Nicole D Fichtner1,2, Ioannis Giapitzakis3, Nikolai Avdievich3, Anke Henning2,3, and Roland Kreis1
1Depts. Radiology and Clinical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland, 2Institute for Biomedical Engineering, UZH and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, 3Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tuebingen, Germany
Synopsis
Ultra high field
strengths offer the benefit of higher signal to noise ratio as well as improved
separation of metabolites in spectroscopy, which is beneficial for evaluating downfield
peaks. In the current work, the metabolite cycling technique is implemented at
9.4T in order to evaluate the downfield part of the human brain spectrum. The
9.4T spectra confirm the 3T findings on exchanging peaks, and indicate that the
higher field strength improves metabolite separation, allowing for better
quantification of exchanging peaks, which
is also of great interest for chemical exchange dependent saturation transfer
experiments.Introduction and Purpose
Ultra-high field
strengths offer the benefit of higher signal to noise ratio as well as improved
separation of metabolites in spectroscopy. This improvement is expected to enable
easier observation and characterization of metabolites that are on the
downfield side of the spectrum, as they are often more difficult to see and
separate at lower field strengths
[1,2]. In particular, the
downfield spectrum may provide information on metabolites that are not present
or not so easily separated upfield
[3,4],
and furthermore can provide information on exchanging species, which is of
great interest for chemical exchange dependent saturation transfer experiments.
In the current work, the metabolite-cycling technique
[5,6] is
implemented at 9.4T in order to evaluate the downfield part of the human brain
spectrum without water suppression, as well as to investigate any effects due
to exchange after water suppression.
Materials and Methods
Three healthy volunteers were scanned using a 9.4T Siemens whole-body
human MRI scanner and a four-channel transceiver array surface coil[7].
A 20x20x20mm3 region was selected in a mix of grey and
white matter at the back of the brain. A Siemens FASTERMAP B0 shimming
implementation was used prior to running metabolite-cycling scans. A 22ms
asymmetric adiabatic metabolite cycling pulse was applied in the TM period of a
STEAM sequence with TR/TE/TM=3000/8/45ms[8]. For each of the
volunteers, 256 averages were acquired for the non-water suppressed metabolite-cycling sequence, as well as 256 averages for the same sequence with a SODA
water suppression sequence[9] applied before STEAM, with an
acquisition time of 12.8min for each scan. In one volunteer, only 128 averages
were reconstructed as the other 128 showed motion artifacts. During the measurement, shots were stored individually; following acquisition, offline processing
was performed: spectral alignment, scaling, and eddy current correction using
the water reference signal; and averaging and coil combination.
Qualitative comparisons were also performed between the
current study’s data and previous data acquired at 7T (Philips Achieva) using a
conventional STEAM sequence with VAPOR water suppression for seven volunteers
(256 averages each, quadrature transceiver surface coil (Rapid Biomedical) at
TR/TE/TM = 4000/13/26ms[10].
Results
Non-water suppressed and water suppressed spectra from one
volunteer are shown in Fig. 1. The averages over our initial three volunteers’
spectra are shown in Fig. 2, along with the difference spectrum visualizing the
effect of exchange-related signal drop due to water suppression. Fig. 3 shows
the averages of water-suppressed spectra from 3 volunteers at 9.4T and from 7
volunteers at 7T.
Discussion
The spectra in Fig. 1 are representative of the data
acquired at 9.4T for all individuals, including peak separation and resolution;
the individual spectra show some increase in separation of metabolites compared
to 3T[1] and 7T (Fig. 3) and indicate differences between
non-suppressed and water-suppressed data.
The averaged spectra in Fig. 2 show clear differences between
water suppressed and non-water suppressed spectra due to chemical exchange of
protons between the respective molecules and water. The respective difference
spectrum indicates the most prominent exchanging peaks, which are similar to
the exchanging peaks determined at 3T when comparing to Ref.[1]. There is some
increased structure in the 8.2-8.5ppm region, both in the averaged spectra and
the difference spectrum, and the peak at 5.8ppm is much stronger than at both
lower field strengths (not expected to be fully accountable by differences in
water suppression pulse bandwidths); furthermore, the two peaks at 6.0 and
6.1ppm appear stronger and better separated at 9.4T. Overall, the 9.4T spectra
confirm the 3T findings on exchanging peaks, and improve slightly on metabolite
separation.
In Fig. 3, major differences are highlighted between field
strengths, in particular indicating peaks that are not as easily visible at 7T.
Some of these differences may be due to the shorter SODA water suppression
sequence used at 9.4T (130ms), compared to the VAPOR sequence (700ms). The longer
water pre-suppression delay in VAPOR may
well accentuate the exchange-related signal loss. However, the peak at
approximately 6.1ppm does not appear to be greatly affected by exchange at
9.4T, but still is not visible at 7T. The other difference between the data is
that the 9.4T data was collected in a voxel of mixed white and grey matter,
compared to the 7T data which is from mainly grey matter.
The current work is a preliminary investigation into further
elucidating the downfield part of the human brain spectrum and into measuring
effects of exchange at ultra-high field strengths, and indicates that the
higher field strength improves metabolite separation, allowing for better identification
and quantification of exchanging peaks.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Swiss National
Science Foundation (#320030_156952).References
1.
MacMillan
EL, Chong DGQ, Dreher W, Henning A, Boesch C, Kreis R. Magnetization exchange
with water and T1 relaxation of the downfield resonances in human brain spectra
at 3.0 T. Magn Reson Med 2011;65:1239-1246.
2.
Kreis
R, Boesch C, Vermathen P. Characterization of the downfield part of the human
cerebral 1H MR spectrum at 3T [abstract]. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 2006: 2636.
3.
Henning A, Fuchs A,
Boesch C, Boesiger P, and Kreis R. Downfield spectra at ultrahigh field
[abstract]. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 2008: 777.
4.
Govindaraju V, Young
K, Maudsley AA. Proton NMR chemical shifts and coupling constants for brain
metabolites. NMR Biomed 2000;13:129-153.
5.
Dreher W, Leibfritz D. New method for the
simultaneous detection of metabolites and water in localized in vivo 1H nuclear
magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:190–195.
6.
de Graaf RA, Sacolick LI, Rothman D. Water and
metabolite-modulated MR spectroscopy and spectroscopic imaging [abstract]. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 2006: 3063.
7.
Pfrommer A, Avdievich
N, und Henning
A. Four channel transceiver array for functional magnetic resonance
spectroscopy in the human visual cortex at 9.4T [abstract]. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 2014: 1305.
8.
Giapitzakis IA , Nassirpour S , Avdievich
N , Kreis R and Henning A. Metabolite cycled single voxel 1H
spectroscopy at 9.4T [abstract]. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 2015: 4696.
9.
Giapitzakis IA, Nassirpour
S, and Henning
A. Short duration water suppression using optimised flip angles (SODA) at
ultra high fields [abstract]. 32nd Annual Scientific Meeting ESMRMB 2015: 519, S401-S402.
10.
Fichtner ND,
Henning A, Zoelch N, Boesch C, and Kreis R. T2 estimation of downfield
metabolites in human brain at 7T [abstract]. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 2015: 745.