Song-I Lim1,2, Kyu-Ho Song1, Chi-Hyeon Yoo1,2, Dong-Cheol Woo2, and Bo-Young Choe1
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, and Research Institute of Biomedical Engineering, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 2Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Synopsis
Nicotine effects the activation of nicotinic
acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) in multiple areas of the brain. Varenicline is a partial agonist acting at the α4β2 nAChRs. The purpose of the study is to compare
the in vivo effects of nicotine and
varenicline that contribute to the reward system. The results show the tendency
of increased Glu level in nicotine group. Moreover, GSH and NAA levels tended
to decrease in the nicotine group. It satisfies that high resolution and short
TE component adequately spilt the overlapped metabolite spectra and quantify
the cerebral neurochemicals. We found that varenicline effectively inhibits the
reward cycle.Purpose
Nicotine is very toxic and addictive substance that
humans are exposed to by daily smoking, but it is a preventable risk to human
health. Nicotine exerts its effects through the activation of nicotinic
acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) in multiple areas of the brain such as the hippocampus,
amygdala, and prefrontal cortex.
1 Varenicline is used as a smoking cessation aid and is
a partial agonist acting at the α4β2 nAChRs. Varenicline was developed based on the hypothesis
that a partial agonist would help smokers quit smoking by blocking the effect
of nicotine.
2 Thus, it would be interesting to compare the
in vivo effects of nicotine and
varenicline that contribute to the reward system. However, the influence of nicotine
and varenicline on hippocampal neurochemical changes has not been
experimentally investigated yet. We therefore studied the effects of repeated
nicotine exposure and varenicline administration on neurochemical changes by
using
in vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (
1H MRS) at
9.4T.
Materials and Methods
Eight-week-old male Wistar rats (n = 11; mean body
weight, 304.9 ± 9.9 g; range, 290.1–323.21 g) were divided into 3 groups:
control rats (control, saline injection, n = 3); nicotine-induced rats (nicotine,
subcutaneous injection of nicotine, 0.4 mg/kg/day free base, n = 4); and nicotine-
and varenicline-induced rats (varenicline, subcutaneous injection of nicotine,
0.4 mg/kg/day free base, intraperitoneal injection of varenicline 0.3 mg/kg/day
free base, n = 4). The 8 rats in the nicotine and varenicline groups received a
dose of 0.4 mg/kg nicotine subcutaneously once a day for 5 days and the varenicline
group received a dose of 0.3 mg/kg varenicline intraperitoneally 30 min before
the last nicotine injection on day 5.
3 The 3 rats in control group
received an equivalent volume of saline. On day 5, the rats were anaesthetized
by inhalation of mixture of air and O2 containing 1–2% isoflurane
after induction in a pre-anesthesia box with mixture of air and O2
containing 5% isoflurane. Then, ¹H MRS was performed on 9.4T Agilent MR scanner
approximately 1 h after the last injection. A axial and coronal T2 weighted images
(T2WI) was acquired with the following parameters: repetition time (TR) = 4000 ms,
echo time (TE) eff = 32.95ms, field of view (FOV) = 3 cm × 3 cm, flip angle of
90º, slice thickness = 1.5 mm, matrix: 256 × 256. After the image acquisition,
in vivo ¹H MRS were acquired in the voxel (1.5 × 2.5 × 3 mm³) mainly containing
hippocampus using point-resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) sequence and T2WI for
anatomical guidance with the following parameters : TR = 5000 ms, TE = 13.4 ms,
256 averages. The linear combination of model spectra (LCModel, version 6.3,
Stephen W. Provencher) fitting software was used to
quantify the metabolites in the frequency domain by using the basis metabolites.
Results
Fig 1 shows (A) axial and (B) coronal view of the rat
brain and voxel plan. Fig 1(C-E) shows representative spectra obtained from the
hippocampus regions of the 11 rats from the three groups (C: control, n = 3; D:
nicotine, n = 4; E: varenicline, n = 4) respectively. Fig 2 illustrates the
cerebral metabolite levels quantified from the 11 rats acquired in vivo spectra
from the hippocampus region. The vertical lines on each of the bars indicate
the (+) standard deviation of the mean values. Table 1 shows the mean values of
the in vivo metabolite concentrations
(μmol/g ± standard deviation [SD])
in the hippocampus of the rat brain with the
Cramer-Raw low bound (CRLB) values.
Discussion and Conclusion
In summary, the present study conducted in vivo
1H MRS in a rat model
to determine the influence of repeated nicotine treatment on neurochemical in
the rat hippocampus and the efficacy of varenicline on repeated
nicotine-induced rats. In this study, the results show the tendency of
increased glutamate (Glu) level in nicotine group than in the control and varenicline
groups. Moreover, glutathione (GSH) and N-acetylaspartate (NAA) levels tended to decrease in the nicotine group
in comparison with those in the control and varenicline groups. These findings indicate
that the hippocampus is integrally linked to the brain reward sensitization involved
in addiction and Glu release through mobilization of intracellular calcium
stores.
4 Further, oxidative stress and toxicity of nicotine on brain
would cause the decline tendency of GSH and NAA.
5 It satisfies that
high resolution and short TE component adequately spilt the overlapped
metabolite spectra and quantify the cerebral neurochemicals. In conclusion, we found
that varenicline effectively inhibits the reward cycle.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by grants (2012-007883) from
the Mid-career Researcher Program through the National Research Foundation
(NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (MSIP) of
Korea. This research was supported by a grant of the Korea Health Technology
R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute
(KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea
(grant number: HI14C1135).References
1. Akkurt D, Akay YM, Akay M. Investigating the synchronization of hippocampal neural network in response to acute nicotine exposure. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2010;7:31.
2. Zaniewska M, McCreary AC, Stefanski R, et al. Effect of varenicline on the acute and repeated locomotor responses to nicotine in rats. Synapse. 2008;62(12):935–939.
3. Calderan L, Chiamulera C, Marzola P, et al. Sub-chronic nicotine-induced changes in regional cerebral blood volume and transversal relaxation time patterns in the rat: A magnetic resonance study. Neurosci Lett. 2005;377(3):195–199.
4. Feduccia AA, Chatterjee S, Bartlett SE. Neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: neuroplastic changes underlying alcohol and nicotine addictions. Front Mol Neurosci. 2012;5:1–18.
5. Doan BT, Autret G, Mispelter J, et al. Simultaneous two-voxel localized 1H-observed 13C-edited spectroscopy for in vivo MRS on rat brain at 9.4 T: Application to the investigation of excitotoxic lesions. J Magn Reson. 2009;198(1):94–104.