Synopsis
Although
Internet addiction (IA) has been increasingly considered as a serious public
health issue for adolescents, its neurobiological mechanisms remain poorly
understood. Therefore, new biomarkers are needed to understanding IA. Using diffusion
tensor images for IA and healthy adolescents, we analyzed brain network to
reveal structural alterations in brain of IA adolescents. IA adolescents showed
increase of regional efficiency in bilateral superior orbitofrontal cortex,
right rectus and parahippocampal gyrus. Severity of IA is correlated with
regional efficiency of brain regions which showed differences between groups.
The brain network analysis can be used to disclose potential functional
deficits in IA.Purpose
We
attempted to find the alterations of the regional network property
between IA and healthy adolescents.
Methods
1. Subjects. Twenty IA adolescents
and twenty healthy adolescents were recruited from the Korea University Ansan
Hospital. Commonly, IA was determined based on Young’s online internet
addiction test (IAT)1 scores of
higher than the proposed scores of 50 in Young’s criteria. The IAT has been
considered as reliable instrument for classifying IA.2 Furthermore, smartphone
addiction scale-short version for adolescents (SAS-SV) proposed by Kwon et al.3
is reliability and validity for assessment of smartphone addiction. In
this study, we classified the healthy adolescents and IA adolescents following
criteria: (1) adolescents which meet criteria of both higher than 70 of IAT
score or 35 of SAS-SV score included IA group; (2) adolescents which meet
criteria of both lower than 35 of IAT score and 30 of SAS-SV score included
healthy group. Institutional Review Board approved the research protocol for
present study and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects or
their parents.
2. Data acquisition. All
imaging data were acquired using a 3T MRI scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany).
The scanning parameters of DTI were as follows: 30 non-collinear diffusion
weighting gradient directions (b=1000 s/mm2) and 12 additional images
without diffusion weighting (b=0 s/mm2). In addition, T1-weighted
structural images were obtained by a magnetization prepared rapid acquisition
gradient echo sequence.
3. Data preprocessing.
Correction
for distortions due to eddy current and head motions was done by affine
transformation on the b0 image using FSL.4 T1-weighted image of each
subject was coregistered to the b0 image using affine transformation. The
coregistered T1-weighted image was mapping to MNI space using non-linear
transformation and then the transformation parameters were applied to DTI using
SPM12. Whole brain fiber tracking was performed using fiber assignment by continuous
tracking algorithm.
4. Network
Construction. The structural brain networks were comprised of the nodes
based on automated anatomical labeling template with 90 brain regions5 and the edges defined as the fiber tracts connected
pair of nodes. If two endpoints of each tract belong to two nodes respectively,
two nodes are considered as anatomically connected.
5. Regional property.
Regional
efficiency reflects the
importance of the nodes for reciprocal communication within the network.6
The
regional efficiency is defined as the average path length between any node and
the other nodes in the brain network.7,8 For statistical
analysis, we performed two sample t-test assuming equal variance.
6. Relationships
between the severity of internet addiction and brain regions. To verify
whether the degree of IA affect the brain regions, we used Pearson correlation
analysis among IAT, SAS-SV scores and brain regions which showed significantly
differences in regional efficiency.
Results
1. Comparison of
Regional property. IA adolescents had greater regional
efficiency in bilateral superior orbitofrontal cortex (ORBsup), right rectus
and parahippocampal gyrus (PHG) (p<0.05). No region showed lower regional
efficiency in IA compared with healthy controls. The detailed information for
regional efficiency is shown in Table 1 and Fig. 1.
2. Relations among IAT,
SAS-SV scores and regional efficiency. As
shown in Fig. 2, Pearson correlation analysis demonstrated significantly
correlation between IAT scores and regional efficiency in left ORBsup (r=0.377,
p=0.008), and IAT and regional efficiency in right ORBsup (r=0.328, p=0.019).
SAS-SV scores were positively correlated with the regional efficiency in left ORBsup
(r=0.309, p=0.026), right ORBsup (r=0.363, p=0.011), right rectus (r=0.265,
p=0.049) and right PHG (r=0.328, p=0.019).
Discussion
Consistent
with previous IA or other addiction studies,9-11 the network
analysis of the regional level showed abnormalities in multiple brain regions. The
results of the regional level analysis may suggest that the structural brain
connections undergo alteration during the course of the addiction and that the
connections may be rewired for optimal information transfer, which result in
some brain regions to be more or less crucial.12 It is likely that
the brain regions may be affected by continuous visual, auditory13 and
rewarding stimulation.14
We also
provided the evidence that the severity of IA is correlated with regional
efficiency in the brain regions with significant differences in the regional efficiency between the two groups. And
according to the further progression of IA, ORBsup, rectus and PHG may be
negatively affected. This may have caused progress of the functional
impairments of the brains of IA adolescents.
Conclusion
Our
findings suggest the regional efficiency as a good biomarker to assess the IA
and provide understanding the reason for the functional impairments in the
brains of IA adolescents.
Acknowledgements
This
research was supported by
National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by
the Ministry of Science (2013R1A1A1012361) and the Leading Foreign Research Institute Recruitment
Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the
Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (2010-00757).References
1.
Young KS. Caught in the net: How to recognize the signs of internet
addiction--and a winning strategy for recovery. New York: J. Wiley. 1998.
2.
Dong G, DeVito E, Huang J, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging reveals thalamus and
posterior cingulate cortex abnormalities in internet gaming addicts. J Psychiatr
Res. 2012;46(9):1212-1216.
3.
Kwon M, Kim, DJ, Cho H, et al. The smartphone addiction scale: development and
validation of a short version for adolescents. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e83558.
4.
Jenkinson M, Beckmann CF, Behrens TE, et al. FSL. Neuroimage. 2012;62(2):782-790.
5.
Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, et al. Automated anatomical labeling
of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI
MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage. 2002;15(1):273-289.
6.
Widjaja E, Zamyadi M, Raybaud C, et al. Disrupted global and regional structural
networks and subnetworks in children with localization-related epilepsy. Am J
Neuroradiol. 2015;36(7):1362-1368.
7.
Cao Q, Shu N, An L, et al. Probabilistic diffusion tractography and graph theory
analysis reveal abnormal white matter structural connectivity networks in drug-naive
boys with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Neurosci. 2013;33(26):10676-10687.
8.
Lawrence AJ, Chung AW, Morris RG, et al. Structural network efficiency is
associated with cognitive impairment in small-vessel disease. Neurology, 2014;83(4):304-311.
9.
Chen X, Wang Y, Zhou Y, et al. Different resting-state functional connectivity alterations
in smokers and nonsmokers with internet gaming addiction. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014:825787.
10. Hong
SB, Kim JW, Choi EJ, et al. Reduced orbitofrontal cortical thickness in male
adolescents with internet addiction. Behav Brain Funct. 2013;9:11.
11.
Ko CH, Liu GC, Yen JY, et al. The brain activations for both cue-induced gaming
urge and smoking craving among subjects comorbid with Internet gaming addiction
and nicotine dependence. J Psychiatr Res. 2013;47(4):486-493.
12.
Drakesmith M, Caeyenberghs K, Dutt A, et al. Schizophrenia-like topological changes in the structural
connectome of individuals with subclinical psychotic experiences. Hum Brain Mapp.
2015;36(7):2629-2643.
13. Han JW, Han DH, Bolo N, et al. Differences in functional connectivity between alcohol dependence and internet gaming disorder. Addict Behav. 2015;41:12-19.
14.
García-García I,
Horstmann A, Jurado M, et al. Reward processing in obesity, substance addiction
and non-substance
addiction. Obes Rev. 2014;15(11):853-869.