31P MRS Signal-to-Noise Ratio in Human Brain at 3, 7, and 9.4 Tesla Using Dual Tuned Head RF Coils
Marek Chmelik1,2, Diana Bencikova3, Christian Mirkes4, Christopher T. Rodgers5, Gunamony Shajan4, Klaus Scheffler4,6, Siegfried Trattnig1,2, and Wolfgang Bogner1

1High Field MR Centre, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 2Christian Doppler Laboratory for Clinical Molecular MR Imaging, Vienna, Austria, 3Department of Nuclear Physics and Biophysics, Faculty of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia, 4High-Field MR Center, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tuebingen, Germany, 5OCMR, RDM Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 6Department for Biomedical Magnetic Resonance, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany

Synopsis

The purpose of this study was to quantitatively compare the SNR of brain 31P-MRS coils capable of covering the whole brain at various B0 field strenghts. SNR was compared using phantoms and in vivo in clinically acceptable measurement times at 3T (birdcage), 7T (23ch-array) and 9.4T (27ch-array). Data showed approximately 3-fold higher SNR at 7T than at 3T. 9.4T provided an additional -more than linear- increase. WSVD coil combination outperformed Brown’s coil combination. Especially with the 7T coil the necessity of advanced coil combination algorithms is apparent.

Purpose/Introduction

31P-MRS provides unique information on brain energy and membrane metabolism in vivo. Alterations in brain high-energy and membrane phosphate metabolism were reported in subjects with a number of brain disorders including major depression, schizophrenia, substance abuse and tumors1. The major limitation of brain 31P-MRS is low signal sensitivity at clinical scanners and from that resulting long acquisition times. Nowadays, several-fold higher SNR is available by using ultra-high field human whole-body MR scanners. Additional SNR may be gained by the use of receive arrays and advanced coil combination methods (e.g. whitened singular value decomposition – WSVD)3. This was recently demonstrated at 7T with a 7-channel receive array covering mostly the occipital lobe and WSVD coil combination2. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively compare the SNR of brain 31P-MRS coils capable of covering the whole brain at various B0 field strenghts. SNR was compared using phantoms and in vivo in clinically acceptable measurement times at 3T (birdcage), 7T (23ch array) and 9.4T (27ch array).

Subjects and Methods

Data were acquired on a 3T, 7T and 9.4T MR systems (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen) using double-tuned coils (1H/31P): at 3T a birdcage coil (RAPID Biomedical GmbH, Rimpar, Germany), at 7T a 23-channel receive array (QED-Quality Electrodynamics, Mayfield, OH, USA) and at 9.4T a 27-channel receive array (Max Planck Institute,Tuebingen, Germany) with the same design as in4. A point source 1cm3 cube (1M KH2PO4) submerged in a 2l cylinder filled with tap water (Fig.1A) and a 2l spherical phantom (10mM KH2PO4) were scanned at all field strengths. Fully relaxed pulse-acquire FIDs were acquired with variable pulse amplitude. Pulse amplitude with maximal signal was used for SNR analysis. Both, identical spectral widths (SW=7kHz at each fieldstrenght) to exclude the confounding effect of SW on the overall SNR (inversely proportional to square root of SW) and identical chemical shift ranges (in ppm unit, e.g. 2.2kHz,5.2kHz,7kHz for 3T, 7T and 9.4T) for more practical comparision of SNR were applied.Additionally a homogeneous spherical phantom was scanned with a fully relaxed (TR 30s) 12x12x12 MRSI sequence with 45º and 90º to allow local SNR comparison and dual flip angle B1 mapping.

In vivo measurements were performed on three healthy volunteers (age 32.6±3.2 years). MRSI scans at all field strengths were performed within two weeks with the following parameters: 8x8x8 matrix, FOV 20x20x20cm3, TR=1.5s, NA=16, weighted acquisition, block pulse 500us, Ernst FA=45,50,53º acording to published T1 times5 for optimal SNR/t1/2 at each field strength, TA=11min, identical chemical shift ranges in ppm unit (e.g. SW=2.2kHz,5.2kHz,7kHz for 3T, 7T and 9.4T). The acquired SNR was defined as the ratio between the amplitude of first FID point (AMARES fit) and the standard deviation (SD) of the noise of last 200 points in the unfiltered FID. For the in vivo data 4 voxels from each volunteer and each scan were quantified (Fig.3 B – green box).

Results

Fig.1. shows results of the pulse-acquire experiments with point source 31P signal. Data shows approximately 2-fold higher SNR at 7T than at 3T. 9.4T provided an additional -more than linear- increase. WSVD coil combination outperformed Brown’s coil combination. Especially with the 7T coil the necessity of advanced coil combination algorithms is apparent. Pulse-acquire experiments with the spherical phantom show only approximately linear increase of SNR, which reflect the degraded B1 fields at higher field strengths and thus an inhomogenous 90° excitation. A representative transverse slices of the 3D 31P-MRSI data from one volunteer are displayed in Fig.2. Data are displayed after noise normalization and equivalent time domain filtering. Fig.3A displays representative spectra of one volunteer and shows average PCr SNR from all three volunteers (Fig.3D). Noticeable is also the improved spectral resolution in the PME-PDE (2-7ppm) and α-ATP, NADP, UDPG (-7- -9ppm) regions.

Discussion/Conclusion

The results show experimental evidence of a more than linear increase in SNR with field strength in human brain 31P-MRS. Although we analyzed the central region of the RF coils (i.e., the region that benefits least from using receive arrays), our data show the dramatic increase in spectral quality at ultra-high magnetic fields. Increased SNR may be used for decreasing scan time and/or for increasing spatial resolution of 31P-MRS. Data are in good agreement with previous studies5,6. However, the degraded B1 homogeneity pose new challenges, which may be overcome with adiabatic RF pulses as commonly used for 31P-MRS for surface coils.

Acknowledgements

CTR is funded by a Sir Henry Dale Fellowship from the Royal Society and the Wellcome Trust [098436/Z/12/Z].

References

1. Arias-Mendoza et al. Dis Markers. 2003-2004;19(2-3):49-68;

2. van de BankNMR Biomed. 2015 Nov;28(11):1570-8;

3. Rodgers et al. MRM 2015 Mar 28. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25618;

4. G. Shajan al. MRM 2015 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25666;

5. Lu et al. NMR Biomed. 2014 Sep; 27(9): 1135–1141.;

6. Pohmann et al. Magn Reson Med. 2015 Mar 29. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25677

Figures

Fig.1. Shows results of pulse-acquire experiments with point source 31P signal (1cm3 cube at the end of the stick). (A) Photo of the phantom; (B) FID comparision after noise normalization; (C) frequency domain after noise normalization; (D) graphical time-domain SNR comparision, gray bars indicate extra SNR at lower fields due to the receiver bandwidth needed to cover the same spectral region in ppm.

Fig.2. Transverse slice of 8x8x8 31P MRSI from one volunteer acquired at 3T, 7T and 9.4T field strengths. Noise level is normalized in all examples.

Fig.3. Sample spectra of in vivo experiments. (A) Representative spectra from one volunteer (red box in B). (C) Average time domain SNR of PCr from 3 volunteers. 4 central spectra (green box in B) from each scan were used for analysis.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
3981