Santosh Kumar Yadav1, Georgia Vasileiou2, Anup Singh3, Elias R Melhem4, Ena Wang1, Francesco M Marincola1, Arijitt Borthakur5, and Mohammad Haris1
1Division of Translational Medicine, Sidra Medical and Research Center, Doha, Qatar, 2Department of Medical physics, University college of Landon, Landon, United Kingdom, 3Center for Biomedical Engineering, Indian institute of Technology, Delhi, India, 4Department of diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States, 5Center for Magnetic Resonance and Optical Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
Synopsis
We
evaluated the gender based differences in cortical thickness and structural
brain network connectivity in PD patients. Significantly
reduced cortical thicknesses and disrupted structural networks
connectivity appeared in PD males compared to PD females suggestive of more brain
tissue changes in PD males than PD females. These male-specific cortical
thickness changes and disrupted structural networks connectivity may contribute
to or derive from physiological and genetically differences between males and
females and may have significant implications in diagnosing and treating PD
among the gender.Introduction:
Parkinson’s
disease (PD) is a chronic and progressive neurological disorder affecting
movements, muscles control, balance, cognitive functions, depression and thus affecting
overall quality of life. These symptoms appear to have gender specific
directions in PD patients
1,2,3 however, specific factors that
contribute to gender disparities are not well known. Examining these
differences in various domains may be useful toward gender specific diagnosis
and treatment of PD patients. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been widely used to detect brain’s structural
and functional changes both in animal models of PD and clinically in human PD subjects
4,5,6.
MRI detected brain atrophy in multiple sites including cortical and subcortical
structures in PD patients
7,8. Knowing the fact that males and females PD patients have
different disease symptoms, progration and treatment outcomes
1,2,3,7,8,
hence, characterization of brain tissue changes and structural networks
connectivity in males and females PD patients during the disease progression is
crucial for the effective treatment of PD. So far no study is available that
characterizes the gender based changes in cortical thickness and structural
networks connectivity in PD patients.
Purpose:
In
the current study, we aim to investigate the gender-based differences on
cortical thickness and structural networks connectivity in PD patients.
Material and Method:
64 PD patients (43-male; female-21),
and 46 controls (12-male; female-34) were included in this study. With informed
consent all these subjects underwent standardized clinical assessment and whole
brain MRI. Accurate diagnoses of PD were made using UK Parkinson’s Disease
Society Brain Bank criteria for Parkinson’s disease. Whole brain MRI was
performed on a 1.5-Tesla Siemens Sonata clinical-scanner (Siemens Medical
Systems, Malvern, PA, USA) using a vendor-supplied head coil. T1-weighted 3D
images were acquired using magnetization prepared rapid acquisition
gradient-echo pulse sequence covering whole brain with TR/TE=3000ms/3.5ms,
slice thickness=1.2mm, FOV of 240×240mm
2 and 192 phase encode
steps, with flip angle=8°. High-resolution
T1-weighted 3D brain images were used to quantify the cortical thicknesses in
all subjects using well established FreeSurfer pipeline (v 5.3.0), as described
in detail elsewhere
9. For the
structural networks construction we used graph theory based analysis using GAT
software
10 that used the freesurfer derived metrix. For the
quality assessment we manually evaluated all processed data and make sure that
no brain areas were excluded from analyses. Similarly, gray, white, and pial
boundaries were also visually assessed, and if needed, edits were made to
correct misidentified brain sites. In most subjects, only minor edits were
required to remove non-brain areas after automatically detected skull strip
procedures.
Statistical analyses:
All the statistical
computations were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences
version 16.0. After
final processing, gray matter surface maps were smoothed using a Gaussian
kernel (FWHM, 15mm). Cortical thickness changes among different groups were
examined using a vertex-by-vertex general linear model, with regional cortical
thickness modeled as a function of groups, and age included as covariate in the
analysis (p<0.05, FDR). The statistical parametric maps and structural
networks were generated individually for both left and right hemispheres. For
the structural identification of various brain sites, clusters with significant
difference between groups were overlaid onto averaged inflated cortical surface
maps. A p-value
of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Results:
Male PD patients showed significantly reduced
cortical thickness in various brain regions compared to both female PD patients
and female controls (figure 1 A, and figure 2 B). No significant change in cortical
thickness was observed between control females and PD females, between control
males and PD males, and between control males and PD females. Structural
connectivity analysis showed disrupted structural networks connectivity in PD
males compared to both PD females and control females (figure 1 B, C; 2B).
Discussion:
Gender
differences on cortical thickness and structural networks connectivity appeared
in PD patients. Males are significantly affected than females, which is suggestive
of more brain tissue damage in PD males than PD females. Estrogen is an
important female hormone that regulates multiple functions including
neuroprotection and neurtrophic action in the brain
11, and this may
be the one of the reason for no obvious changes in cortical thickness as well
as brain connectivity in female PD patients. The brain structural network
efficiency has been shown to associated with cognitive index and
psychomotor speed
12. Presence of altered structural networks in PD
males than PD females and control females suggestive of more diminished cognitive,
visual, sensory and motor dysfunctions in PD males. These male-specific cortical
thickness changes and disrupted structural networks connectivity may contribute
to or derive from physiological and genetically differences between males and
females and may have significant implications in diagnosing and treating PD
among the gender.
Acknowledgements
Sidra
Medical and Research Center provides the work station to process the MRI data.References
(1)
Lubomski M, Louise Rushworth R, Lee W. Sex differences in Parkinson's disease. J Clin Neurosci. 2014;21:1503-6. (2) Miller IN, Cronin-Golomb A. Gender differences in Parkinson's disease:
clinical characteristics and cognition. Mov Disord. 2010;25:2695-703. (3) Haaxma CA, Bloem BR, Borm GF.
Gender differences in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg
Psychiatry. 2007;78:819-24.
(4). Pelled G, Bergman H, Goelman G. Bilateral overactivation of the
sensorimotor cortex in the unilateral rodent model of Parkinson's disease -a
functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Eur J
Neurosci 2002; 15: 389–94. (5). Haslinger B, Erhard P, Kämpfe N,
et al., Event-related functional
magnetic resonance imaging in Parkinson's disease before
and after levodopa. Brain. 2001;124:558-70. (6). Beyer MK, Janvin CC,
Larsen JP et al.,. A magnetic resonance
imaging study of patients with Parkinson's
disease with mild cognitive
impairment and dementia using voxel-based morphometry. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78:254-9.
(7). Lewis MM, Du G, Lee EY. The pattern of gray matter atrophy in Parkinson's
disease differs in cortical and subcortical regions. J Neurol. 2015;20. (8). de
Celis Alonso B, Hidalgo-Tobón SS. Magnetic Resonance Techniques Applied to the
Diagnosis and Treatment of Parkinson's Disease. Front Neurol. 2015;6:146. (9). Dale A.M., Fischl B., Sereno
M.I. Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface
reconstruction. NeuroImage 1999;9:179-194. (10). Hosseini SM1, Hoeft F, Kesler SR
GAT: a graph-theoretical analysis toolbox for analyzing between-group
differences in large-scale structural and functional brain networks. PLoS One. 2012;7:e40709.
(11). Brann DW, Dhandapani K, Wakade C, et
al.,. Neurotrophic and neuroprotective actions of estrogen:
basic mechanisms and clinical implications. Steroids. 2007;72:381-405. (12). Lawrence AJ, Chung
AW, Morris RG, et al., Structural network efficiency is associated with cognitive impairment in small-vesseldisease. Neurology. 2014;83:304-11.