Sneha Pandya1, Yan Zhang1, Thanh Nguyen1, Yi Wang1, Susan A Gauthier2, and Sneha Pandya1
1Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States, 2Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States
Synopsis
MRI-derived measures of
lesion accrual and tissue loss have acquired a central role in the
understanding of MS disease evolution, pathogenesis of symptoms, and prediction
of clinical outcome. Conventional MRI imaging is highly sensitive for detection
of MS lesions, which are characteristically hyperintense on a T2 weighted
images, however this technique lacks pathological specificity. QSM can help identify
myelin and iron content changes during an MS lesion’s lifetime.Purpose
Conventional
MRI imaging is highly sensitive for detection of MS lesions, which are
characteristically hyperintense on a T2 weighted images, however this technique
lacks pathological specificity and as a result edema, demyelination,
remyelination, axonal loss and gliosis are indistinguishable (1). QSM describes the underlying total magnetic susceptibility
sources in a voxel (2). In MS lesions, removal of diamagnetic degraded myelin
debris and iron accumulation both increase susceptibility measured on
QSM (3). QSM can help identify myelin and iron content changes during an
MS lesion’s lifetime. The aim of this study was to combine myelin water fraction (MWF) imaging and QSM to
investigate the sensitivity of QSM to detect myelin pathology in the tissue
immediately surrounding MS lesions.
Methods
Imaging experiment: Eight MS patients scanned on 3T GE scanner (HDxt
16.0) using 8-channel phased array coil
from February to March 2015 were shortlisted from our ongoing database. All
patients had a Fast Acquisition with Spiral Trajectory and T2prep (FAST-T2),
which provides high quality reproducible MWF and GRE images. QSM maps
were reconstructed from a three dimensional T2* -weighted spoiled multi-echo
GRE sequence by using morphology-enabled dipole inversion (MEDI) method (4). Scanning
parameters: T2-FLAIR
(1.2x0.6x0.6mm) and FAST-T2 (1x1x5mm).FAST-T2
parameters and QSM parameters have been previously published (4, 5)
Post Processing and Data analysis: MWF maps were obtained by analyzing FAST-T2 data with our
Multi-Gaussian post-processing algorithm (5). MWF maps and T2-FLAIR was co-registered
to QSM magnitude using FSL’s linear FLIRT transformation (6). Specific T2 and
QSM lesions were defined on T2-FLAIR by trained neuro-radiologist. For each MS lesion,
the ROI created manually in 3D on both T2w and QSM. Refer to abstract # 5706 for a presentation
demonstrating that QSM volume exceeds that of T2. For this analysis, a new ROI was created to
represent the difference between QSM and T2 signals (QSM ROI - T2 lesion ROI) within
identified lesions. New ROI’s were designated as QSM_rim and T2_lesion. To
reduce error related to noise we removed T2 lesions that were smaller than 100
voxels and failed registration and QSM_rim lesions that were smaller than 25
voxels.
Results
We analyzed in total 8
subjects having 61 rim lesions. Out of these 61 lesions, 10 lesions were
excluded to meet our size criteria of minimum lesion size of 100 voxels. Figure
1 shows an example of a single slice of QSM, T2-FLAIR, and MWF map (top row)
before and after overlaying the lesion mask (bottom row). We can clearly see the
segmented T2_lesion ROIs and QSM_rim maps are well co-registered with each
imaging modality. In addition, it can be appreciated that a lesion on QSM
exceeds the volume of a T2 lesion. The average volume of the 51 T2_lesion was
258.24 mm3 and QSM_rim was 112.90 mm3. Two additional
lesions were further excluded given the QSM_rim ROI’s were smaller than 25
voxels. Table 1 shows mean (SD) values of QSM_rim and T2_lesion ROI’s of the
remaining 49 lesions. The QSM of T2_lesions ROI’s (28.84) was significantly
higher than the QSM_rim ROI (23.28), p<0.0001. The MWF of T2_lesion ROI’s (0.058) was
significantly lower than QSM_rim ROI (0.087), p<0.0001.
Discussion
We present a multi-modality
approach to the study of MS lesions. We
successfully co-registered each modality to demonstrate changes in QSM and MWF
beyond the boundaries of the conventional T2 lesion. The volume of QSM lesions exceeded
that observed on conventional T2 imaging Through our multi-modality imaging
approach, we were able to demonstrate that MWF, an indirect measure of myelin,
was higher in the QSM_rim ROI, suggesting that less demyelination was present
in the QSM rim, which is consistent with the observed decrease in
susceptibility. Importantly, the final MWF value, on average, was much lower
than our previously reported healthy control lesion-based white matter MWF
value (0.16) (7). In conclusion, the QSM
volume, which exceeds the T2 lesion volume, represents myelin damage and thus
is more sensitive to pathological tissue damage than conventional T2
imaging. More importantly, given that
iron changes also influence susceptibility, QSM represents a combined measure
of disease activity. We plan to further
explore the use of myelin water imaging to extract the contribution of iron and
myelin to the susceptibility signal change, which would then further advance
QSM as a biomarker for MS.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1]. Bruck et al. Ann Neurol. 1997;42(5):783-793.
[2].
Yi et al. MRM. 2014.
[3] Wisnieff et al. MRM. 2015;74:564-570
[4] Liu T et al. MRM. 2011;66(3):777-783.
[5] Raj A et al. PLoS One 2014 Jun 4;9.
[6] Jenkinson
et al. NeuroImage 2002;17:825; 17(2) 825:841.
[7] Vargas et al, Neuroimage
Clinical. 2015.