Francesca Branzoli1,2, Anna Luisa Di Stefano2,3,4, Malgorzata Marjanska5, Romain Valabregue1,2, Stephane Lehericy1,2, and Marc Sanson2,3
1Brain and Spine Institute (ICM), Center for Neuroimaging Research (CENIR), F-75013, Paris, France, 2INSERM U1127/CNRS UMR7225, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, ICM, F-75013, Paris, France, 3AP-HP, GH Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service de Neurologie 2, F-75013, Paris, France, 4Division of Neurology, Foch Hospital, Paris, France, 5Center for Magnetic Resonance Research and Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
Synopsis
Reliable quantification by magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG) has important
implications in diagnosis of IDH mutation, prognosis, as well as assessment of
the efficacy of anti-IDH targeted therapies. In this study, we employed two approaches for 2HG
detection previously described, e.g., difference spectroscopy and optimized for
2HG detection conventional spectroscopy, in order to assess for the first time the
specificity and sensitivity of the two methods, and to relate these results to the natural history and the neuroradiological status of patients with glioma. Purpose
The overproduction of the oncometabolite
2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG) in IDH mutated gliomas [1, 2] can be detected non-invasively
by magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) [3-5]. Reliable quantification of 2HG
has important implications in diagnosis of IDH mutation, prognosis, as well as
assessment of the efficacy of anti-IDH targeted therapies. 2HG detection is
very challenging and advanced methods for robust detection of this metabolite
are not available in clinical settings. In this study, we employed two
approaches for 2HG detection previously described, e.g., difference
spectroscopy and optimized for 2HG detection conventional spectroscopy [3, 4],
on a pre-operative cohort of patients, and on a post-operative cohort of
patients previously treated with radio-and/or chemotherapy. The aim was to
assess for the first time the specificity and sensitivity of the two methods,
and to relate the results to the natural history and
neuroradiological status of patients with glioma.
Materials
and Methods
MRI/MRS
protocol: Acquisitions
were performed using a 3-T whole-body system (MAGNETOM Verio, Siemens,
Erlangen, Germany) equipped with a 32-channel receive-only head coil. The
protocol included T2-w FLAIR and T1-w sequences for voxel
placement. MRS data were acquired using two sequences optimized for 2HG
detection: 1) a single-voxel MEGA-PRESS [6] sequence (TR=2s, TE=68ms, 128
averages, scan time=9 min) with editing pulses applied at 1.9 and 7.5 ppm,
for the edited and non-edited condition respectively, which allows to measure
the 2HG signal at 4.05 ppm; 2) a single-voxel PRESS sequence (TR=2.5s, TE=97ms,
TE1=32ms, TE2=65ms, 128 averages, scan time = 6 min), optimized to detect the 2HG
signal at 2.25 ppm [3]. Water suppression was performed using VAPOR and outer
volume suppression techniques [7]. Frequency and phase corrections were
performed on single scans using the total choline signal at 3.2 ppm. Typical VOI
size was 2x2x2 cm3 (Fig. 1c, f).
VOI size was adapted to tumor size in order to minimize partial volume effects,
keeping a minimum size of 6 cm3. Spectral quantification was performed
using LCModel. The Cramer Rao lower bounds (CRLB) threshold for reliable 2HG
detection was set to 20%.
Patient
population: Thirty patients were included
in the study: six subjects before surgery with suspected brain glioma
(pre-operative cohort), and twenty-four patients who had surgery and radiotherapy
or chemotherapy, and were affected by an IDH1 mutated glioma (post-operative
cohort). In the post-operative cohort, five patients were affected by grade II,
fourteen by grade III and five by grade IV IDH mutated glioma. In the same
cohort, eleven patients were under radiotherapy or chemotherapy. IDH status was
assessed for all patients combining detection of expression of IDH1-R132H
mutant by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Sanger sequencing for IDH1 and IDH2
gene mutations.
Results
In the
pre-operative cohort, 2HG was detected in five out of six patients using
MEGA-PRESS, while CRLB was < 20% only for two patients from PRESS data (examples of spectra in
Fig. 1).
Histopathological diagnosis after surgery confirmed the presence of IDH mutated
gliomas in the five patients with detectable 2HG levels (two grade II and three
grade III gliomas), while it revealed an IDH wild-type ganglioglioma in the
patient with no 2HG signature [sensitivity 100% (0.4 to
1.0, 95% CI); specificity 100% (0.02 to 1.0, 95% CI)] (
Table 1).
In the
post-operative cohort, 2HG was detected in seven out of twenty-four patients using
MEGA-PRESS (sensitivity 29%), and only in three patients using PRESS (sensitivity
12%, data not shown). Detection of 2HG was not associated with grade (p=0.4), histological
diagnosis (p=0.5), or the fact that patients
were out of treatment at the moment of MRS examination (p=0.2).
Discussion
and Conclusion
2HG spectroscopy is a promising technique for the
diagnostic set-up and follow-up of glioma patients, which remains underused
because of technical challenges. Preliminary results strongly suggest that
difference spectroscopy (MEGA-PRESS) can provide high sensitivity/specificity
for prediction of IDH mutation status before surgery, in contrast to optimized
for 2HG detection conventional spectroscopy (PRESS). Fitting of conventional
spectra can provide false-negative readouts due to spectral overlap of 2HG with
chemically similar metabolites, such as glutamate, glutamine and GABA. The detection
of 2HG is crucial for monitoring the response to treatments targeting IDH
mutation. Although difference spectroscopy provides much higher sensitivity
with respect to conventional MRS, in the post-operative cohort it was not
possible to measure reliably 2HG concentration in 70% of patients. Some of the
factors which can impact the sensitivity of the measurement are the residual
tumor volume, 2HG concentration, cellular density, treatment, evolution of the
disease, MRI phenotype, tumor localization, type of mutation and molecular
pattern. All these elements together will be evaluated to provide a
general guideline for 2HG detection after surgery.
Acknowledgements
Grant ‘Institut des
neurosciences translationnelle - ANR-10-IAIHU-06', and 'Infrastructure d’avenir
en Biologie Santé - ANR-11-INBS-0006’; P41
EB015894, and P30 NS076408 (MM).References
[1] Parsons DW et al. Science 321:1807-1812 (2008). [2]
Dang L et al. Nature. 462:739-744 (2009). [3] Choi C et al, Nature Med
18:624-29 (2012); [4] Andronesi OC et al, Science Transl Med 4:116ra4 (2012);
[5] Pope WB et al, J Neuroonc. 107:197-205 (2012); [6] Mescher M et
al. J Magn Reson, 123:226–229 (1996).
[7] Tkac I et al, Magn Reson Med, 41:649–656 (1999).