Effects of lifestyle intervention on liver volume, intrahepatic fat and body weight:  What are the metabolic benefits?
Malte Niklas Bongers1, Norbert Stefan2, Andreas Fritsche2, Claus Claussen1, Hans-Ulrich Häring2, Konstantin Nikolaou1, Fritz Schick3, and Jürgen Machann3,4,5

1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany, 2Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism, Clinical Chemistry, Nephrology and Angiology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany, 3Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Section on Experimental Radiology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany, 4Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases (IDM) of the Helmholtz Center Munich at the University of Tübingen (Paul Langerhans Institute Tübingen), Tübingen, Germany, 5German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Tübingen, Germany

Synopsis

Using MRI, the quantification of liver volume and identification of several compartments of adipose tissue with varying impact on metabolism is reliably possible. 1H-MRS is established as non-invasive ‘gold standard’ to quantify the amount of ectopic lipids in the liver. Lifestyle interventions show differing effects on the compartments of physiological and ectopic lipids. Caloric restriction during lifestyle interventions leads to reduced liver volume, caused by a decrease of intrahepatic lipids (IHL). The decrease of IHL shows gender specific effects on liver enzymes, primarily resulting in lowered gamma-glutamyl transferase in females and lowered alanine transaminase in males. Only in females, the decrease of IHL seems to influence the systemic low-grade inflammation positively.

Purpose

Numerous MRI-studies of last years could identify different compartments of adipose tissue (AT) with varying impacts on metabolism [1-3]. The most important compartment seems to be visceral adipose tissue (VAT), which shows a strong association to insulin sensitivity and low grade inflammation [4]. Besides this, intrahepatic lipids (IHL) are involved in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance and several studies have proven the negative effect of increased IHL on insulin sensitivity [5]. To reduce the amount of AT in the different compartments, lifestyle interventions show promising results [6]. So far less is known about the effect of lifestyle intervention in terms of caloric restriction concerning the changes of liver volume, the amount of IHL and potentially connected effects on liver enzymes (Aspartate Transaminase = AST, Alanine Transaminase = ALT, Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase = GGT) and the subclinical low-grade inflammation. The aim of this study was to investigate potential associations between changes of liver volume, the amount of IHL and body weight during lifestyle interventions and to delineate potentially connected effects concerning changes of liver enzymes and the systemic low grade inflammation.

Material and methods

Participants of this study were retrospectively selected from prospective cohort studies, characterizing the risk of developing a type 2 diabetes mellitus. All participants followed a caloric restriction diet for 6 months. 66 females and 45 males, mean age 48 years (22–71 years) with an average body mass index (BMI) of 31 kg/m² (20-47kg/m²) were enrolled. The liver volume was determined at the beginning and after 6 months by three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (3D-MRI, gradient-echo, opposed-phase, partition thickness 5 mm; see figure 1 c) and IHL were quantified by volume-selective 1H-MRS (STEAM, TE/TR 10/4000ms, VOI 30x30x20mm³, 32 acq.; see figure 1 a and b). Anthropometric and metabolic data were assessed immediately after the MR examination. Blood samples were drawn to determine liver enzymes and the high sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) as surrogate for systemic low grade inflammation. Gender stratified univariable correlation analyses between changes of liver volume (ΔLV), intrahepatic lipids (ΔIHL), body weight (ΔBW), liver enzymes (ΔAST, ΔALT, ΔGGT) and CRP (ΔhsCRP) were performed.

Results

Correlation analysis showed strong associations between ΔLV and ΔIHL in females and males (females: r = 0.64, p = <.0001; males: r = 0.51, p = 0.0006) but no significant associations to ΔBW. In females, a significant correlation between ΔIHL and ΔGGT (r = 0.45, p = 0.0002) respectively ΔALT (r = 0.28, p = 0.02) but not with ΔAST was present. Males showed no significant correlation between ΔIHL and ΔGGT, but with ΔALT (r = 0.49, p = 0.0008) and ΔAST (r = 0.40, p = 0.008). In females, but not in males a significant association between ΔIHL and ΔCRP could be identified (females: r = 0.45, p = 0.0002).

Discussion

Several compartments of physiological and ectopic lipids with varying impact on metabolism were described by MRI studies. Beyond VAT, IHL seems to have a dominating effect in causing a prediabetic metabolism. Lifestyle interventions are favored to influence the different compartments of AT. So far, little is known about the effects of lifestyle interventions in detail. Our results, after six months of caloric restriction show the reversibility of augmented liver volume in steatosis if it is possible to reduce IHL during lifestyle intervention. Therefore, the aim of lifestyle interventions should focus on reducing the amount of IHL and not on body weight leading to a positive effect on liver volume. The connected effects by reducing IHL on liver enzymes and the low grade inflammation seem to be gender specific. Hence, judging the effectivity of lifestyle intervention has to be done with regard to differing effects on liver enzymes and low grade inflammation in women and men.

Conclusion

Changes of liver volume during lifestyle intervention are independent of changes of body weight and primarily determined by changes of IHL. Reduction of IHL seems to have gender-specific effects, mainly reducing GGT in females and ALT in males as well as having a positive effect in reducing the systemic low grade inflammation only in females. These results show the reversibility of augmented liver volume in steatosis and the resulting gender-specific benefits on metabolism.

Acknowledgements

The study was supported in part by grants from the DeutscheForschungsgemeinschaft (KFO 114), the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) to the German Centre for DiabetesResearch (DZD)

References

1. Rittig K, Staib K, Machann J et al (2008) Perivascular fatty tissue at the brachial artery is linked to insulin resistance but not to local endothelial dysfunction. Diabetologia 51:2093–20992.

2. Thamer C, Machann J, Bachmann O et al (2003) Intramyocellular lipids: anthropometric determinants and relationships with maximal aerobic capacity and insulin sensitivity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:1785–17913.

3. Thamer C, Machann J, Staiger H et al (2010) Interscapular fat is strongly associated with insulin resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95:4736–47424.

4. Thamer C, Machann J, Stefan N et al (2007) High visceral fat mass and high liver fat are associated with resistance to lifestyle intervention. Obesity (Silver Spring) 15:531–5385.

5. Stefan N, Kantartzis K, Machann J et al (2008) Identification and characterization of metabolically benign obesity in humans. Arch Intern Med 168:1609–16166.

6. Gallagher D, Heshka S, Kelley DE et al (2014) Changes in adipose tissue depots and metabolic markers following a 1-year diet and exercise intervention in overweight and obese patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 37:3325–3332

Figures

Figure1: a Axial T1-weighted MRI of the liver showing the H-MRS VOI placed in segment VII. b Representative H-MRS spectrum with characteristic H20- and lipid-peaks. c Representative slice and corresponding ROI of manual quantification of liver volume. VOI = volume of interest, ROI = region of interest, ppm = parts per million



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
3909