Kevin Charles McCammack1, Natalie M Schenker-Ahmed1, Nathan S White1, Shaun R Best2, Robert M Marks3, Jared Heimbigner3, Christopher J Kane4, J Kellogg Parsons4, Joshua M Kuperman1, Hauke Bartsch1, Rahul S Desikan1, Rebecca A Rakow-Penner1, Michael A Liss5, Daniel JA Margolis6, Steven S Raman6, Ahmed Shabaik7, Anders M Dale1, and David S Karow1
1Radiology, UCSD, San Diego, CA, United States, 2Kansas City, KS, United States, 3Radiology, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States, 4Urology, UCSD, San Diego, CA, United States, 5Urology, UT San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States, 6Radiology, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States, 7Pathology, UCSD, San Diego, CA, United States
Synopsis
Restriction Spectrum Imaging is an advanced, multiple b-value, diffusion technique which allows improved reader performance in the identification of prostate cancer when combined with current standard of care imaging, or performs comparably to current imaging practice when used alone.Target Audience
Radiologists
and scientists who interpret and study prostate MRI.
Introduction/Purpose
Restriction
Spectrum Imaging (RSI) is a multiple b-value,
multidirectional advanced diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) technique which aims
to minimize signal derived from the extracellular hindered as well as the
cylindrically restricted pools of water molecules and focus contribution from
the isotropic, intracellular, truly restricted pool (1).
This
has been used to advantage in Neuroimaging, producing greater accuracy than
conventional imaging measures in differentiating areas of glioblastoma
multiforme infiltrative tumor involvement from normal appearing cerebral white
matter (2). We have demonstrated that this provides greater quantitative discrimination of prostate cancer from normal prostate compared to conventional multiparametric MRI (MP-MRI) parameters in a prior study. In this study, we evaluated for overall clinical utility of this technique, specifically assessing reader performance of RSI in isolation and in combination with MP-MRI.
Methods
Three
readers independently evaluated 100 patients (67 with proven PCa) who underwent
MP-MRI and RSI within six months of biopsy or prostatectomy. Readers used a
five-point scale estimating the likelihood of PCa present in each prostate
sextant. Evaluation was performed in two separate sessions, first using conventional
MP-MRI alone then immediately with MP-MRI and RSI in the same session. Four
weeks later, another scoring session used RSI and T2 without conventional diffusion-weighted
or dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging. Reader interpretations were then compared
to prostatectomy data or biopsy results. Receiver operating characteristic
(ROC) curves were performed, with area under the curve (AUC) used to compare
across groups.
Results
MP-MRI with RSI achieved higher AUCs compared to
MP-MRI alone for identifying high grade PCa (0.78 versus 0.70 at the sextant
level; P <0.001 and 0.85 versus
0.79 at the hemigland level; P = 0.04).
RSI and T2 alone achieved AUCs similar to MP-MRI for high grade PCa (0.71
versus 0.70 at the sextant level). With hemigland analysis, high grade disease
results were similar when comparing RSI+T2 with MP-MRI although with greater
AUCs (0.80 versus 0.79).
Conclusion
Including
RSI with MP-MRI improves PCa detection compared to MP-MRI alone, and RSI with
T2 achieves similar PCa detection as MP-MRI.
Discussion
MP-MRI,
including DCE and conventional DWI, serves as the current standard of care
after many years of effort to improve the detection and localization of PCa via
imaging. Many studies support the added benefit of DCE and, particularly, DWI
to standard anatomic T1 and T2 sequences (3,4).
However, DCE requires intravenous contrast administration, resulting in the
burden of longer scan time, patient discomfort, and the risk of adverse
reaction. Conventional DWI is compromised by severe spatial distortion,
limiting its ability to be coregistered to anatomic images, which is necessary
for tumor localization. Additionally, conventional DWI fails to exclude signal
from the extracellular hindered and cylindrically restricted water pools,
decreasing tumor conspicuity thought to be possible with advanced DWI
techniques such as RSI (1). Additional improvements in methodology are the subject of considerable ongoing research efforts. RSI has shown promise in prior quantitative based studies, and this data supports true clinical utility as demonstrating improved performance via RSI in a reader-based format, as reflects the current practice model at most centers. This suggests RSI may serve as a valuable addition to current standard of care imaging, or possibly as a viable surrogate imaging measure in those unable to undergo comprehensive MP-MRI.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
(1) White et al, Human Brain
Mapping 34, 327-346, 2013; (2) White et al., AJNR 34(5),
958-946, 2013; (3) Delongchamps
et al., BJUI 107, 1411-1418, 2010; (4) Kitajima et al., JMRI 31,
625-631, 2010