Synthesized versus acquired high b-value (1200 s/mm2) diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for detection of peripheral zone lesions in the prostate using PI-RADS version 2
Stephanie T. Chang1, Andreas M. Loening1, and Shreyas S. Vasanawala1

1Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States

Synopsis

Greater diffusion weighting is generally thought to increase performance of MRI for prostate cancer detection. We compared acquired high b-value (1200 s/mm2) diffusion-weighted MRI against b-1200 images synthesized from b ≤ 800 acquisitions for detection of peripheral zone lesions in the prostate for 50 consecutive patients undergoing prostate MRI and biopsy using two blinded independent readers. Although subjective image quality was rated slightly but significantly worse for synthesized DWI compared to acquired DWI images, no significant difference in detection of peripheral zone lesions, PI-RADS version 2 lesion categorization, or confidence scores of interpretation were observed.

PURPOSE

Synthesized high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging (sDWI) has been shown to be less prone to artifacts, avoid longer required echo times for high b-value acquisitions, and provide improved contrast to noise ratios for detection of prostate cancer compared to equivalent directly acquired high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).1,2,3,4 We examined whether sDWI for a b-value of 1200 s/mm2 provides similar image quality, detection of peripheral zone lesions in the prostate, and PI-RADS version 2 categorization, compared to acquired DWI for the same b-value.

METHODS

With IRB approval, fifty consecutive patients who underwent prostate MRI followed by biopsy were retrospectively identified. A multiparametric MRI protocol was performed for all patients on a 3.0 Tesla scanner with 1 mg intramuscular glucagon and without an endorectal coil.

DWI was acquired using a reduced field of view single shot EPI sequence, 160 x 80 matrix, 4.2-mm slices, TR 2000 ms, and 24 x 12-cm FOV. The acquired DWI b-values were 0, 25, 50, 800, and 1200 s/mm2 with the number of signal averages 2, 12, 12, 24, and 64, respectively. The sDWI images for a b-value of 1200 s/mm2 and corresponding ADC maps excluding the acquired b-value of 1200 s/mm2 were created using the ADC Map Calculation plugin for OsiriX. Small field-of-view (sFOV) T2 was acquired using FSE, axial orientation, 416 x 224 matrix, 3.6-mm slices, 20-cm FOV, TE 130 ms, TR 4100 ms. Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) was acquired using an axial multiphase post-contrast 3D Dual Echo SPGR.

Two blinded radiologists with 9 and 3 years of experience interpreting prostate MRI studies evaluated either the sDWI or acquired DWI with the corresponding ADC map for each patient in an alternating manner in conjunction with sFOV T2 and DCE images. sDWI or acquired DWI image quality was rated on a five-point Likert scale (1=non-diagnostic, 2=limited, 3=adequate, 4=good, 5=excellent). Readers noted either the absence or presence of peripheral zone lesions; when lesions were present, the size and location of the single largest detected lesion was recorded and assigned a PI-RADS version 2 category. A confidence score was also assigned to the overall study interpretation (1=not confident, 2=poor confidence, 3=somewhat confident, 4=confident, 5=very confident). The null hypothesis of no significant difference in scores was assessed using a Wilcoxon signed rank test and a McNemar test for binomial parameters with a target alpha of 0.05.

RESULTS

Subjective image quality was slightly but significantly lower for the sDWI images compared to acquired DWI images for a b-value of 1200 s/mm2 (3.7 ± 0.6 vs. 3.94 ± 0.5, p=0.023). No significant difference in detection of the presence of a peripheral zone lesion (p=0.085), lesion size (13.5 ± 8.4 mm vs. 13.4 ± 5.2 mm, p=0.906), or PI-RADS version 2 categories (3.9 ± 0.7 vs. 4.1 ± 0.7, p=0.268) was present between sDWI and acquired DWI images. Confidence scores for interpretation of images were also not significantly different between sDWI and acquired DWI studies (3.9 ± 0.7 vs. 4.0 ± 0.6, p=0.667).

DISCUSSION

Although subjective image quality was rated slightly but significantly worse for sDWI compared to acquired DWI images, no significant differences in detection of peripheral zone lesions, PI-RADS version 2 lesion categorization, or confidence scores for interpretation were observed. Of note, the study design was biased in favor of images acquired with 1200 s/mm2 weighting, since the images with 800 s/mm2 diffusion weighting (the main components of the synthesized b-1200 images) were acquired with fewer signal averages (24 averages) than the 1200 s/mm2 weighted images (64 signal averages); this may have resulted in the inferior subjective image quality of the synthesized images. Additionally, in this study, the echo time for the b-800 images was higher than what could have otherwise been achieved if no b-1200 images were obtained.

CONCLUSION

sDWI high b-value (1200 s/mm2) images were not significantly different for detection of peripheral zone lesions and PI-RADS version 2 categorization compared to directly acquired DWI images and may allow shorter MR acquisition time.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

1 Blackledge MD, Leach MO, Collins DJ, Koh DM. Computed diffusion-weighted MR imaging may improve tumor detection. Radiology. 2011 Nov;261(2):573-81. Epub 2011 Aug 18.

2 Maas MC, Fütterer JJ, Scheenen TW. Quantitative evaluation of computed high B value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate. Invest Radiol. 2013 Nov;48(11):779-86.

3 Ueno Y, Takahashi S, Ohno Y, Kitajima K, Yui M, Kassai Y, Kawakami F, Miyake H, Sugimura K. Computed diffusion-weighted MRI for prostate cancer detection: the influence of the combinations of b-values. Br J Radiol. 2015 Apr;88(1048):20140738. Epub 2015 Jan 21.

4 Vural M, Ertas G, Onay A, Acar Ö, Esen T, Saglican Y, Zengingönül HP, Akpek S. Conspicuity of peripheral zone prostate cancer on computed diffusion-weighted imaging: comparison of cDWI1500, cDWI2000, and cDWI3000. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:768291. Epub 2014 Dec 1.

Figures

Figure 1: Prostate MRI with acquired DWI b-1200 images rated as a 4 (good image quality) and sDWI b-1200 images rated as a 5 (excellent image quality).

Figure 2: Prostate MRI with acquired DWI b-1200 images rated as 4 (good image quality) and sDWI b-1200 images rated as 2 (limited image quality). However, both readers detected a lesion with restricted diffusion in the left mid peripheral zone (arrows) shown to be chronic prostatitis on biopsy.

Figure 3: Prostate MRI with acquired DWI b-1200 images rated as 4 and sDWI b-1200 images rated as 4 (good image quality). Both readers detected a lesion with restricted diffusion within the left base peripheral zone (arrows) shown to be prostatic adenocarcinoma (Gleason score 4+4=8) on biopsy.

Figure 4: Prostate MRI with acquired DWI b-1200 images rated as 5 (excellent image quality) and sDWI b-1200 images rated as 4 (good image quality). Both readers detected a lesion with restricted diffusion in the right mid peripheral zone (arrows). Targeted biopsy of this lesion showed benign stroma.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
3883