Synopsis
Magnetic field drift and subject motion during J-editing proton MRS scan will not only cause frequency and phase drifts in the spectrum but also
alter the linewidth and lineshape. When the linewidths/shapes of edit-on and
edit-off spectra do not match, the J-difference spectrum will have residue of
Cr peaks; even when edit-on/off spectra match each other, the linebroadening
and distortion will deteriorate the quality of the difference spectrum. In this study, we used
the partially suppressed water signals to match and to transform the edit-on and edit-off spectra so
as to improve the quality of the J-edited spectrum.Purpose
The
J-difference editing technique is widely used in the in vivo proton MR
spectroscopy for the detection of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA).
1,2
During the lengthy time for the edit-on and edit-off scans, which is typically
more than 13 minutes, B
0 drift and subject motion may happen.
3,4 This will not only cause frequency and phase drifts in the spectrum but also
alter the linewidth and lineshape of the spectra. When the linewidths/shapes of edit-on and
edit-off spectra do not match, the J-difference spectrum will have residue of
Cr peaks, overlapping with the edited GABA peaks; even when edit-on/off spectra match each other, the linebroadening
and distortion will deteriorate the quality of the difference spectrum. Frequency
and phase drift correction has been recently suggested
3,4, in
addition to the conventional spectral processing procedures. However, the mismatch of the edit-on and edit-off spectra and the lineshape distortion still remain. In this study, we used
the partially suppressed water signals to match and to transform the spectra so
as to improve the quality of the J-edited spectrum.
Methods
Data acquisition All data were acquired
on a 3 T scanner MR750 (General Electric
Healthcare, WI) running on DV24 system software and with an 8 channel
coil. Phantom experiments were performed on a standard
spectroscopic phantom without GABA (GE, MRS HD Sphere). The MRS data
were acquired using the commercial
J-editing sequence with PRESS localization (MEGA-PRESS).2 The
scan parameters are as follows: voxel size: 2 x 2 x 2 cm3, TR/TE = 68 ms,
spectral
width = 2000 Hz, spectral data points = 1024, number of scan excitation
= 256
x 2 (for edit-on and edit-off). In vivo experiments were performed on 3
healthy
subjects in comply with the Institutional Review Board. No deliberate
subject
motion was induced.
Data
processing The 8 channel MRS data were
combined for each of the individual scans, and the resultant signals
were frequency
and phase corrected. All edit-on or all edit-off scans were combined,
respectively, from which the partially suppressed water signals were
extracted.
The water signals were used to deconvolve and transform the spectra5,6:
$$S_{on}=S_{on}^0L/W_{on}$$
and
$$S_{off}=S_{off}^0L/W_{off}$$
where S0
is the original signal, W is water
signal, and L is the lineshape function. L was chosen as a Gaussian function with
linewidth equal to that of the water signal. For comparison
purposes, L was also chosen to be Won or Woff for $$$S_{off}$$$ or $$$S_{on}$$$, respectively. We refer this latter case as "match-only". Finally, the J-difference
spectrum was obtained. To facilitate
comparison, J-difference spectrum was also obtained using conventional
approach
without spectral deconvolution and lineshape transform.
Results
We
used signal to noise ratio of NAA as an indicator of spectral quality. The
results show that the improvement of the edited spectra of the proposed approach depends on the
degree of match between the original FIDs of edit-on and edit-off scans. When
the summed edit-on and edit-off spectra perfectly match each other, only the
“deconvolution + lineshape transform” can improve the quality of the difference
spectrum. When disagreement exists between them, both the “match-only” and
“deconvolution + lineshape transform” procedures can improve the quality of the
edited spectra (Table 1. N
1 is the noise in signal free region, and
N
2 is noise calculated around 3 ppm. See also Figure 1). Of the three in
vivo spectra processed by the proposed method, the ratio of NAA to N
1 increased by 21.85%, 17.32%, and 13.65%,
respectively. The increase of peak heights of Glx (glutamate + glutamine) and GABA was also clearly observed
(Figure 2).
Discussion
The
present results show that using partially suppressed water signals to
deconvolve the spectra can eliminate the differences between edit-on and
edit-off spectra and the lineshape transform can further improve SNR, thus
potentially benefiting the detection of GABA and Glx. The performance of the
proposed approach depends on several factors: (1) water residual, which should
not be too small; otherwise the estimated water signal is affected by noise;
(2) accurate modeling of the water signal, which was achieved by an singular
value decomposition based method
7, and (3) the lineshape and decay rates in
lineshape transform, which were chosen as Gaussian lineshape that has lower Cramer-Rao Lower Bounds than Lorentzian
5 and with the same
linewidth as the water signal, respectively.
Conclusion
Partially
suppressed water signal can be used to deconvolve the J-editing proton MRS
signals and thus, together with lineshape transform, can improve the quality of
the spectrum. Further study will focus on the quantitative aspects of the
proposed method.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Rothman, D.L., et al., Localized 1H NMR measurements of gamma-aminobutyric acid in human brain
in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1993. 90(12): p. 5662-5666.
2. Mescher, M., et al., Simultaneous in vivo spectral editing and
water suppression. NMR Biomed, 1998. 11(6):
p. 266-72.
3. Near, J., et al., Frequency and phase drift correction of
magnetic resonance spectroscopy data by spectral registration in the time
domain. Magn Reson Med, 2014.
73(1):
p. 44-50.
4. Andrews-Shigaki, B.C., et al., Prospective motion correction for magnetic
resonance spectroscopy using single camera Retro-Grate reflector optical
tracking. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2011. 33(2):
p. 498-504.
5. Dong, Z., Proton MRS and MRSI of the brain without water suppression. Prog
Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc, 2015. 86-87:
p. 65-79.
6. Klose, U., In vivo proton spectroscopy in presence of eddy currents. Magn
Reson Med, 1990. 14(1): p. 26-30.
7. Hua, Y. et. al., Matrix pencil method for estimating parameters of exponentially damped/undamped sinusoids in noise. Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on, 1990. 38(5): p. 814-824.