Synopsis
An
accelerated multi-shot diffusion imaging sequence and reconstruction scheme was
developed for prostate imaging, allowing improvements in spatial resolution, geometric-fidelity
and b-factor coverage to be achieved within
a short scan time. Two-fold improvement in spatial resolution and three-fold
improvement in geometric fidelity were obtained as compared to single-shot EPI,
in twelve prostate cancer patients. In contrast to the standard protocol, which
involves separate scans with high (b=1400
and 0 s/mm2) and intermediate (b=500
and 0 s/mm2) diffusion weighting, the proposed accelerated protocol
yielded an additional 8 b-factors in
half the scan time (5 min 43 s vs. 11 min 48 s).Purpose
To
improve the speed, spatial-resolution and geometric-fidelity of diffusion-weighted
imaging in the prostate, and evaluate the possibility of perfusion
quantification with multiple
b-factors
in the same session.
Introduction
Prostate cancer (PCa)
is very common and affects approximately one man in every six. DWI is an
essential component of PCa diagnosis and staging [1, 2], however, suffers from low
resolution, geometric distortions and also low SNR unless signal averaging is
employed. Although powerful methods such as multi-coil acceleration can be
applied to reduce distortions, this is not practical in the case of prostate
imaging with a single, endo-rectal RF coil. A recent accelerated multi-shot acquisition method [3] which is fully compatible
with a single coil configuration, exploits the sparsity of diffusion-encoded
data in the
x-y-kb-kd
space, where kb and kd are Fourier-transform
duals of
b and
d, the
b-factor and the
diffusion direction, respectively. It displaces aliasing artefacts toward
underused regions of the
kb-kd
plane, and recovers non-aliased signals, at potentially no cost in scan time. The approach shifts sampling along the phase-encoding
(PE) direction between
b-factors and
directions, reducing the number of PE steps for each image but not the total
number of images. The acceleration scheme allows for relatively good resolution
with good geometrical fidelity in a short scan time and also the acquisition of
many
b-factors, which may enable perfusion quantification
and tumour characterization [4-6].
Methods
Twelve patients undergoing PCa staging
participated in this IRB-approved study (ages:
62±7 years). Imaging was
performed at 3 Tesla (MR750w system, GE Healthcare) using an endo-rectal coil
(Medrad). T
2-weighted imaging was followed by conventional and accelerated diffusion imaging protocols (Figure 1). For accelerated multi-shot DWI, the
segmentation factor equaled the acceleration factor (R=4); thus for each diffusion encoding direction and each
b-factor 32 echoes were sampled. Data were
reconstructed in the manner introduced in
[3], using the magnitude and
phase data from a concurrently acquired low-resolution 2D navigator echo
(matrix=32x32, TE=128.4ms) for
regularization
and motion correction, respectively.
In order to obtain the highest quality diffusion-weighted images at the
diagnostically relevant
b-factors 500
and 1400 s/mm
2 together with a range of
b-factors suitable for multi-exponential analysis, a protocol with
variable density b-factor sampling
was designed. Moreover, to ensure correct diffusion encoding at very low
b-factors, a crusher gradient-free
design was employed with a minimum
b-factor
of 12.5 s/mm
2 for adequate
alternate signal crushing. Lesions and normal tissue in the peripheral zone and
central gland were delineated on conventional (
b=500 and 1400 s/mm
2) and accelerated direction-averaged
DWI. ADC maps were calculated from non-linear least-square fits with
monoexponential functions: $$$S/S_0 = exp(-bD)$$$ using multiple
b-factors up to
b=500 or
b=1400 s/mm
2
weighted according to the number of averages. Perfusion-free diffusion
coefficients (D) and perfusion
fractions (f) were calculated in each
ROI from non-linear weighted least-square fits with biexponential functions: $$$S/S_0 = (1-f) exp(-bD) + f
exp(-bD^*)$$$ [7], using multiple
b-factors up to
b=500
s/mm
2 with D* as a free
parameter or fixed at 10 mm
2/ms.
Results
Nine patients had lesions; five had a Prostate
Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score of 5, four PI-RADS 4, one
PI-RADS 2, and two a PIRADS score of 1. Accelerated DWI produced diagnostic
quality high-resolution images (Figs. 2 and 3), except for one case with severe
motion. Geometric-fidelity improved by a factor of 2.80 ± 1.99 over
conventional DWI (Figure 4). Sample bi-exponential fits are shown in Figure 5: a higher perfusion fraction
was found in lesions relative to normal tissue.
Discussion
Scan time for the present accelerated
acquisition, with 11
b-factors acquired
at two-fold resolution and three-times the geometric-fidelity of a single-shot
EPI sequence, was below 6 min. In contrast, acquiring 2 single
b-factors and
b0 took nearly 12 min with single-shot EPI. Geometric-fidelity
improved nearly as much as the theoretically-expected 3.33-fold. Perfusion parameters were in good agreement with the limited available
literature (f: 3.7-23%, D*: 7-21 μm
2/ms, D: 1.2-1.9 μm
2/ms in [4, 8-10]) and subsequent DCE
acquisitions. These improvements were achieved with a single-channel coil and
further improvements in accelerated DWI quality may be possible with the
addition of multi-channel coils. Future work includes investigating the effect
of regularization strength on calculated ADC values [3] and its effect on
residual ghosting such as sometimes seen from the rectal wall.
Conclusion
Accelerated
DWI in the prostate with higher spatial-resolution, geometric-fidelity, and multiple
b-factors for potential perfusion
quantification within the same session, was feasible while maintaining good SNR
and reasonable scan times.
Acknowledgements
NIH R01CA160902,
R01EB010195, 5R25CA089017-10, P41EB015898 and R01CA149342.References
1. Tempany,
C.M., et al., Multimodal imaging for
improved diagnosis and treatment of cancers. Cancer, 2014. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29012.
2. Hegde, J.V., et al., Multiparametric MRI of prostate cancer: an
update on state-of-the-art techniques and their performance in detecting and
localizing prostate cancer. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2013. 37(5): p. 1035-54.
3. Madore, B., et al., Accelerated multi-shot diffusion imaging.
Magn Reson Med, 2014. 72(2): p.
324-36.
4. Dopfert, J., et al., Investigation of prostate cancer using
diffusion-weighted intravoxel incoherent motion imaging. Magn Reson
Imaging, 2011. 29(8): p. 1053-8.
5. Shinmoto, H., et al., Biexponential apparent diffusion
coefficients in prostate cancer. Magn Reson Imaging, 2009. 27(3): p. 355-9.
6. Zhang, Y.D., et al., The histogram analysis of diffusion-weighted
intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging for differentiating the gleason
grade of prostate cancer. Eur Radiol, 2015. 25(4): p. 994-1004.
7. Le Bihan, D., et al., Separation of diffusion and perfusion in
intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology, 1988. 168(2): p. 497-505.
8. Pang, Y., et al., Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for prostate cancer: an
evaluation of perfusion fraction and diffusion coefficient derived from
different b-value combinations. Magn Reson Med, 2013. 69(2): p. 553-62.
9. Mazaheri, Y., et al., Reducing the influence of b-value selection
on diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate: evaluation of a revised
monoexponential model within a clinical setting. J Magn Reson Imaging,
2012. 35(3): p. 660-8.
10. Riches, S.F., et al., Diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate
and rectal wall: comparison of biexponential and monoexponential modelled
diffusion and associated perfusion coefficients. NMR Biomed, 2009. 22(3): p. 318-25.