Paola Valsasina1, Maria Assunta Rocca1, Emanuele Pravatà 1,2, Gianna Riccitelli1, Giancarlo Comi3, Andrea Falini4, and Massimo Filippi1
1Neuroimaging Research Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy, 2Department of Neuroradiology, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland, 3Department of Neurology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy, 4Department of Neuroradiology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
Synopsis
In this study,
we investigated cortical thickness abnormalities associated with cognitive impairment
and depression in 126 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Compared with
controls, MS patients exhibited a widespread bilateral cortical thinning
involving all brain lobes. While cognitive
impairment was associated with atrophy of regions located in the
fronto-parietal lobes (including the middle and superior frontal gyrus, the
inferior parietal lobule and the precuneus), depression was linked to atrophy
of the orbitofrontal cortex. This study shows that cortical thickness analysis
was able to detect specific effects of clinical symptoms on cortical atrophy in
MS.Cognitive
impairment frequently affects patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) (in
proportions depending on the population studied, the tests used and cut-off values
applied [1,2]). Depression is also a frequent symptom in MS [3]. The relationship
between the occurrence of depression and psychosocial factors, cognitive
impairment, fatigue and side effects of medication has not been fully elucidated
yet [3]. Cognitive impairment has been associated to the presence of a
widespread cortical atrophy, especially in frontal and temporal regions and the
thalamus [4-7], while depression has been associated with atrophy of the middle
and inferior frontal gyri [4,8]. However, investigations of the specific effects
of cognitive impairment and depression on cortical atrophy in MS are lacking.
Methods
High-resolution brain 3D T1-weighted scans were acquired
at 3.0 T from 126 patients with MS (52/74 men/women, mean age=37.7 years,
SD=11.7 years) and 59 matched healthy
controls (28/31 men/women, mean age=37.9 years, SD=9.6 years). Cognitive
assessment was performed by using the Brief Repeatable
Battery of Neuropsychological Tests (BRB-N) [1]. Patients with at least two
abnormal tests (defined as a score more than 2 SDs below the Italian normative
values provided by Amato et al. [10]) were considered cognitively impaired
(CI). Depression was assessed using the
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) [9]. Patients were classified as depressed (D) if their
MADRS score was >9.
After
refilling of T1 hypointensities, reconstruction of cortical surfaces and cortical
thickness assessment was performed with FreeSurfer 5.3
(http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu). A vertex-by-vertex analysis was used to assess differences of cortical thickness between controls
and MS patients, as well as among patient subgroups. The following effects
were tested: a) main effect of disease (healthy controls vs MS patients); b) main effect of depression (D vs non-D MS patients); c) main effect
of cognitive impairment (CI MS vs CP
MS patients); d) conjunction analyses to test specific effects of cognitive
impairment (on both D and non-D MS) and depression (on both CI and CP MS). T-statistics
were thresholded at p=0.01, cluster extent = 50 mm2. Significance was also tested at p<0.05,
false-discovery rate corrected for multiple comparisons.
Results
Sixty-five MS
patients (51%) were classified as D, while 34 MS patients (27%) were CI. The
concomitant presence of depression and cognitive impairment was detected in 15
MS patients (12%).
Compared with
controls, MS patients exhibited a widespread bilateral cortical thinning
involving all brain lobes. Regions showing significant cortical atrophy
included the bilateral middle frontal, inferior frontal and orbitofrontal
cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, bilateral pre- and postcentral gyrus,
inferior and superior parietal and temporal cortices, bilateral precuneus,
lingual gyrus and entorhinal cortex (Figure 1). No regions of significantly
increased cortical thickness were detected in MS vs controls.
Compared with CP
MS, CI MS patients showed significant decrease of cortical thickness in several
bilateral regions of the frontal, temporal and parietal lobes, including the
middle and superior frontal and temporal gyrus, pre- and postcentral gyrus,
inferior and superior parietal lobule, precuneus and posterior cingulate cortex
(Figure 2). No region of significantly increased cortical thickness was
detected in CI vs CP MS patients.
Compared with
non-D MS, D MS patients showed significant cortical thinning of the frontal
lobe, including the bilateral medial and lateral orbitofrontal cortex,
bilateral middle frontal gyrus and left inferior frontal gyrus. D MS patients
showed also significant atrophy of the bilateral entorhinal cortex and
pericalcarine cortex, left insula, temporal pole and inferior frontal gyrus
(Figure 3). No region of increased cortical thickness was detected in D vs non-D MS.
The conjunction
analysis showed a selective effect of cognitive impairment on cortical thinning
of the bilateral superior frontal gyrus, bilateral superior parietal lobule,
left entorhinal cortex and right precuneus (Figure 4). Conversely, a selective
effect of depression was found on cortical thinning of the bilateral
orbitofrontal cortex and right temporal pole (Figure 4).
Conclusions
Cortical thickness analysis is able to detect specific effects of
clinical symptoms on cortical atrophy in MS. While cognitive impairment seems
to be associated with atrophy of regions located in the fronto-parietal lobes, depression
seems to be linked to atrophy of the orbitofrontal cortex.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Rao S.M. et
al., Neurology 1991;41:685-691.
[2] Chiaravalloti N.D., et al. Lancet Neurol 2008;7:1139-1151.
[3] Sadovnick
A.D., et al., Neurology 1996;46:628-632.
[4] Benedict
R.H., et al., Arch Neurol 2004;61:226-230.
[5] Amato M.P., et
al. Arch Neurol 2007;64:1157-1161.
[6] Riccitelli G.,
et al. Hum Brain Mapp 2009;32:1535-1543.
[7] Calabrese M.,
et al. Neurology 2010;74:321-328.
[8] Gobbi C., et
al. Mult Scler 2014;20:192-201.
[9] Montgomery S.A., et al. Br J Psychiatry 1979;134:382-389.
[10] Amato M.P.,
et al. Mult Scler 2006;12:787-793.