Axial diffusivity is more sensitive in detecting white matter injury in adult survivors of childhood brain tumors: a DTI study using tract-based spatial statistics
Silun Wang1, Jianming Ni2, Liya Wang1, Tricia King3, and Hui Mao1

1Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, EMORY UNIVERSITY, ATLANTA, GA, United States, 2Medical Imaging Center, The Second Hospital of Wuxi, WuXi, China, People's Republic of, 3Department of Psychology & Neuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States

Synopsis

White matter injury is considered as a major contributory factor of treatment-induced neurotoxicity prevalent among childhood cancer survivors. DTI study with TBSS analysis shows significantly lower FA, λ// and higher λ in survivors compared to controls. DTI indices show unmatched white matter regions with significant difference. In comparison of FA, λ// may be more sensitive to detect white matter injury. Combining analysis of DTI indices provide additional information to explore white matter injury induced by radiotherapy or chemotherapy.

PURPOSE

White matter (WM) injury is considered as a major contributory factor of treatment-induced neurotoxicity prevalent among childhood cancer survivors who have undergone whole brain irradiation or chemotherapy (1). The identification of imaging markers of WM neurotoxicity associated to the brain tumor and its treatment is necessary to modify treatment strategies that may prevent or minimize brain injury. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) can be used to characterize microstructural changes in WM and the underlying pathology ; for example, decreased λ// reflects axonal degeneration (2) whereas increased radial diffusivity (λ) was related to myelin damage. In this study, we aim to investigate the DTI measurement of white matter injury of childhood cancer survivors using Tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) (3,4) analysis.

METHODS

Participants: Twenty-seven adult survivors of childhood brain tumors and twenty-six demographically matched healthy controls (mean age: 22.7 ± 4.5 vs. 22.9 ± 4.3, p>0.05) were enrolled in the study. Among the survivor group, the average age of diagnosis was 9.0±5.1 years old, and the average time between diagnosis and testing was 13.7±5.4 years. Survivors had tumors located in posterior fossa (n=21), temporal lobe (n=2), occipital lobe (n=1), hypothalamus (n=1) or third ventricle (n=2). Fourteen survivors were received radiotherapy (RT) with median radiation dose of 5400 cGY (range: 5040–5940 cGy). The control group (n = 27) consisted of age- and gender-matched neurotypical-control participants. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board. MRI Data Acquisition: Anatomical MRI and DTI were performed on all participants using a 3T MRI scanner (Siemens Tim/Trio) and a 12-channel head coil. T1 weighted images (T1WI) were performed with TR/TE = 2250/3.98 ms, degree of flip angle = 9, inversion time = 850 ms, slice thickness = 1 mm, FOV =256 mm2 and matrix of 256× 256. DTI were acquired by using single-shot spin EPI sequence with 30 gradient directions. The images were acquired with TR/TE = 7700/90 ms, flip angle = 90°, slice thickness=2mm, FOV=256mm2, b-values =0 or 1,000 s/mm2. Image Data Processing and Analysis: DTI were processed and analyzed using the FMRIB Software (FSL, 5.0.1, Oxford University, UK). TBSS was used to find differences in FA, axial diffusivity (λ//) and radial diffusivity (λ) between survivors and controls throughout the white matter. A statistical threshold-free cluster enhancement (TFCE) analysis was implemented from randomize with a cluster P < 0.05 (with Family Wise Error Correction). The white matter tracts were smoothed with a 3 mm Gaussian kernel, while maintaining the maximum statistic values and limiting the extent of the spread to voxels in the white matter (defined as FA > 0.2). Then, specific ROIs were created using the mask of the clustered voxels to perform quantitative analyses of FA values for individual participants. Significant regions were defined by a cluster of voxels (n > 100).

Results

TBSS analysis indicates significant changes of FA, λ// and λ in survivors compared to controls in some major brain structures. Specifically, FA and λ// were significantly lower in white matter tracts of survivor group (orange and red area) (Figure 1). In contrast, significantly higher λ was found in survivor’s white matter tracts (blue area) (Figure 1). (2) ROI analysis showed lower FA in survivors was found in the anterior corpus callosum, bilateral frontal medial, frontal pole, and middle temporal regions, also the left superior frontal, right inferior frontal and right frontal orbital regions. However, a broad range of white matter tracts injury was revealed by λ// including external and internal capsule (1.16±0.20 vs.1.40±0.17 μm2/ms, p<0.05) cortical spinal tract (1.39 ± 0.13 vs. 1.43 ± 0.25 μm2/ms, p<0.05). In regarding of λ⊥, only frontal pole and whole corpus callosum show significantly higher values (0.779 ± 0.068 vs 0.877± 0.054 μm2/ms, p<0.01) (Figure 2).

Discussion and conclusion

While previous studies have shown that WM damage occurs in brain tumor patients treated with radiation and chemotherapy and reduction of FA can be used to measure the WM changes in this population, the current study demonstrated that λ// is more sensitive than FA to detect microstructure changes in white matter (2) Since decreased λ// is considered to be associated to the axonal degeneration and increased λ is related to myelin damage, white matter injury in childhood cancer survivors may mostly involve in diffuse axonal degeneration. On the other hand, the myelin damage appears to be localized in corpus callosum. Although pathological evaluations are needed to correlate the DTI findings, our results indicate that combining analysis of FA, λ// and λ provides more sensitive and specific diagnostic information to assess white matter injury in the adult survivors of childhood brain tumors.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported in part by a Research Scholar Grant from the American Cancer Society to TZK (#RSGPB-CPPB-114044) and a research grant from National Cancer Institute to HM (5R01 CA169937-01A1).

References

1. Crossen JR, Garwood D, Glatstein E and Neuwelt EA. Neurobehavioral sequelae of cranial irradiation in adults: a review of radiation-induced encephalopathy. JCO 1994; 12: 3627-642

2. Wang, S, Wu EX, Qiu D et al. Longitudinal diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging study of radiation-induced white matter damage in a rat model. Cancer Res. 2009; 69:1190-8.

3. King TZ, Wang L, Mao H. Disruption of White Matter Integrity in Adult Survivors of Childhood Brain Tumors: Correlates with Long-Term Intellectual Outcomes. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0131744.

4. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Johansen-Berg H, Rueckert D, Nichols TE, Mackay CE, et al. Tract-based spatial statistics: voxel-wise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. NeuroImage. 2006; 31(4):1487–505.

Figures

Figure 1. Differences in DTI measured white matter integrity between survivors and healthy controls. Clusters of regions with significantly lower FA and λ// found in the survivor group are in orange and red. However, significantly higher λ for the survivor group are in blue.

Figure 2. In comparison of FA detected regions, all white matter tracts showed significantly lower λ// in survivors compared to controls. In regarding of λ, significantly higher λ were only found at frontal pole and corpus callosum.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
4183