Macromolecule Suppressed GABA Editing using MEGA-SPECIAL Sequence with Spectral-spatial RF Pulse
Meng Gu1, Adam Kerr2, Ralph Hurd3, and Daniel Spielman1

1Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States, 2Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States, 3GE Healthcare, Menlo Park, CA, United States

Synopsis

MEGA PRESS has been used to edit the GABA resonance at 3ppm. Due to the wide transition bandwidth of the editing pulse, macromolecule resonances are coedited. To suppress macromolecule signals, a symmetric suppression method has been proposed resulting in reduced GABA signal. We present a new editing method by incorporating spatial and spectral selectivity into the SPECIAL refocusing RF pulses to achieve both GABA editing and macromolecule suppression. Phantom studies showed higher edited GABA signal compared with MEGA PRESS and 90% macromolecule suppression. In-vivo studies demonstrated significantly higher edited GABA signal compared with MEGA PRESS.

Purpose

Gamma-aminobutyric-acid (GABA) is the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the human brain and in-vivo measurement of GABA using magnetic resonance spectroscopy offers valuable information in understanding brain functions. Based on J-difference editing, MEGA PRESS [1], has been used to detect the GABA resonance at 3ppm. In order to achieve the maximum signal strength, the editing pulse is generally applied at 1.9ppm and 7.5ppm with an echo time of 68ms. However, due to the wide transition bandwidth of the editing pulse, macromolecule resonances are coedited, with the signal at 3ppm mostly contributed from lysine residues in macromolecules, whose 3ppm resonance is coupled with its 1.7ppm resonance. To suppress macromolecule signals, a symmetric suppression method has been proposed where the editing pulse is applied at 1.9ppm and 1.5ppm. The assumption of this method is that the macromolecule 1.7ppm resonances are equally affected from the editing pulses so that the partially edited resonances at 3ppm are cancelled out in the edited spectrum. Unfortunately, this method results in reduced GABA signal because the editing pulse applied at 1.5ppm partially inverts the 1.9ppm resonance even when longer and more selective editing pulses are used at a longer TE of 80ms [2].

Here, we present a new editing method by incorporating spatial and spectral selectivity into the refocusing RF pulses of the SPECIAL sequence with 1D ISIS based localization to achieve both GABA editing and macromolecule suppression. Because a single spin echo is used for localizaiton, longer pulses with narrower transition band can be used than the double spin-echo used in MEGA-PRESS . As shown in Figure 1, by using spectral-spatial refocusing RF pulses with narrow transition bandwidths, GABA resonance at 3ppm can be edited by refocusing ("ON" case)/not refocusing ("OFF" case) the 1.9ppm resonance. As the lysine 1.7ppm resonance is not refocused in either case, its resonance at 3ppm is suppressed in the edited spectrum.

Methods

A spectral-spatial 180° pulse with a linear-phase spectral filter was designed with a 2D inverse SLR approach to achieve refocusing with narrow transition bandwidth [3-5]. The variable-rate selective excitation (VERSE) algorithm was applied to reduce the peak B1 for each subpulse [6]. The final pulse used had a 66ms duration, 260Hz spectral bandwidth, 22Hz transition bandwidth and a 27µT peak B1. Pulse and gradient waveforms are shown in Figure 2.

RESULTS

A 50mM GABA phantom and a 50mM lysine phantom were built to test the GABA editing and macromolecule suppression. The spectral-spatial based editing sequence was compared with the MEGA PRESS with symmetrical suppression at TE/TR=80ms/2s, 16 averaging with a voxel size of 2.5x2.5x2.5cm. The MEGA PRESS editing pulses were applied at 1.9ppm and 1.5ppm while the spectral-spatial pulse frequencies were shifted by 30Hz. Spectra of the "ON" and "OFF" cases and the edited spectrum for the MEGA PRESS and spectral-spatial SPECIAL are shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4. Measured from the phantom experiments, the edited GABA signal using spectral-spatial PRESS is 24% higher than that using MEGA PRESS with symmetrical suppression. The MEGA PRESS achieved 88% lysine suppression while the spectral-spatial PRESS achieved 90% lysine suppression. The comparison of MEGA PRESS and spectral-spatial SPECIAL was performed on several human subjects with the same prescription as the phantom studies except for with 64 averaging at an acquisition time of 4:30 minutes. Shown in Figure 5 are the results from a representative 42-year-old healthy male subject. The measured GABA signal with spectral-spatial PRESS is 28% higher than with MEGA PRESS.

CONCLUSIONS

A new editing method based on spectral-spatial RF pulses was developed for GABA editing and macromolecule suppression. Phantom studies showed higher edited GABA signal compared with MEGA PRESS with symmetrical suppression and 90% lysine suppression. In-vivo studies demonstrated significantly higher edited GABA signal compared with MEGA PRESS with symmetrical suppression. In addition to more efficient editing of the GABA signal, the use of spectral-spatial RF pulses offers other valuable benefits of lipid suppression and improved spatial selectivity compared with MEGA PRESS.

Acknowledgements

Lucas foundation, GE Health Care, NIH P41 EB 015891.

References

[1] Mescher, M.M., et al. NMR Biomed, 11:266, 1998.

[2] Henry, PG., et al. MRM 45:517, 2001.

[3] Pauly, J., et al. MRM 29:776, 1993

[4] Kerr, A.B., et al. Proc. ISMRM p226, 2008

[5] Larson, P.E., et al. JMR 194(1):121 2008

[6] Larson, P.E., et al. Proc. ISMRM p3149, 2008

Figures

Fig1. GABA editing scheme using spectral-spatial pulses.

Fig2. Pulse and gradient waveforms of the spectral-spatial pulse.

Fig3. GABA/lysine spectra using MEGA PRESS.

Fig4. GABA/lysine spectra using spectral-spatial SPECIAL.

Fig5. In-vivo spectra using MEGA PRESS and spectral-spatial PRESS.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
3994