Harald Kugel1, Udo Dannlowski2,3, Dominik Grotegerd2, Ronny Redlich2, Nils Opel 2, Katharina Dohm2, Dario Zaremba2, Anne Groegler2, Juliane Schwieren2, Thomas Suslow4, Patricia Ohrmann 2, Jochen Bauer1,2, Axel Krug3, Tilo Kircher3, Christa Hohoff2, Katharina Domschke5, Andreas Jansen3, Pienie Zwitserlood6, Markus Heinrichs7,8, Volker Arolt2, Walter Heindel1, and Bernhard T. Baune9
1Department of Clinical Radiology, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany, 2Department of Psychiatry, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany, 3Department of Psychiatry, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany, 4Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany, 5Department of Psychiatry, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany, 6Department of Psychology, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany, 7Department of Psychology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany, 8Freiburg Brain Imaging Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany, 9School of Medicine, Discipline of Psychiatry, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
Synopsis
Oxytocin is a pro-social and anxiolytic
neuropeptide, especially if the G-allele of a common polymorphism (rs53576) in
the oxytocin receptor gene is
present. Recent studies suggest, however, a detrimental role of this allele in
the context of childhood maltreatment. Structural MRI data show reduced gray
matter volumes of the ventral striatum, fMRI shows increased amygdala
responsiveness associated with increased CTQ (maltreatment) score. Thus for
individuals with adverse childhood experiences the G-allele may be a
vulnerability factor.Purpose
Oxytocin has received much attention as a pro-social and anxiolytic
neuropeptide (1). Its role in trust, social attachment, anxiety, fear conditioning, and amygdala
responsiveness to emotional stimuli has been shown (1,2). In human
studies, the G-allele of a common variant (rs53576) in the oxytocin receptor
gene (
OXTR) has been associated with
protective properties such as reduced stress response, and higher
receptiveness for social support (3-5). In contrast, recent studies suggest a
detrimental role of the rs53576 G-allele in the context of childhood
maltreatment (6,7). To further elucidate the role of
OXTR, gene x maltreatment (GxE) interaction on brain structure and function
was investigated, based on the assumptions that (A) the previously described
effect of reduced gray matter volumes in limbic areas after childhood
maltreatment (8,9) is stronger in GG homozygotes than in A-allele carriers, and
(B) maltreatment related amygdala responsiveness to emotional facial
expressions (9-12) is stronger in G-allele than in A-allele carriers.
Methods
N=309 healthy adults underwent structural and functional MRI during a
frequently used emotional face-matching task. All subjects were genotyped for
OXTR rs53576. Childhood maltreatment was
assessed using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) (13). Reward dependence (RD),
a pro-social trait, was assessed using Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire (TPQ) scores (14). Gray matter volumes
were investigated by means of voxel-based morphometry (VBM) across the entire
brain.
MR images were acquired on a 3 T-MR scanner (Gyroscan Intera 3T, Philips, Best,
NL) with a 3D fast gradient echo sequence (TFE), TR/TE/FA 7.4 ms/3.4 ms/9°,
inversion prepulse every 815 ms, acquired over a FoV of 256 mm (FH, frequency
encoding) x 204 mm (AP, phase encoding) x 160 mm (RL, phase encoding, nominal
slice selection direction) with cubic voxels of 1 mm edge length, reconstructed
to 0.5 mm. The VBM8-toolbox was used for preprocessing the structural images
with default parameters within a unified model (15) including DARTEL
normalization. Group statistics were calculated using SPM8, CTQ scores were
entered as covariate. In addition, to accomodate the skewed distribution of CTQ
scores, a categorical model (history of maltreatment yes/no) was used.
Amygdala responses to facial
expressions were investigated using a paradigm consisting of 4 blocks of a face
processing task - trios with faces of the Ekman & Friesen stimulus set (16)
must be checked for matching faces - alternating with 5 blocks of a sensorimotor
control task, frequently used for imaging genetics (9,17,18). fMRI data were
acquired with a single shot EPI sequence, TR/TE/FA 2.1 s/30 ms/90°, 34 slices
tilted 25° from the AC/PC line, no gap, matrix 64x64, cubic voxels with 3.6 mm
edge length. After exclusions for technical reasons, N=264 datasets were
available for fMRI analysis of bilateral amygdala, using a full-factorial model
with genotype as between subjects factor and CTQ scores as covariate.
Results
While no significant main effects of genotype were detected, structural MRI data revealed a robust interaction of rs53576 genotype
and CTQ-scores mapping specifically to the bilateral ventral striatum. GG
homozygotes but not A-allele carriers showed strong gray matter reduction with
increasing CTQ-scores (Fig.
1). The categorial model (maltreatment y/n) yielded almost identical results. An effect of gender on the GxE (gene x environment) effect was not observed. Concerning fMRI, a main effect of maltreatment mapping to the right amygdala was found, as well as a main effect of genotype: GG homozygotes showed increased amygdala response to angry and fearful faces, compared to A-allele carriers (Fig. 2). No GxE interaction was found. In turn, RD scores from the TPQ showed that lower ventral striatum gray matter volumes were associated with
lower reward dependence.
Discussion
In GG homozygotes, a negative correlation of gray matter volume in the ventral striatum and the degree of childhood maltreatment was detected, while A-allele carriers did not show this detrimental maltreatment effect. Second, amygdala responsiveness to emotional cues is stronger in GG homozygotes than in A-allele carriers.The higher receptiveness for social cues in GG homozygotes may result
in a stronger profit from beneficial environments, but less resilience
to detrimental effects of childhood maltreatment, while A-allele
carriers are less affected by positive or negative aspects of their
early environment.
In conclusion, the
findings suggest that the G-allele constitutes a vulnerability factor for
specifically altered limbic brain structure in individuals with adverse
childhood experiences, complemented by increased limbic responsiveness to
emotional interpersonal stimuli. While oxytocinergic signaling facilitates attachment
and bonding in supportive social environments, this attunement for social cues
may turn disadvantageous under early adverse conditions.
Acknowledgements
The study was supported by grants from the German Research Foundation (DFG; grant FOR 2107; DA1151/5-1) and Innovative Medizinische Forschung (IMF) of the Medical Faculty, University of Muenster (DA120903/DA111107/DA211021 to UD). We thank Ahmad Hariri for providing the fMRI paradigm.References
(1)
Meyer-Lindenberg A, Domes G, Kirsch P, Heinrichs M, Nat Rev Neurosci 2011; 2: 524–538. (2) Heinrichs M, von Dawans B, Domes G, Front Neuroendocrinol 2009; 30:
548–557. (3) Kumsta R, Heinrichs M, Curr
Opin Neurobiol 2013; 23: 11–16.
(4) Rodrigues SM, Saslow LR, Garcia N, John OP, Keltner D, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:
21437–21441. (5) Tost H, Kolachana B,
Hakimi S, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107:
13936–13941. (6) McQuaid RJ, McInnis OA,
Stead JD, Matheson K, Anisman H, Front
Neurosci 2013; 7: 128. (7)
Hostinar CE, Cicchetti D, Rogosch FA, Dev
Psychopathol 2014; 26: 465–477.
(8) Edmiston EE, Wang F, Mazure CM, Guiney J, Sinha R, Mayes LC, Blumberg
HP, Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med
2011; 165: 1069–1077. (9) Dannlowski U,
Stuhrmann A, Beutelmann V, et al.
Biol Psychiatry 2012; 71:
286–293. (10) Dannlowski U, Kugel H,
Huber F, et al. Hum Brain Mapp 2013; 34:
2899–2909. (11) Van Harmelen A-L, van
Tol M-J, Demenescu LR, et al. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2013; 8: 362-369. (12) McCrory EJ, De Brito SA, Kelly PA, et al. Br J Psychiatry 2013; 202: 269–276. (13) Bernstein DP, Fink L, Handelsman L, et al. Am J Psychiatry 1994; 151: 1132–1136. (14) Weyers P, Krebs H, Janke W, Pers Individ Dif 1995; 19:
853–861. (15) Ashburner J, Friston KJ,
Neuroimage
2005; 26: 839–851. (16) Ekman P, Friesen
W V. Pictures of facial affect.
Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press 1976.
(17) Dannlowski U, Kugel H, Franke F, et al. Neuropsychopharmacology
2011; 36: 1897-1885. (18) Hariri AR, Mattay
VS, Tessitore A, et al. Science 2002; 297: 400–403.