Restriction spectrum imaging improves MRI-based prostate cancer detection
Kevin Charles McCammack1, Natalie M Schenker-Ahmed1, Nathan S White1, Shaun R Best2, Robert M Marks3, Jared Heimbigner3, Christopher J Kane4, J Kellogg Parsons4, Joshua M Kuperman1, Hauke Bartsch1, Rahul S Desikan1, Rebecca A Rakow-Penner1, Michael A Liss5, Daniel JA Margolis6, Steven S Raman6, Ahmed Shabaik7, Anders M Dale1, and David S Karow1

1Radiology, UCSD, San Diego, CA, United States, 2Kansas City, KS, United States, 3Radiology, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States, 4Urology, UCSD, San Diego, CA, United States, 5Urology, UT San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States, 6Radiology, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States, 7Pathology, UCSD, San Diego, CA, United States

Synopsis

Restriction Spectrum Imaging is an advanced, multiple b-value, diffusion technique which allows improved reader performance in the identification of prostate cancer when combined with current standard of care imaging, or performs comparably to current imaging practice when used alone.

Target Audience

Radiologists and scientists who interpret and study prostate MRI.

Introduction/Purpose

Restriction Spectrum Imaging (RSI) is a multiple b-value, multidirectional advanced diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) technique which aims to minimize signal derived from the extracellular hindered as well as the cylindrically restricted pools of water molecules and focus contribution from the isotropic, intracellular, truly restricted pool (1). This has been used to advantage in Neuroimaging, producing greater accuracy than conventional imaging measures in differentiating areas of glioblastoma multiforme infiltrative tumor involvement from normal appearing cerebral white matter (2). We have demonstrated that this provides greater quantitative discrimination of prostate cancer from normal prostate compared to conventional multiparametric MRI (MP-MRI) parameters in a prior study. In this study, we evaluated for overall clinical utility of this technique, specifically assessing reader performance of RSI in isolation and in combination with MP-MRI.

Methods

Three readers independently evaluated 100 patients (67 with proven PCa) who underwent MP-MRI and RSI within six months of biopsy or prostatectomy. Readers used a five-point scale estimating the likelihood of PCa present in each prostate sextant. Evaluation was performed in two separate sessions, first using conventional MP-MRI alone then immediately with MP-MRI and RSI in the same session. Four weeks later, another scoring session used RSI and T2 without conventional diffusion-weighted or dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging. Reader interpretations were then compared to prostatectomy data or biopsy results. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed, with area under the curve (AUC) used to compare across groups.

Results

MP-MRI with RSI achieved higher AUCs compared to MP-MRI alone for identifying high grade PCa (0.78 versus 0.70 at the sextant level; P <0.001 and 0.85 versus 0.79 at the hemigland level; P = 0.04). RSI and T2 alone achieved AUCs similar to MP-MRI for high grade PCa (0.71 versus 0.70 at the sextant level). With hemigland analysis, high grade disease results were similar when comparing RSI+T2 with MP-MRI although with greater AUCs (0.80 versus 0.79).

Conclusion

Including RSI with MP-MRI improves PCa detection compared to MP-MRI alone, and RSI with T2 achieves similar PCa detection as MP-MRI.

Discussion

MP-MRI, including DCE and conventional DWI, serves as the current standard of care after many years of effort to improve the detection and localization of PCa via imaging. Many studies support the added benefit of DCE and, particularly, DWI to standard anatomic T1 and T2 sequences (3,4). However, DCE requires intravenous contrast administration, resulting in the burden of longer scan time, patient discomfort, and the risk of adverse reaction. Conventional DWI is compromised by severe spatial distortion, limiting its ability to be coregistered to anatomic images, which is necessary for tumor localization. Additionally, conventional DWI fails to exclude signal from the extracellular hindered and cylindrically restricted water pools, decreasing tumor conspicuity thought to be possible with advanced DWI techniques such as RSI (1). Additional improvements in methodology are the subject of considerable ongoing research efforts. RSI has shown promise in prior quantitative based studies, and this data supports true clinical utility as demonstrating improved performance via RSI in a reader-based format, as reflects the current practice model at most centers. This suggests RSI may serve as a valuable addition to current standard of care imaging, or possibly as a viable surrogate imaging measure in those unable to undergo comprehensive MP-MRI.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

(1) White et al, Human Brain Mapping 34, 327-346, 2013; (2) White et al., AJNR 34(5), 958-946, 2013; (3) Delongchamps et al., BJUI 107, 1411-1418, 2010; (4) Kitajima et al., JMRI 31, 625-631, 2010

Figures

Figure 1: RSI overlaid on T2 in a 64 year old male with a prostate specific antigen level of 25.3 ng/mL demonstrates biopsy proven Gleason 4+5 involving the right base peripheral zone (white arrow) with right sided extraprostatic extension (white arrowhead) and osseous metastatic disease to the right anterior acetabular column (black arrow).

Figure 2: Axial T2, ADC map, Ktrans maps, and RSI color maps, with subsequent whole mount histopathology in (a) a 58 year old male with Gleason Score 4+3 disease in the right apex peripheral zone, (b) a 63 year old male with Gleason Score 4+3 disease in the left mid peripheral zone, and (c) a 71 year old male with Gleason Score 4+3 disease in the right mid peripheral zone. Each case demonstrates increased qualitative conspicuity of prostate cancer on RSI relative to MP-MRI.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
3862