Florian Schubert1, Ralf Mekle1, Johanna Balz2, Julian Keil2, Yadira Roa Romero2, Bernd Ittermann1, Jürgen Gallinat3, and Daniel Senkowski2
1Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Braunschweig and Berlin, Germany, 2Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 3Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
Synopsis
Findings of deviant glutamate (Glu) and glutamine
(Gln) levels in brain of patients support the glutamate hypothesis of
schizophrenia. Thickness and volume of the left superior temporal gyrus (STG) are
established endophenotypes of schizophrenia. We quantified glutamatergic
metabolites using proton MRS with SPECIAL in the left STG of schizophrenic
patients and controls, and investigated the relationships between Glu and
personality traits. Glu was significantly
higher in patients than in controls, Gln likewise but with a weak trend only. Glu
predicted neuroticism in patients. Our results suggest dysfunctional glutamatergic neurotransmission in STG and
confirm widespread Glu increases in cortical regions in schizophrenia.Introduction
Research in schizophrenia
has recently turned its attention to deficits in the glutamatergic system as a
potential etiological factor. Findings of deviant glutamate (Glu)
1
and glutamine (Gln)
2,3 levels in various brain regions in schizophrenic
patients support the glutamate hypothesis of schizophrenia
4. However,
the literature is inconclusive as for the direction of differences between
healthy and diseased brain and, due to the difficulty to determine Glu and Gln
separately, often reports only their sum, Glx, which weakens the significance. Alterations
of thickness and volume of the left superior temporal gyrus (STG) have been well
established as endophenotype of schizophrenia
5 but this region has not
been examined in schizophrenic patients using MR spectroscopy as yet. Therefore
we performed proton MRS in the left STG of schizophrenic patients and healthy
controls, focusing on the separate quantification of glutamatergic metabolites.
In addition, the relationships between Glu in STG and personality traits were investigated.
Methods
Nineteen chronic, medicated schizophrenic
patients and 21 sex and age matched healthy volunteers participated in the
study. MR measurements were performed on a 3T Verio scanner (Siemens Healthcare,
Erlangen, Germany) using a 32-channel receive head coil. Following MPRAGE
imaging and adjustment of all first and second order shims using FAST(EST)MAP,
MR spectra were acquired from a voxel of 20 x 30 x 20 mm
3
encompassing the left STG positioned below the upper bank of the temporal
cortex (Fig. 1), using the spin echo full intensity acquired localized (SPECIAL)
method
6 with TR = 3 s, TE = 8.5 ms, 256 averages and
1024 ms acquisition time. Spectra were retrospectively corrected for frequency
drift, analyzed using LCModel with a simulated basis set containing 20
metabolites, and referenced to an unsuppressed water scan. Amplitudes were
corrected for relaxation using values for T1 and T2 measured for Glu at 3 T
7,8,
and for the amount of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the voxels from the
segmented T1-weighted images using SPM8. Personality traits were obtained using
the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (the personality dimensions neuroticism,
extraversion, openness, agreeableness and conscientiousness).
Results
The mean linewidth of water
spectra from the STG voxel after shimming (± SD) amounted to (7.9 ± 0.7) Hz. Linewidths
did not differ significantly between controls and patients. Fig. 1 illustrates the
quality of the SPECIAL spectra from STG and shows the fit results for Glu and
Gln and the residual. Cramér-Rao lower bounds (CRLB) returned by LCModel were
all far below 10 % for Glu (4.3 ± 0.8) %, whereas for Gln values of three
patients and three controls were omitted because CRLB exceeded 20 %. Glu concentration (in mmol/l, mean ± SD) in
the left STG was significantly higher in patients (9.19 ± 1.11) than in
controls (8.15 ± 1.23,
p = 0.008).
Likewise, Gln in patients exceeded that in controls (1.99 ± 0.56 vs. 1.74 ± 0.57),
but reflecting a weak trend only (
p =
0.17). The mean CSF fractions in STG of patients and control subjects did not
differ significantly, indicating that the concentration differences were not feigned
by different CSF contents in the voxels. No differences in the concentrations
of N-acetylaspartate, total creatine, total choline and myo-inositol between
control subjects and patients were observed. Of the neuropsychological tests
used, different scores for patients and controls were observed for neuroticism
(25.6 ± 6.3 vs. 15.9 ± 7.5,
p = 0.0001) and extraversion (21.7 ± 4.7 vs. 27.6 ± 3.9,
p = 0.0001). In patients, there was a significant
negative correlation of the neuroticism score with Glu concentration (
p = 0.018, Fig. 2).
Discussion and conclusion
Using the described methodology permits to determine glutamate
concentrations with excellent precision. For glutamine the precision was
considerably lower but still permitted to use most of the datasets for separately
comparing glutamine and glutamate levels in the STG. Our results demonstrate
elevated glutamate in the left STG and thus suggest dysfunctional glutamatergic
neurotransmission in an area which reflects an endophenotype of schizophrenia. Glutamine
in patients might be elevated as well, but the increased statistical
uncertainty due to the larger error when measuring a metabolite of low
concentration requires a larger sample to be analyzed. Taken together with
recent reports, we confirm widespread Glu increase in cortical brain regions in
schizophrenia. Whether these deviations constitute etiological or consequential
findings remains to be elucidated. Although differing in the tests used, our
results concerning neuroticism and extraversion are in line with others
9
that show glutamatergic metabolites in other cortical regions to be associated with
neuropsychological test deficits in schizophrenia. Increased glutamate might
reflect a compensatory mechanism to neuroticism in schizophrenic patients.
Acknowledgements
This work was
supported by grants from the German Research Foundation (GA707/6-1, KE1828/2-1 and SE1859/3-1)
and the European Union (ERC-2010-StG-20091209).
References
1. Marsman A, et al. Schizophrenia Bull 2011; 39:120-9.
2. Thébérge J, et al. Psychiat Res 2004;132:33-9.
3. Bustillo, JR, et al. JAMA Psychiat 2014;71:265-72.
4. Coyle JT, Biochem Pharmacol 2004;68:1507-14.
5. Wolthusen RPF, et al. World J Biol Psychiat 2015;16:430-40.
6. Mlynárik V, et al. Magn Reson Med 2006;56:965–70.
7. Mullins PG, et al. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:964–9.
8. Schubert F, et al. Neuroimage 2004;21:1762-71.
9. Dempster K, et al.
Psychiat Res 2015;233:180-5.