Synopsis
Although most of
strokes occur in asymptomatic patients, most studies have been conducted in
symptomatic cohort. Here we aimed to
characterize ICAD in stroke-free participants and compare with stroke patients using
3D high-resolution contrast-enhanced BBMRI. Nineteen asymptomatic and 15 stroke patients
were included and underwent a standardized protocol which contains 3D TOF MRA and pre- and post-contrast 3D BBMRI
imaging. Plaque enhancement
was categorized, and morphology and signal-based measurements were compared.
The results showed that asymptomatic plaques demonstrated lower
contrast-enhancement compared with symptomatic plaques. Contrast-enhancement
of ICAD may serve as a marker for plaque stability, providing
insight into stroke risk.Introduction
Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is
a major cause of ischemic stroke worldwide and associated with a high risk of
recurrent stoke
1. It is
a chronic disease and tends to progress silently over years, providing an
opportunity for diagnosis before events occur. Although 77% of strokes occur in asymptomatic
patients, most studies have been conducted in symptomatic ICAD patients or
patients referred for a family history of stroke
2. Therefore,
the detection and characterization of ICAD in its asymptomatic stage may provide
insight into stroke risk and primary prevention of stroke. Recent development of 3D high-resolution black-blood MRI imaging
(BBMRI) allows
for screening ICAD and provides
reliable plaque measurements, even before causing luminal narrowing
3. The plaque
enhancement on 3D BBMRI entailed after gadolinium contrast is associated with culprit plaques (i.e., responsible for downstream ischemic events)
4, while its role in stroke-free individuals
remains unknown. Therefore, we aimed to
characterize ICAD in an asymptomatic population using 3D high-resolution
contrast-enhanced BBMRI and compare with those from stroke patients.
Methods
Participants for this study were drawn from
those who attended the fifth visit (2011 to 2013) of the Atherosclerosis Risk
in Communities (ARIC) study, a community-based prospective study initiated in 1987-1989. Nineteen asymptomatic participants with identified ICAD (9 male; mean
age 78.8 ± 6.3 years) were recruited based on the previous
BBMRI/MRA in ARIC visit 5. All MRI scans were performed on a 3T MRI
Achieva scanner using a 32-channel head coil.
High-resolution intracranial vessel wall imaging was acquired based on a
standardized protocol
5 that
included 3D time-of-flight (TOF) MRA and pre- and post-contrast 3D BBMRI imaging. The 3D TOF MRA was acquired in a transverse
plane with the following parameters: TR/TE/flip angle, 23 ms/3.5 ms/25°; FOV,
160 mm x 160 mm; acquired resolution, 0.55×0.55×1.1 mm
3 and scan
time of approximately 6 minutes. The 3D BBMRI sequence was performed by using
an anti-driven based variable-flip-angle TSE sequence (ADE-BBMRI) in a coronal
plane (50-mm-thick slab) optimized for flow suppression and wall delineation. The following parameters were used: TR/TE, 2000ms/37ms;
TSE factor, 60 including 4 startup echoes; echo spacing, 6.1ms; sense factor,
2; half scan factor (partial Fourier) of 0.6; oversampling factor, 1.2; number of averages,
1; acquired resolution, 0.5x0.5x0.5 mm
3; scan time, 5.4 minutes. The ADE-BBMRI sequence was repeated with a TR of 1000ms for T1 weighted contrast in axial
plane (80-mm-thick slab) to approximate the same scan time. Gadovist (gadobutrol) was administered intravenously (0.1 mmol/kg) and the
BBMRI images were repeated five minutes after contrast administration. Fifteen
stroke patients recruited from the local hospital and underwent the standardized
protocol were included for comparison. Plaque
enhancement was categorized on BBMRI based on the previous criteria
4
(Figure 1). Morphology- (stenosis,
plaque size, normalized wall index (NWI)) and signal-based (contrast-enhancement (%CE), signal heterogeneity) measurements were compared between two
groups.
Results
The
clinical and plaque characteristics of the study population are shown in Figure 2.
A total of 86 plaques were identified in
19 ARIC participants (mean, 4.7/person), and 70 identified in 15 stroke
patients (mean, 4.5/person). Non-enhanced plaques (grade 0) were more frequently
identified in ARIC participants compared with those from stroke patients (ARIC,
63% versus Stroke, 20%, p<0.01). In
stroke patients, all culprit plaques showed enhanced (40% grade 1, 60% grade
2), whereas the non-enhancement was exclusively observed in non-culprit plaques
(Figure 3). Quantitative measurements
were performed in 15 pairs of asymptomatic and culprit plaques, matched with degree of stenosis
and the plaque location (MCA, 2; ACA, 1; ICA, 6; PCA, 1; BA, 3; VA, 2). Asymptomatic plaques demonstrated lower %CE and smaller NWI than culprit plaques (%CE,
12.1±4.0 vs. 34.1±8.0, p< 0.001; NWI, 56.0±7.9 vs. 69.6±21.4, p =0.052
(marginally significant), respectively). There were no difference identified
for other measurements between two groups.
Conclusion
Contrast-enhancement of ICAD demonstrated
distinct differences between asymptomatic and symptomatic groups, and may serve
as a marker of its stability, providing insight
into stroke risk.
Discussion
Gadolinium contrast enhancement is thought to relate
to the plaque inflammation and neovascularization, both of which facilitate the
accumulation of the contrast agent within the atherosclerotic plaque. However, it can also occur after the plaque
rupture, because of the denudated endothelium layer with an increased
permeability. Most current studies of ICAD have underwent BBMRI after the stroke,
which limited our ability to discern the exact mechanism accounting for
contrast enhancement. To our knowledge,
this was the first study to investigate the contrast enhancement in an
asymptomatic population using the 3T high resolution contrast-enhanced MRI.
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by NIH NHLBI R00HL106232References
1. Holmstedt CA, Turan TN, Chimowitz MI. Atherosclerotic
intracranial arterial stenosis: Risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. The Lancet. Neurology. 2013;12:1106-1114
2.Lloyd-Jones D, Adams
RJ, Brown TM, Carnethon M, Dai S, De Simone G, Ferguson TB, Ford E, Furie K,
Gillespie C, Go A, Greenlund K, Haase N, Hailpern S, Ho PM, Howard V, Kissela
B, Kittner S, Lackland D, Lisabeth L, Marelli A, McDermott MM, Meigs J,
Mozaffarian D, Mussolino M, Nichol G, Roger V, Rosamond W, Sacco R, Sorlie P,
Stafford R, Thom T, Wasserthiel-Smoller S, Wong ND, Wylie-Rosett J. Heart
disease and stroke statistics--2010 update. A report from the american heart
association. Circulation. 2009
3.Lee WJ, Choi HS, Jang
J, Sung J, Kim TW, Koo J, Shin YS, Jung SL, Ahn KJ, Kim BS. Non-stenotic
intracranial arteries have atherosclerotic changes in acute ischemic stroke
patients: A 3t mri study. Neuroradiology.
2015;57:1007-1013
4.Qiao Y, Zeiler SR,
Mirbagheri S, Leigh R, Urrutia V, Wityk R, Wasserman BA. Intracranial plaque
enhancement in patients with cerebrovascular events on high-spatial-resolution
mr images. Radiology.
2014;271:534-542
5.Qiao Y, Steinman DA,
Qin Q, Etesami M, Schar M, Astor BC, Wasserman BA. Intracranial arterial wall
imaging using three-dimensional high isotropic resolution black blood mri at
3.0 tesla. Journal of magnetic resonance
imaging : JMRI. 2011;34:22-30