Devashish Das1, Andor Veltien1, and Arend Heerschap1
1Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
Synopsis
buildup
Lactate is associated with mitochondrial and neuromuscular diseases.
Therefore, its methylene (CH2) and methyl (CH3) proton assignment is necessary
in the skeletal muscle. In particular for understanding mechanisms associated
with the skeletal muscle ischemia in rodents. Unambiguous detection of
lactate resonances in the ischemic and/or hypoxic rodent muscle remains
challenging, however, necessary for the assessment of treatment in the
dysfunctional muscle of transgenic animals.
In vivo lactate resonances remain hidden under lipid pool. However, by
tuning spinecho delays in the localized 2D proton correlation sequence we are able
to separate lactate CH2 and CH3 protons from the lipid resonances in the F1
dimension of the 2D-spectrum. Purpose
In vivo assignment of lactate remains ambiguous. However, unambiguous
visualization is necessary for understanding mechanisms associated with
skeletal muscle ischemia in rodents, and for the assessment of treatment in the
dysfunctional muscle of transgenic animals. In this study we address
unambiguous detection of lactate methylene and methyl groups in the ischemic
hindleg of mice, subjected to prolong ischemia. Using localized 2D proton
correlation spectroscopy [1-3] at ultra-highfield (UHf-P-COSY). Despite the
strong contribution of Bo inhomogeneity, in vivo we can unambiguously assign
(CH2) methylene and (CH3) methyl groups of lactate in the F1 dimension of
localized 2D spectra.
Methods
Ultra-highfield localized 2D proton correlation spectroscopy
(UHf-P-COSY) sequence (see Figure 1) was implemented on a Bruker Biospec (9cm
horizontal bore) MR system 11.7T using a home built ischemia setup. This setup
consists of a 31P three turn solenoid coil surrounded with a 1H Alderman-Grant
coil. B1 fields of both coils are perpendicular to one another, which prevents
coupling between both coils. At first we used (Bruker) NMRSim software for
simulating optimal spin echo times for lactate spin system at 11.7T (500MHz)
(see Figure 2). Next we obtained phantom spectra for 40mM fructose and 10mM
lactate solutions at room temperature (see Figure 3 and 4). Finally, we
acquired in vivo 2D-UHf-P-COSY
spectrum of the mouse hindleg subjected to 35 minutes ischemia. For in
vivo experiment optimal echo time was set to 88ms, which was efficient for
coherence transfer between lactate protons and for lipid suppression (Figure
5). All 2D spectra were processed and analysed using Bruker Topspin 2.1
software.
Results and Discussion
Excellent water suppression was achieved in all proton spectra. Figure 3
shows 40mM fructose spectrum dissolved in water. In this figure clear cross
peaks and diagonal peaks between J-coupled protons of fructose can be seen.
Chemical shift differences between protons allow their separation in the F1 and
F2 dimensions of the 2D spectrum. The 2D spectrum of fructose demonstrates
superior resolving power of 2D UHf-P-COSY. Figure 4 is the 2D-UHf-P-COSY
spectrum of the lactate, poor shimming reveals strong contribution of Bo inhomogeneity
on the diagonal and cross peak volumes. Although we used suboptimal echo
time for coherence buildup, despite, clear cross and diagonal peaks at 1.2 and
4.0 ppm between methyl (CH3) and methylene (CH2) protons can be seen. In Figure
5, the in vivo hindleg spectrum show distinct cross peaks for
CH2 and CH3 lactate protons, which now can be unambiguously assigned. Both
cross peaks have very similar intensity, which suggest significant levels of
lactate (mM) accumulates in the ischemic muscle.
Conclusions
At ultra-highfield (11.7Tesla), there is an advantage to detect
metabolites by exploiting increased chemical shift separation as well as high
SNR despite the strong Bo inhomogeneity. Localized UHf-P-COSY can be useful in
the assessment of metabolites in the resting and hypoxic hindleg of mice at
high temporal and spatial resolution.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1]Thomas et,al MRM, 26:58 (2001) [2] Blackband et.al JMR 79:184-189 (1988)
[3]
Braakman et.al ,MRM, 60:449-456(2008)