A 7T MRS Study of First Episode Psychosis: glutamatergic abnormalities and correlations with symptom severity
Subechhya Pradhan1, Anouk Marsman1, Rebecca Ward2, Candice Ford2, Ashley Lloyd2, David Schretlen1,2, Akira Sawa2, and Peter B. Barker1,3

1The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States, 2Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States, 3Radiology, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States

Synopsis

Imbalance in glutamatergic systems is implicated in the pathophysiology of psychosis. The purpose of this study was to assess differences in metabolite levels between subjects with a first episode of psychosis (FEP) and healthy controls, and to study correlations between metabolites and measures of disease severity, including neuropsychological scales, positive and negative symptoms.

Introduction

Glutamatergic and GABAergic systems are believed to play a role in the pathophysiology of psychosis1,2. This abstract presents results from an interim analysis of an ongoing study the differences in metabolite levels along with metabolite correlations with neuropsychiatric measures in first episode psychosis (FEP) subjects and healthy controls from our on going study.

Methods

45 FEP subjects and 70 healthy controls participated in this study to date. All FEP subjects had a diagnosis of psychosis (43.8% schizophrenia) and were recruited within the first two years of disease onset and were on antipsychotic medication at the time of the scan. All participants underwent a set of neuropsychiatric evaluations3 (CNNS), and the FEP subjects also underwent positive and negative symptom rating (SAPS and SANS). MR methods: Participants were scanned using a 7T scanner (Philips ‘Achieva’, Best, Netherlands) equipped with a 32-channel head coil (Nova Medical, Orlando, FL). Spectra were recorded from anterior cingulate cortex (ACC; 30x20x20 mm3, Figure 1), left centrum semiovale (CSO; 40x20x15 mm3), left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC; 25x20x20 mm3), left orbitofrontal cortex (OFC; 20x20x20 mm3), and bilateral thalamus (Thal, 20x30x15 mm3) using a STEAM sequence (TE/TM/TR=14/33/3000 ms, 128 NEX, 16 NEX water). Spectra were analyzed in LCModel4 using water as an internal reference and a basis set simulated in VESPA5. Statistical analysis: Differences between groups were compared using students t-test, and linear regression performed for GABA, Glu, Gln, GSH, NAA, NAAG, tCr, tCho and tNAA concentrations vs. composite CNNS scores, SAPS and SANS.

Results

Representative spectrum from the ACC along with LCModel fit is shown in Figure 1. Metabolite levels that were significantly different between FEP and control subjects are given in Table 1. In patients, significant positive correlations were found between CNNS scores and GABA (p =0.024) , NAAG (p=0.008) and tCho (p=0.017) in the OFC, significant negative correlation between SAPS score and OFC NAA (p=0.039); and significant negative correlation between SANS rating scale and ACC GABA (p=0.042), CSO Glu (p=0.007), CSO Glx (p=0.013) and OFC GABA (p=0.018).

Discussion

Reductions in NAA in FEP in cortical regions and thalamus are consistent with neuronal damage/dysfunction in these regions. In addition, Gln was increased in DLPFC and CSO, Glu decreased in ACC, and NAAG decreased in CSO, suggesting possible glutamatergic dysfunction in multiple brain regions. Glutamatergic metabolite levels also correlated with measures of disease severity (e.g. the negative correlation of SANS with ACC GABA, CSO Glu, CSO Glx and OFC GABA) further suggesting a central role of these metabolites in the pathophysiology of psychosis. However, a larger sample size and further analyses are required to confirm these interim findings.

Acknowledgements

NIH grants R01MH096263, R01MH092443; Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation

References

1.Rowland et al. Schizophrenia Bulletin 2013: 39:1096-104; 2. Theberge et al. Am J Psychiatry 2002: 159: 1944-46; 3. Testa et al. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2009: 15:1012-22. 4. Provencher, S.W; MRM. 1993; 30:672-679; 5. http://scion.duhs.duke.edu/vespa/simulation

Figures

Figure 1: Voxel location and LCmodel results from the ACC.

Table 1. Metabolite concentrations (i.u., mean ± st. dev.) in FEP and control subject



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
4134