Synopsis
Alzheimer disease (AD) is characterized clinically by progressive cognitive decline, and
pathologically by the
presence in the brain of senile plaques composed
primarily of amyloid-beta peptide and neurofibrillary tangles
containing hyperphosphorylated tau protein. Here
we investigated the effects ofa naturally
occurring amide of ethanolamine and palmitic acid (PEA), abundant in the CNS to contrast the AD phenotype in
triple transgene (PS1, APP and Tau) mice model, by in vivo 1H MRI
and MRS and histology. Our data indicate that PEA treatment affects
brain metabolism as a function of age and that PEA rescues altered molecular
pathways that can mimic some traits of ADIntroduction
AD is the most common form of neurodegenerative dementias.
1 Amyloid-beta
(Abeta) deposition in senile plaques, neurofibrillary
tangle formation and neuro-inflammation are the major pathogenic mechanisms
that remain to be clarified. Data from animal models and
human autopsy revealed that reactive gliosis might exert a key pathogenetic
role in AD.
2 On the basis of these considerations, it is reasonable
to assume that early combination of neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory
treatments aimed at restoring astrocyte functions may represent an appropriate
approach to treat AD.
3
PEA is a naturally occurring amide of
ethanolamine and palmitic acid, abundant in the CNS, and produced by glial
cells,
4 studied for its anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects.
3,5-8Purpose
In
the present work we exploited the availability of a transgenic model of AD
(3xTg-AD) harboring three mutant human genes (betaAPPSwe, PS1M146V, tauP301L)
to investigate if chronic PEA treatment might modulate the onset and the
progression of Abeta and tau pathologies. The 3xTg-AD mice develop amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary pathology in
AD-relevant brain regions (Hip, cortex) and mimic the disease progression in
humans.
9-11Methods
An integrated approach, involving
histological and spectroscopic studies were used. The main experimental
strategy involved a longitudinal ageing study examining metabolic alteration
and relating any changes with indices of brain pathology taken from a subset of
mice killed at 6 and 12 months of age. The experiment compared 6 (n=11) and 12
months of age (n=16) 3xTg-AD mice and
wildtype controls (wt n=13 and n=14, for 6 and 12 months, respectively). Chronic
PEA treatment were given to evaluate its impact on the onset of the
neuropathology. In particular, 3-month-old mice were continuously infused
(subcutaneously) up to 90 days via osmotic mini-pumps with 10mg/kg of PEA and
vehicle. Moreover, in order to elucidate whether the progression of Abeta and
tau pathologies are impacted by the PEA administration, another set of animals
at 9 months of age were chronically treated as previously described and tested
until they reach 12 months of age.
At the end of treatment
animals undergo MRI and MRS scanning to evaluate genotype- and treatment-
induced differences in brain metabolism.
MR examinations were performed on VARIAN Inova MRI/MRS
system (4.7T) and a combination of volume and surface coil (RAPID Biomedical). Multislice fast spin-echo (TR/TEeff=3000/70ms, ns=2, slice thickness 1mm,
matrix 128x256) sagittal images were acquired to localise the regions of
interest. Single-voxel localised
1H MR spectra (PRESS,TR/TE=4000/23ms,
ns=256) were collected from: prefrontal cortex (PFC), 10.8ml and hippocampus (Hip), 9.5ml. Spectra were analysed by using LCModel
program and unsuppressed water signal as reference.
12 Statistical
analysis was performed by using ANOVA (2x2 genotype and treatment).
Results and Discussion
Quantitative MRS analyses and their
significant differences due to genotype or treatment are summarized in Fig.1.
In PFC at 6 months post-hoc
analyses showed increased Ins in 3xTg-AD with respect to wt in both PEA- and
vehicle-treated mice, an increase of tCr in vehicle-treated mice and of Tau in
PEA-treated mice. At 12 months PEA effect was observed in all mice as an
increase of tCr, and as an increase of Ins and Tau in 3xTG-AD mice only.
In Hip at 6 months
post-hoc analyses revealed a tCho increase, as PEA effect, in 3xTg-AD only
mice. At 12 month, an increase of Glu was observed in 3xTg-AD with respect to
wt mice.
Our studies show that PEA treatment increase tCr in
the PFC in the 3xTg-AD mice suggesting a change in energy metabolism. The
apparent paradox of Ins decrease at 12 months in 3xTg-AD with respect to 6
months, could be not directly associated with the occurrence of Abeta, but associated
with a change in the balance of neuronal/glial contributions. In fact, at 6
months the higher level of Ins of 3xTg-AD with respect to WT mice could be due to
an increase of microglia and/or astrocytes activity, while at 12 months PEA could
help to restore the original neuronal/glial balance.13
Our findings are
supported by parallel RT-PCR and Western blot analyses. In 6 months old mice, an increase of markers
related to glia activation and neuroinflammation (e.g. S100B, GFAP, iNOS) in Hip
homogenates was found. On the contrary, data from 12 months old mice revealed a
reduction of some of these factors, suggesting a decrease of glia activity.
Conclusions
Our data indicate that PEA treatment affects
brain metabolism. The current investigation provides evidence that PEA rescues
altered molecular pathways that can mimic some traits of AD. Considering the safety
and tolerability of PEA in humans, our findings offer new opportunity in AD
treatment.
Acknowledgements
This
work was supported by the Italian Ministry of Instruction, University and
Research grants (MIUR; PON01-02512 and PRIN2009)References
1) Goedert M and
Spillantini MG, Science 2006,314,777-81
2) Craft JM, Watterson DM, Van Eldik LJ. Glia.
2006 53(5):484-490;
3) Scuderi C, Stecca C, Valenza M. et al. Cell
Death Dis 2014;5:e1419;
4) Cadas H, di Tomaso E, Piomelli D, J Neurosci
1997;17:1226-42
5) Calignano
A, La Rana G, Giuffrida A, Piomelli D, Nature 1998;394:277-81;
6) Franklin
A, Parmentier-Batteur S, Walter L, et al. Neurosci 2003;23:7767-75;
7) D’agostino G et al, Nuropsychopharmac;ology
2012, 37, 1784-1792;
8) Scuderi C & Steardo L, CNS &
Neurological disorders – drug targets 2013, 12,62-69.
9) Oddo S, Caccamo A, Kitazawa M, et al. Neurobiol Aging 2003;
24, 1063–1070.
10) Oddo S, Caccamo A, Shepherd JD, et al. Neuron 2003b; 39, 409–421.
11) Billings LM, Oddo S, Green KN, et al. Neuron 2005;
45, 675– 688.
12) De Filippis B, Fabbri A, Simone D, Canese R, et al. Neuropsychopharmacology.
2012;37(5):1152-63;
13) Marjanska M, Curran GL, Wengenack TM, et al.
PNAS 2005, 102 11906-10.