Synopsis
Up to now only a few 23Na
abdominal MRI studies have been performed at 7T. In this work, a versatile 23Na
transceive elliptical-shaped body coil for 7T with a large FOV and a high transmit/receive efficiency was designed, simulated, and implemented on a 7T scanner. The setup was
applied for in-vivo imaging of the human torso. The obtained 3D 23Na image data
set contains 23Na signals from heart to pelvis. High regional 23Na signals are especially
present in the areas of kidney, liver, cartilage, vessels, vertebral disks,
spinal canal, and heart.Introduction
Over the last decades sodium (
23Na) MRI has evolved into a valuable
biomedical application which can give additional information about the stage of
a disease or about therapy response
1. Only a few
23Na
abdominal MRI studies have been performed at 7T, mostly using radiofrequency (RF)
coils constructed for special applications with a medium field of view (FOV)
2,3.
In this work, a versatile
23Na RF transceive body coil with a large
FOV and a high transmit/receive efficiency was designed, simulated, and implemented on a 7T scanner. B
1+-maps inside a
phantom were obtained from RF simulations and measurements to evaluate coil
efficiency. Subsequently, the setup was applied for in-vivo imaging of the human
torso.
Methods
Hardware design:
A close-fitting
low-pass elliptical birdcage coil was designed that provides a high filling
factor and allows positioning in the isocenter of the MR scanner (Fig.1a). For comfortable
subject positioning, the birdcage is separated into two halves (Fig.1b).
Cylindrical quadrature
birdcage coils provide the advantage of a circularly polarized B1+-field. In an
elliptical birdcage rotational symmetry is violated, making the generation of a
circularly polarized B1+-field challenging.
To improve
quadrature performance of the elliptical birdcage, legs were spaced 360°/12=30°
apart around the periphery of the ellipse4. Due to the split design,
the left and right feeding legs of the birdcage were shifted to the upper half (Fig.1b),
resulting in an additional violation of symmetry.
Four feeding
ports (top, left, bottom, right) were implemented that enable manipulation of
amplitude and phase at four legs. For preliminary measurements and simulations,
equal amplitudes and phase differences of 0°, -90°, -180°, and -270° were applied.
In further studies, B1+-homogeneity can be improved by applying optimized phase and
amplitude settings.
Coil simulations:
RF simulations were performed in CST
Studio Suite 20155. B1+-maps were calculated for a
phantom (εr’=54 , σ=0.43S/m at 78.6MHz, 23Na-content: w(NaCl)/wges=1.8%).
A heterogeneous male body model (34y, 1.77m, 72.4kg)6
was used to obtain specific absorption rates (SAR) for in-vivo application.
Imaging:
Measurements were performed on a MAGNETOM 7T system7. Images were
acquired using a density-adapted 3D radial sequence (DA-3DPR)8. Image
reconstruction and post-processing were performed in MATLAB9.
B1+-maps inside the phantom were obtained using the dual
angle method10.
Sequence parameters: Nominal isotropic
resolution=10mm, reconstructed FOV=(400 mm)3, FA: α1=55°, α2=110°,
tpulse(55°)=1ms, tpulse(110°)=2ms, TE/TR=(1.05ms/250ms),
#projections=10000, TAQ(per sequence)=41min40s.
High-resolution 3D in-vivo 23Na image data of the human torso of a free-breathing
healthy volunteer (26y, 1.80m, 75kg) were obtained. The maximum
time-averaged input power of the RF coil was determined from the simulated SAR
in the heterogeneous body model.
Sequence
parameters: Nominal isotropic resolution=4mm, reconstructed
FOV=(304mm)3, FA: α=44°, tpulse=2ms, TE/TR=(1.05ms/20ms),
#projections=18200, avg=5, TAQ=30min20s.
Results
Phantom study:
Simulated and measured B1+-maps correspond very well (Fig.2). Mean B1+ and
standard deviation (SD) determined in the delineated ROI are 12.2µT (SD=1.4µT) in
simulation and 14.1µT (SD=1.4µT) in measurement. B1+-homogeneity can further be improved by applying optimized phases. First simulations (Fig.3) with optimized phases (0°, -73°, -180°, -287°)
demonstrate a B1+-distribution which is symmetric with respect to the coil
center. Additionally, mean B1+ increases (14.3µT) and SD decreases (1.1µT)
compared to the standard phase settings.
In-vivo study:
Fig.4
shows exemplary slices of a high-resolution 3D 23Na image data set of the human
torso. The large FOV of (304mm)3 covers a region from heart to pelvis.
High regional 23Na signals are especially present in the areas of kidney,
liver, cartilage, vessels, vertebral disks, spinal canal, and heart. 23Na
signal distribution of left kidney in Fig.4a-c indicates great potential of
23Na MRI to characterize renal physiology. Although the heart is located at the
outer part of the FOV, the left and right ventricles can be discriminated in
time-averaged 23Na signal distributions (Fig.4d-e).
Discussion and conclusion
Simulated and measured mean B1+ correspond very well with the target value
of 13.57µT (FA=55°). Values of B1+ standard deviations are in an acceptable
range. B1+-maps show the expected non-uniformity due to the asymmetry of this
elliptical birdcage with two vertically shifted feeding legs. For further
studies, B1+-uniformity can be improved by adjusting the phase differences
between the feeding ports.
High-resolution
23Na images show the great potential of 23Na MRI at 7T. The developed body coil
especially offers the possibility to examine 23Na signal distribution at 7T in
organs of the human torso like heart, breast, liver, kidney, and prostate. Additionally,
retrospective gating can be used to separately reconstruct different phases of
cardiac cycle or respiratory motion11.
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the Helmholtz Alliance ICEMED - Imaging and Curing Environmental Metabolic Diseases, through the Initiative and Networking Fund of the Helmholtz Association.References
1) Madelin G and Regatte RR. Journal
of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 38.3: 511 (2013)
2) Graessl A, et al. Journal of Cardiovascular
Magnetic Resonance 15: W14 (2013)
3) Moon CH, et al. European
Radiology 24.6: 1320 (2014)
4) Kurczewski R, et al. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med: 4025 (1992)
5) CST AG,
Darmstadt, Germany
6) Christ A, et al. Physics Med Biol 55(2): N23 (2010)
7) Siemens
Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany
8) Nagel AM, et al. Magnetic Resonance in Medicne 62: 1565 (2009)
9) The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, USA
10) Insko EK and Bolinger L. Journal of Magnetic Resonance, Series A, 103: 82 (1993)
11) Resetar A, et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 33.9: 1091 (2015)