Jin Yamamura1, Sarah Keller1, Regine Grosse2, Bjoern Schoennagel1, Peter Nielsen3, Zhiyue Jerry Wang4, Joachim Graessner5, Hendrick Kooijman6, Gerhard Adam1, and Roland Fischer3,7
1Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany, 2Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany, 3Biochemistry, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany, 4Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States, 5Siemens Healthcare AG, Hamburg, Germany, 6Philips Medical Care, Hamburg, Germany, 7Radiology, Children’s Hospital & Research Center Oakland, Oakland, CA, United States
Synopsis
We are investigating the suitability of a 3.0 T
imager for iron measurements over the whole range of possible iron
concentrations in the liver and spleen iron.
For liver iron measurements in severely
overloaded patients with LIC > 2400 µg/gliver or > 15 mg/gdry
weight, 1.5 Tesla imagers are better suited than 3.0 Tesla systems. Purpose
The assessment
of iron overload in transfusion dependent patients was studied by the new
generation of 3 T imagers. From physical principles, a ratio of 2:1 could be
expected between the transverse relaxation rates (R2*) at 3.0 and 1.5 Tesla.
This was confirmed for liver and heart in former publications (1,2). We are
investigating the suitability of a 3.0 T imager for iron measurements over the
whole range of possible iron concentrations in the liver and other organs or
glands. Here, we report our results on liver and spleen iron.
Material and Methods
Patients
with transfusional siderosis (ß-thalassemia major n=8, age: 20-66 y) and one
normal subject underwent a gradient recalled multi-echo (GRE) sequence (R2*). For
assessment of transverse relaxation rates R2*, 2D single slice (n = 5-7, 8 mm data
acquisition was performed at 1.5 T (Avanto®, Siemens AG, Erlangen, Germany)
using a breath-hold GRE sequence (TR = 500 ms, 12 bipolar echoes with TE =
1.3-25.7 ms, Dt = 1.16 ms, flip
angle = 20°, bandwidth 1955 Hz/pixel). At 3.0 T (Ingenia®, Philips AG,
Eindhoven, Netherlands), a breath-hold 3D multi-slice (n = 20, 8 mm,
oversampling 1.5) data acquisition was used (TR = 24.3 ms, TE = 1.2-23.05 ms, Dt = 20 · 1.15 ms, flip angle = 3°,
bandwidth 1425 Hz/pixel). In patients with suspected severe liver iron burden
(LIC > 2000 µg/gliver), an additional 3D sequence with shorter
echo times was used (TE = 0.65-16.93 ms, Dt = 20 · 0.86 ms). In vivo liver iron concentration (LIC,
dry-weight conversion factor = 6) was determined from hemosiderin/ferritin
magnetic susceptibilities as noninvasively measured by SQUID biomagnetic liver
susceptometry (BLS). R2* was determined from a mono-exponential fit to the
echo-time dependent signal amplitudes (magnitude) averaged over a whole liver
slice (large blood and bile vessels excluded) with constant signal level
offset.
Results
In patients, liver iron ranged from LIC = 700
to 4200 µg/gliver. In the normal control, we found 176 µg/gliver
(normal range: 100-400 µg/g). At 1.5 and 3.0 T, mean liver R2* rates averaged
over a whole liver slice were 458 ± 307 s-1 and 719 ± 407 s-1,
respectively. A non-linear relationship was found between R2*(3T) and R2*(1.5T)
with R2*(3T) = (1514±237)·(1 – exp[-(1.7±0.5)·10-3 · R2*(1.5T)]) (r²
= 0.95) due to the higher relaxivity at 3 Tesla, see Fig. 1. Below R2* <
1200 s-1 at 3 T equivalent to a LIC < 2400 µg/gliver
(< 15 mg/gd.w.), the relationship could be linearized to R2*(3T)
= (1.85±0.04)·R2*(1.5T) (r² = 0.99) with negligible intercept. These findings agree with similar findings
from other reports (1,2). Spleen R2* was obtained between 30 and 1006 s-1
at 3.0 T with a linear regression coefficient of 2.17 related to 1.5 T (r² =
0.97). In order to overcome the saturation effect of the 3T relaxivity for
severe liver iron overload one has to put constraints on the signal amplitude
(spin density). This can be done by a shorter 1st echo time, an
estimate of the signal amplitude from nearby surrogate tissue (subcutaneous
thorax fat), or using the signal intensity ratio method (1).
Conclusion
For
liver iron measurements in severely overloaded patients with LIC > 2400 µg/gliver
or > 15 mg/gdry weight, 1.5 Tesla imagers are better suited than
3.0 Tesla systems. For R2* rates below that level, 3.0 T systems with 3D data
acquisition are more advantageous, especially for other organs and glands
(pancreas, kidney, adrenals) due to a better image quality.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Storey P, Thompson AA, Carquevile
CL, et al. R2* imaging of transfusional iron burden at 3T and
comparison with 1.5T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25:540-547.
2. Meloni A, Positano V, Keilberg P. Et al. Feasibility,
reproducibility and reliability for the T2* iron evaluation at 3 T in
comparison with 1.5 T. Magn Reson Med 2012;68:543-551.