Natalie Korn1, Susan Noworolski1, Linda Nix2, Kyle Tillinghast1, and Phyllis Tien3,4
1Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States, 2Northern California Institute for Research and Education, San Francisco, CA, United States, 3University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States, 4Department of VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, United States
Synopsis
The purpose of this
work is to compare differences in visceral fat volume (by IDEAL imaging) and hepatic fat fraction
(FF) (by single-voxel MRS) between African American (AA) and Caucasian (CA) men with HIV, HCV, or
co-infection (HIV/HCV) against an age-matched control population. We observe AA men to have a trend
towards less MR-measured visceral fat and hepatic FF than CA men in a control
population. This difference was enhanced and was significant in the HIV
population, while there was no observable difference in the HCV or HIV/HCV
populations, indicating a need to consider both race and disease status prior
to interpretation of visceral or hepatic FF findings. Purpose
As the
projected survival time of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C (HCV)
increase, long-term systemic effects of these diseases and their treatments
remain an active area of research
1. Particularly in the HIV
population, which is predisposed to infection, imaging can play an important
role in monitoring these effects. Racial differences in visceral fat and
hepatic fat fraction (FF) are known
2,3, however a need exists to determine if these
differences vary in patients with common chronic diseases. The purpose of this
work is to compare differences in visceral fat volume and hepatic FF between African American (AA) and Caucasian (CA) men with HIV, HCV, or
co-infection (HIV/HCV) against an age-matched control population.
Materials and Methods
We
measured visceral fat at three vertebral disc levels (L23, L34, L45) with 3T
MRI [3-slice average fat volume (cc) from axial IDEAL, FOV=50x50 cm, 10 mm
slices, NEX=0.5], and calculated fat
volume using a semi-automatic contour-based segmentation by a single observer. We measured hepatic FF by MRS, FF = Fat / (Fat + Water),
using single-voxel PRESS [TR/TE=2500/30 ms, 20x20x20 mm, water suppressed
(NEX=64), unsuppressed (NEX=8)]. We compared differences in fat deposition in
the viscera and liver between AA and CA men with HIV, HCV, and HIV/HCV, and in
an age-matched control population, and included a homeostatic model assessment
of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) measurement to control for insulin resistance
2.
The breakdown of the 197 men studied was: Control-AA (n=38, mean age=53.0 ± 6.1);
Control-CA (n=33, mean age=51.2 ± 8.9); HIV-AA (n=13, mean age=55.6 ± 9.0); HIV-CA
(n=47, mean age=53.6 ± 8.2); HCV-AA (n=18, mean age=58.6 ± 3.1); HCV-CA (n=28, mean
age=57.2 ± 5.4); HIV/HCV-AA (n=8, mean age=56.5 ± 6.1); HIV/HCV-CA (n=12, mean
age=52.9 ± 5.7). Results were analyzed using a Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test due to
non-uniform distribution.
Results
There
were no adverse events reported during this study. Results by Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test are summarized in Table 1. In controls, AA men showed a
non-significant trend of less visceral fat (p<0.166), and less hepatic FF (p<0.204)
than CA men. In HIV, AA men showed significantly less visceral fat (p<0.028)
and significantly less hepatic FF (p<0.024) than CA men. In HCV, we see no
observable difference in visceral fat (p<0.827) or hepatic FF (p<0.511)
by race. In HIV/HCV, we also see no observable difference in visceral fat (p<0.873),
or hepatic FF (p<0.323) by race. There was no significant difference in
insulin resistance measured by HOMA-IR between any groups analyzed.
Discussion
MR
measurement of visceral fat volume by IDEAL imaging and of hepatic FF by single-voxel MRS show racial differences in fat storage vary significantly
in common chronic diseases. As the prevalence of metabolic syndrome increases
4,
this co-morbidity can affect physician decisions on medication. Ability to
judge abnormal fat deposition and the presence of metabolic syndrome is
dependent on knowledge of the population, which this work shows is
dependent on not only disease state but also ethnic group. Future work should
examine the differences between the populations presented, as well as
differences based on treatment history for chronic liver conditions, although
these studies require a larger population.
Conclusion
In this
study, we observed AA men to have a trend towards less MR-measured visceral fat
and hepatic FF than CA men in a control population. This difference was
enhanced and was significant in the HIV population, while there was no
observable difference in the HCV or HIV/HCV populations, indicating a need to
consider both race and disease status prior to interpretation of visceral or
hepatic FF findings.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Joshi, Deepak, et al. "Increasing burden
of liver disease in patients with HIV infection." The Lancet 377.9772 (2011): 1198-1209.
2. Guerrero, Richard, et al. "Ethnic
differences in hepatic steatosis: an insulin resistance paradox?." Hepatology 49.3 (2009): 791-801.
3. Nazare, Julie-Anne, et al. "Ethnic
influences on the relations between abdominal subcutaneous and visceral
adiposity, liver fat, and cardiometabolic risk profile: the International Study
of Prediction of Intra-Abdominal Adiposity and Its Relationship With Cardiometabolic
Risk/Intra-Abdominal Adiposity." The
American journal of clinical nutrition 96.4
(2012): 714-726.
4. Langan, Sinéad M., et al. "Prevalence of
metabolic syndrome in patients with psoriasis: a population-based study in the
United Kingdom." Journal
of Investigative Dermatology 132
(2012): 556-562.