Synopsis
C57BL/6J mice widely used in preclinical research exhibit sporadic congenital
portosystemic shunts that prevent normal delivery of nutrients and hormones to
the liver. We used MRI to diagnose portosystemic shunts in mice, and
furthermore showed that their hepatic lipid content, as determined by 1H-MRS in vivo is abnormally high. Also,
compared with healthy cage mates, mice with portosystemic shunts displayed
lower fasting glucose and insulin levels, with a less efficient glucose
clearance after a glucose gavage. Hence, hepatic metabolism is significantly
altered in mice with portosystemic shunts with consequences to whole-body
glucose homeostasis.Introduction
The incidence of congenital portosystemic shunts (PSS) in widely used
C57BL/6J mice is associated with cerebral glutamine accumulation
1,2
resulting from inefficient ammonia detoxification by the liver. In the presence
of this vascular abnormality, portomesenteric blood bypasses the liver and
drains directly to the systemic circulation. Under normal conditions, the liver
receives nutrient- and hormone-rich portal blood, participating in the
maintenance of fuel homeostasis. For example, the liver alone accounts for the
uptake of about one third of an oral glucose load
3 and extracts over
one half of portal insulin
4. Therefore, portosystemic shunting may
have an important impact not only in blood detoxification, but also in
liver-mediated metabolic control. In this study, we aimed at using high
resolution gradient echo (GRE) MRI to visualize portosystemic shunts in mice.
Moreover, we investigated eventual alterations in intra-hepatic metabolites by
localized
1H-MRS
in vivo and in
whole-body metabolism by evaluating glucose tolerance.
Methods
11-week old male C57BL/6J mice, directly obtained from the Charles Rivers
Laboratories (France) were scanned in the supine position under isofluorane
anesthesia (1-2% in air:oxygen 50:50 mixture) with a
1H quadrature
surface coil (two 13 mm-inner-diameter physically decoupled loops) over the
abdomen, in a 14.1 T-26 cm magnet interfaced to a Direct Drive console (VnmrJ,
Agilent Technologies). Breathing rate and body temperature were monitored
through an MR-compatible system, which also delivered respiratory gating
signals for all MR acquisitions. Anatomical multi-slice GRE images of the liver
were acquired in the coronal orientation (FOV = 25×25 mm
2, RO×PE = 256×192, TE = 5.2 ms, TR = ~600 ms when the respiration rate is
100 beats-per-minute, 30×0.3 mm slices without any gap, 8 averages). Among these mice, we detected 4 mice with abnormal
liver images, in which we also confirmed the presence of high cerebral
glutamine content, in the range of 5.6-8.6 mmol/g
from the dorsal hippocampus, twice the value of source- and age-matched
controls: 1.9-3.6 mmol/g (n=6, including
two litter-mates). Based on the evidence of high cerebral glutamine associated
with PSS
1, these mice are hence-after designated PSS-mice.
For both PSS- and control-mice, water T
2
was calculated from localized
1H-MR spectra obtained from a 8 µl
voxel confined to the hepatic parenchyma with STEAM (TM = 20 ms; TR = 6.5 s; 32
scans), by mono-exponential fit of the signal decay with increasing TEs (5, 8,
10, 15, 20, 25, 30 ms). Hepatic lipid content (HLC) was also
calculated from those spectra and expressed as the area of the bulk of
methylene protons in hepatic fatty-acyl chains relative to that of the
methylene protons plus water, with corrections for T
2. An oral
glucose tolerance (OGTT) test was performed after a 6-h fasting. Glucose was
monitored with a glucometer from tail tip samples before the glucose gavage
(1.5 g/kg) and hence after until 2h. Fasting insulin was measured by ELISA
immunoassay.
Results and Discussion
Within approximately 15 minutes, GRE images were acquired with minimal
motion artifacts and allowed the successful identification of PSS in mice
(Figure 1). Maximum width and length of vascular shunts were calculated to be 2.9±0.1 mm and 1.1±0.2 mm, respectively. PSS-mice showed a different GRE
image contrast when compared to controls (Figure 1) but hepatic water T
2
was 8.3±0.4 ms, similar to that found in control mice
5. PSS-mice also showed increased HLC (Figure 2) and altered glucose homeostasis
(Figure 3). Compared with controls, mice with PSS displayed lower fasting glycemia and insulinemia and hampered glucose clearance during the OGTT. These
metabolic abnormalities are consistent with defects in hepatic glucose
metabolism secondary to the lack of exposure to glucose itself and pancreatic
hormones. Namely, portosystemic shunting would prevent glucagon-stimulated hepatic
glucose production in the fasted state, and insulin-mediated hepatic actions
that contribute to lower blood glucose upon the oral glucose load: stimulation
of glycogen synthesis
6 and inhibition of glucose output
7.
Our findings are in agreement with observations in humans reporting a deterioration of oral glucose tolerance in cirrhotic patients after portosystemic shunting
8.
Together with increased levels of hepatic lipids, impaired hepatic glucose
metabolism, suggests a metabolic shift in fuel homeostasis, in favor of lipid
utilization. In conclusion, we demonstrate that high resolution GRE MRI can be
used to diagnose portosystemic shunts in mice; portosystemic shunting impacts
intra-hepatic energy stores leading to hepatic lipid accumulation, and hampers
the participation of the liver in the control of glucose homeostasis. In the
long term, this hepatic metabolic shift may have deleterious consequences on
both liver health and whole-body fuel homeostasis.
Acknowledgements
Supported by the
Centre d’Imagerie BioMédicale (CIBM) of the UNIL, UNIGE, HUG, CHUV, EPFL and
the Leenaards and Louis-Jeantet FoundationsReferences
1. Cudalbu
C et al. PLoS ONE 2013 ; 8: e69782
2. Tkac
I. Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 2015; 23: 1980
3. Cherrington
AD. Diabetes. 1999; 48: 1198
4. Jaspan
J and Polonsky K. J Clin Invest. 1982; 69: 516
5.
Soares AF et al. NMR Biomed. 2015 ; 28: 1009
6.
Jin
ES et al. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278:28427
7.
Smadja
C et al. Am J Physiol. 1988; 254: E407
8. Pezzarossa A et al. Diabete Metab. 1986; 12: 197