps obtained with PEAK-EPI acquisition and the two
presented reconstructions facilitate detailed delineation of tumor borders and
provide a more precise location of the most aggressive areas in tumorous
tissue. Therefore, PEAK-EPI provides high resolution functional information
ready to assist more precise grading of tumors in stereotactic surgery
biopsies.
Acknowledgements
We thank Ralf
Deichmann for sharing his FLASH-EPI sequence which served as a basis for the
sequence development and the German Research Foundation (DFG), grant
JU2876/4-1.References
1. Covarrubias, at al. Dynamic magnetic resonance perfusion imaging of brain tumors. The Oncologist, 2004;9(5), 528-537.
2. Ramb R, et al. k-t-EPI: k-t-undersampled EPI acquisition and reconstruction in cerebral perfusion. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Milano, Italy, 2014; p. 4370.
3. Ramb R, et al. PEAK-EPI: Feasibility and benefits of k-t-undersampled EPI acquisition and PEAK-GRAPPA reconstruction in fMRI. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Toronto, Canada, 2015; p. 3920.
4. Jung B, et al. Parallel MRI with extended and averaged GRAPPA kernels (PEAK-GRAPPA): Optimized spatiotemporal dynamic imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2008;28(5):1226–1232.
5. Liang ZP. Spatiotemporal imaging with partially separable functions. In Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro. ISBI 2007. 4th IEEE International Symposium on, 2007;988–991.
6. Haldar J, Liang ZP. Spatiotemporal imaging with partially separable functions: A matrix recovery approach. In Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro. IEEE International Symposium on, 2010; 716–719.
7. Lustig M, Pauly JM. SPIRiT: Iterative self-consistent
parallel imaging reconstruction from arbitrary k-space. Magn Reson in Med, 2010;64(2), 457-471.
8. Murphy M, et al. Fast-SPIRiT compressed sensing parallel imaging MRI:
scalable parallel implementation and clinically feasible runtime. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on, 2012;31(6), 1250-1262.
9. Zhao B, Haldar JP,
Christodoulou AG, Liang ZP. Image reconstruction
from highly undersampled $$$(\mathbf{k},t)$$$-space data with joint partial separability and
sparsity constraints. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on, 2012;31(9), 1809-1820.
10. Haacke EM, Liang ZP, Boada FE. Image reconstruction using POCS, model
constraints, and linear prediction theory for the removal of phase,
motion, and Gibbs artifacts in magnetic resonance and ultrasound
imaging. Optical Engineering, 1990;29(5), 555-566.
11. Schmiedeskamp H,
Straka M, Bammer R. Compensation of slice profile
mismatch in combined spin-and gradient-echo echo-planar imaging pulse
sequences. Magn Reson Med, 2012;67(2), 378-388.
12. Ramb R, et al. A g-factor metric for k-t-GRAPPA-and PEAK-GRAPPA-based parallel
imaging. Magn Reson Med, 2014;74, 125–135.
13. Larkman DJ, et al. Use of multicoil arrays for separation of
signal from multiple slices simultaneously excited. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2001;13: 313–317.
14. Moeller S, et al. Multiband multislice GE-EPI at 7 tesla, with
16-fold acceleration using partial parallel imaging with application to
high spatial and temporal whole-brain fMRI. Magn Reson Med,
2010;63: 1144–1153.
15. Setsompop K, et al. Blipped-controlled aliasing in parallel imaging for
simultaneous multislice echo planar imaging with reduced g-factor penalty. Magn Reson Med, 2012;67: 1210–1224.